Cargando…

Impact of COVID-19 on air quality in the Yangtze River Delta, China

To investigate the effect of nationwide restrictions due to COVID-19 on air quality in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), China, we defined four periods named period I (January 1 to 23, 2020), period II (January 24 to February 23), period III (February 24 to April 7), and period IV (April 8 to May 31),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yao, Lan, Li, Weiyue, Du, Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34318366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09342-1
Descripción
Sumario:To investigate the effect of nationwide restrictions due to COVID-19 on air quality in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), China, we defined four periods named period I (January 1 to 23, 2020), period II (January 24 to February 23), period III (February 24 to April 7), and period IV (April 8 to May 31), which indicated normal period, lockdown period, regional work resumption period, and nationwide work resumption period, respectively. Hourly PM(2.5), PM(10), NO(2), SO(2), CO, and O(3) in 41 cities in the YRD region were analyzed. Compared to period I, NO(2) decreased by 58% during period II and increased in periods III and IV. SO(2) remained constant during the four periods (7–8 μg/m(3)). Higher PM(2.5) concentration was monitored during period II (41 μg/m(3)) when compared to period III (35 μg/m(3)), which was resulted from the enhanced secondary formation. Spatial distribution analysis further indicated that PM(2.5) in the northern YRD during period II was higher than that during period III, whereas PM(2.5) in the southern YRD in the period II was similar to that in period III. The results demonstrated that PM(2.5) shows a nonlinear response to the reduction of its precursors, and this phenomenon varies in different areas. Compared to periods I (36 μg/m(3)) and III (64 μg/m(3)), relatively higher O(3) during period II (64 μg/m(3)) was probably resulted from less NO emission and hence weakened NO titration effect. The study suggested that coordinated and balanced measures are needed to improve air quality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10661-021-09342-1.