Cargando…

Are we walking the talk of participatory Indigenous health research? A scoping review of the literature in Atlantic Canada

INTRODUCTION: Participatory research involving community engagement is considered the gold standard in Indigenous health research. However, it is sometimes unclear whether and how Indigenous communities are engaged in research that impacts them, and whether and how engagement is reported. Indigenous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, Kathleen, Branje, Karina, White, Tara, Cunsolo, Ashlee, Latimer, Margot, McMillan, Jane, Sylliboy, John R., McKibbon, Shelley, Martin, Debbie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34314455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255265
_version_ 1783729739917164544
author Murphy, Kathleen
Branje, Karina
White, Tara
Cunsolo, Ashlee
Latimer, Margot
McMillan, Jane
Sylliboy, John R.
McKibbon, Shelley
Martin, Debbie
author_facet Murphy, Kathleen
Branje, Karina
White, Tara
Cunsolo, Ashlee
Latimer, Margot
McMillan, Jane
Sylliboy, John R.
McKibbon, Shelley
Martin, Debbie
author_sort Murphy, Kathleen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Participatory research involving community engagement is considered the gold standard in Indigenous health research. However, it is sometimes unclear whether and how Indigenous communities are engaged in research that impacts them, and whether and how engagement is reported. Indigenous health research varies in its degree of community engagement from minimal involvement to being community-directed and led. Research led and directed by Indigenous communities can support reconciliation and reclamation in Canada and globally, however clearer reporting and understandings of community-led research is needed. This scoping review assesses (a) how and to what extent researchers are reporting community engagement in Indigenous health research in Atlantic Canada, and (b) what recommendations exist in the literature regarding participatory and community-led research. METHODS: Eleven databases were searched using keywords for Indigeneity, geographic regions, health, and Indigenous communities in Atlantic Canada between 2001-June 2020. Records were independently screened by two reviewers and were included if they were: peer-reviewed; written in English; health-related; and focused on Atlantic Canada. Data were extracted using a piloted data charting form, and a descriptive and thematic analysis was performed. 211 articles were retained for inclusion. RESULTS: Few empirical articles reported community engagement in all aspects of the research process. Most described incorporating community engagement at the project’s onset and/or during data collection; only a few articles explicitly identified as entirely community-directed or led. Results revealed a gap in reported capacity-building for both Indigenous communities and researchers, necessary for holistic community engagement. Also revealed was the need for funding bodies, ethics boards, and peer review processes to better facilitate participatory and community-led Indigenous health research. CONCLUSION: As Indigenous communities continue reclaiming sovereignty over identities and territories, participatory research must involve substantive, agreed-upon involvement of Indigenous communities, with community-directed and led research as the ultimate goal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8315539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83155392021-07-31 Are we walking the talk of participatory Indigenous health research? A scoping review of the literature in Atlantic Canada Murphy, Kathleen Branje, Karina White, Tara Cunsolo, Ashlee Latimer, Margot McMillan, Jane Sylliboy, John R. McKibbon, Shelley Martin, Debbie PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Participatory research involving community engagement is considered the gold standard in Indigenous health research. However, it is sometimes unclear whether and how Indigenous communities are engaged in research that impacts them, and whether and how engagement is reported. Indigenous health research varies in its degree of community engagement from minimal involvement to being community-directed and led. Research led and directed by Indigenous communities can support reconciliation and reclamation in Canada and globally, however clearer reporting and understandings of community-led research is needed. This scoping review assesses (a) how and to what extent researchers are reporting community engagement in Indigenous health research in Atlantic Canada, and (b) what recommendations exist in the literature regarding participatory and community-led research. METHODS: Eleven databases were searched using keywords for Indigeneity, geographic regions, health, and Indigenous communities in Atlantic Canada between 2001-June 2020. Records were independently screened by two reviewers and were included if they were: peer-reviewed; written in English; health-related; and focused on Atlantic Canada. Data were extracted using a piloted data charting form, and a descriptive and thematic analysis was performed. 211 articles were retained for inclusion. RESULTS: Few empirical articles reported community engagement in all aspects of the research process. Most described incorporating community engagement at the project’s onset and/or during data collection; only a few articles explicitly identified as entirely community-directed or led. Results revealed a gap in reported capacity-building for both Indigenous communities and researchers, necessary for holistic community engagement. Also revealed was the need for funding bodies, ethics boards, and peer review processes to better facilitate participatory and community-led Indigenous health research. CONCLUSION: As Indigenous communities continue reclaiming sovereignty over identities and territories, participatory research must involve substantive, agreed-upon involvement of Indigenous communities, with community-directed and led research as the ultimate goal. Public Library of Science 2021-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8315539/ /pubmed/34314455 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255265 Text en © 2021 Murphy et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Murphy, Kathleen
Branje, Karina
White, Tara
Cunsolo, Ashlee
Latimer, Margot
McMillan, Jane
Sylliboy, John R.
McKibbon, Shelley
Martin, Debbie
Are we walking the talk of participatory Indigenous health research? A scoping review of the literature in Atlantic Canada
title Are we walking the talk of participatory Indigenous health research? A scoping review of the literature in Atlantic Canada
title_full Are we walking the talk of participatory Indigenous health research? A scoping review of the literature in Atlantic Canada
title_fullStr Are we walking the talk of participatory Indigenous health research? A scoping review of the literature in Atlantic Canada
title_full_unstemmed Are we walking the talk of participatory Indigenous health research? A scoping review of the literature in Atlantic Canada
title_short Are we walking the talk of participatory Indigenous health research? A scoping review of the literature in Atlantic Canada
title_sort are we walking the talk of participatory indigenous health research? a scoping review of the literature in atlantic canada
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34314455
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255265
work_keys_str_mv AT murphykathleen arewewalkingthetalkofparticipatoryindigenoushealthresearchascopingreviewoftheliteratureinatlanticcanada
AT branjekarina arewewalkingthetalkofparticipatoryindigenoushealthresearchascopingreviewoftheliteratureinatlanticcanada
AT whitetara arewewalkingthetalkofparticipatoryindigenoushealthresearchascopingreviewoftheliteratureinatlanticcanada
AT cunsoloashlee arewewalkingthetalkofparticipatoryindigenoushealthresearchascopingreviewoftheliteratureinatlanticcanada
AT latimermargot arewewalkingthetalkofparticipatoryindigenoushealthresearchascopingreviewoftheliteratureinatlanticcanada
AT mcmillanjane arewewalkingthetalkofparticipatoryindigenoushealthresearchascopingreviewoftheliteratureinatlanticcanada
AT sylliboyjohnr arewewalkingthetalkofparticipatoryindigenoushealthresearchascopingreviewoftheliteratureinatlanticcanada
AT mckibbonshelley arewewalkingthetalkofparticipatoryindigenoushealthresearchascopingreviewoftheliteratureinatlanticcanada
AT martindebbie arewewalkingthetalkofparticipatoryindigenoushealthresearchascopingreviewoftheliteratureinatlanticcanada