Cargando…

High sedation needs of critically ill COVID-19 ARDS patients—A monocentric observational study

BACKGROUND: Therapy of severely affected coronavirus patient, requiring intubation and sedation is still challenging. Recently, difficulties in sedating these patients have been discussed. This study aims to describe sedation practices in patients with 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-induced acu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flinspach, Armin Niklas, Booke, Hendrik, Zacharowski, Kai, Balaban, Ümniye, Herrmann, Eva, Adam, Elisabeth Hannah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34314422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253778
_version_ 1783729734595641344
author Flinspach, Armin Niklas
Booke, Hendrik
Zacharowski, Kai
Balaban, Ümniye
Herrmann, Eva
Adam, Elisabeth Hannah
author_facet Flinspach, Armin Niklas
Booke, Hendrik
Zacharowski, Kai
Balaban, Ümniye
Herrmann, Eva
Adam, Elisabeth Hannah
author_sort Flinspach, Armin Niklas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Therapy of severely affected coronavirus patient, requiring intubation and sedation is still challenging. Recently, difficulties in sedating these patients have been discussed. This study aims to describe sedation practices in patients with 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: We performed a retrospective monocentric analysis of sedation regimens in critically ill intubated patients with respiratory failure who required sedation in our mixed 32-bed university intensive care unit. All mechanically ventilated adults with COVID-19-induced ARDS requiring continuously infused sedative therapy admitted between April 4, 2020, and June 30, 2020 were included. We recorded demographic data, sedative dosages, prone positioning, sedation levels and duration. Descriptive data analysis was performed; for additional analysis, a logistic regression with mixed effect was used. RESULTS: In total, 56 patients (mean age 67 (±14) years) were included. The mean observed sedation period was 224 (±139) hours. To achieve the prescribed sedation level, we observed the need for two or three sedatives in 48.7% and 12.8% of the cases, respectively. In cases with a triple sedation regimen, the combination of clonidine, esketamine and midazolam was observed in most cases (75.7%). Analgesia was achieved using sufentanil in 98.6% of the cases. The analysis showed that the majority of COVID-19 patients required an unusually high sedation dose compared to those available in the literature. CONCLUSION: The global pandemic continues to affect patients severely requiring ventilation and sedation, but optimal sedation strategies are still lacking. The findings of our observation suggest unusual high dosages of sedatives in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19. Prescribed sedation levels appear to be achievable only with several combinations of sedatives in most critically ill patients suffering from COVID-19-induced ARDS and a potential association to the often required sophisticated critical care including prone positioning and ECMO treatment seems conceivable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8315516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83155162021-07-31 High sedation needs of critically ill COVID-19 ARDS patients—A monocentric observational study Flinspach, Armin Niklas Booke, Hendrik Zacharowski, Kai Balaban, Ümniye Herrmann, Eva Adam, Elisabeth Hannah PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Therapy of severely affected coronavirus patient, requiring intubation and sedation is still challenging. Recently, difficulties in sedating these patients have been discussed. This study aims to describe sedation practices in patients with 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19)-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: We performed a retrospective monocentric analysis of sedation regimens in critically ill intubated patients with respiratory failure who required sedation in our mixed 32-bed university intensive care unit. All mechanically ventilated adults with COVID-19-induced ARDS requiring continuously infused sedative therapy admitted between April 4, 2020, and June 30, 2020 were included. We recorded demographic data, sedative dosages, prone positioning, sedation levels and duration. Descriptive data analysis was performed; for additional analysis, a logistic regression with mixed effect was used. RESULTS: In total, 56 patients (mean age 67 (±14) years) were included. The mean observed sedation period was 224 (±139) hours. To achieve the prescribed sedation level, we observed the need for two or three sedatives in 48.7% and 12.8% of the cases, respectively. In cases with a triple sedation regimen, the combination of clonidine, esketamine and midazolam was observed in most cases (75.7%). Analgesia was achieved using sufentanil in 98.6% of the cases. The analysis showed that the majority of COVID-19 patients required an unusually high sedation dose compared to those available in the literature. CONCLUSION: The global pandemic continues to affect patients severely requiring ventilation and sedation, but optimal sedation strategies are still lacking. The findings of our observation suggest unusual high dosages of sedatives in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19. Prescribed sedation levels appear to be achievable only with several combinations of sedatives in most critically ill patients suffering from COVID-19-induced ARDS and a potential association to the often required sophisticated critical care including prone positioning and ECMO treatment seems conceivable. Public Library of Science 2021-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8315516/ /pubmed/34314422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253778 Text en © 2021 Flinspach et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Flinspach, Armin Niklas
Booke, Hendrik
Zacharowski, Kai
Balaban, Ümniye
Herrmann, Eva
Adam, Elisabeth Hannah
High sedation needs of critically ill COVID-19 ARDS patients—A monocentric observational study
title High sedation needs of critically ill COVID-19 ARDS patients—A monocentric observational study
title_full High sedation needs of critically ill COVID-19 ARDS patients—A monocentric observational study
title_fullStr High sedation needs of critically ill COVID-19 ARDS patients—A monocentric observational study
title_full_unstemmed High sedation needs of critically ill COVID-19 ARDS patients—A monocentric observational study
title_short High sedation needs of critically ill COVID-19 ARDS patients—A monocentric observational study
title_sort high sedation needs of critically ill covid-19 ards patients—a monocentric observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34314422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253778
work_keys_str_mv AT flinspacharminniklas highsedationneedsofcriticallyillcovid19ardspatientsamonocentricobservationalstudy
AT bookehendrik highsedationneedsofcriticallyillcovid19ardspatientsamonocentricobservationalstudy
AT zacharowskikai highsedationneedsofcriticallyillcovid19ardspatientsamonocentricobservationalstudy
AT balabanumniye highsedationneedsofcriticallyillcovid19ardspatientsamonocentricobservationalstudy
AT herrmanneva highsedationneedsofcriticallyillcovid19ardspatientsamonocentricobservationalstudy
AT adamelisabethhannah highsedationneedsofcriticallyillcovid19ardspatientsamonocentricobservationalstudy