Cargando…

Impact of COVID-19 on air quality in the Yangtze River Delta, China

To investigate the effect of nationwide restrictions due to COVID-19 on air quality in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), China, we defined four periods named period I (January 1 to 23, 2020), period II (January 24 to February 23), period III (February 24 to April 7), and period IV (April 8 to May 31),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yao, Lan, Li, Weiyue, Du, Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34318366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09342-1
_version_ 1783729760543703040
author Yao, Lan
Li, Weiyue
Du, Yi
author_facet Yao, Lan
Li, Weiyue
Du, Yi
author_sort Yao, Lan
collection PubMed
description To investigate the effect of nationwide restrictions due to COVID-19 on air quality in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), China, we defined four periods named period I (January 1 to 23, 2020), period II (January 24 to February 23), period III (February 24 to April 7), and period IV (April 8 to May 31), which indicated normal period, lockdown period, regional work resumption period, and nationwide work resumption period, respectively. Hourly PM(2.5), PM(10), NO(2), SO(2), CO, and O(3) in 41 cities in the YRD region were analyzed. Compared to period I, NO(2) decreased by 58% during period II and increased in periods III and IV. SO(2) remained constant during the four periods (7–8 μg/m(3)). Higher PM(2.5) concentration was monitored during period II (41 μg/m(3)) when compared to period III (35 μg/m(3)), which was resulted from the enhanced secondary formation. Spatial distribution analysis further indicated that PM(2.5) in the northern YRD during period II was higher than that during period III, whereas PM(2.5) in the southern YRD in the period II was similar to that in period III. The results demonstrated that PM(2.5) shows a nonlinear response to the reduction of its precursors, and this phenomenon varies in different areas. Compared to periods I (36 μg/m(3)) and III (64 μg/m(3)), relatively higher O(3) during period II (64 μg/m(3)) was probably resulted from less NO emission and hence weakened NO titration effect. The study suggested that coordinated and balanced measures are needed to improve air quality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10661-021-09342-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8315727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83157272021-07-28 Impact of COVID-19 on air quality in the Yangtze River Delta, China Yao, Lan Li, Weiyue Du, Yi Environ Monit Assess Article To investigate the effect of nationwide restrictions due to COVID-19 on air quality in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD), China, we defined four periods named period I (January 1 to 23, 2020), period II (January 24 to February 23), period III (February 24 to April 7), and period IV (April 8 to May 31), which indicated normal period, lockdown period, regional work resumption period, and nationwide work resumption period, respectively. Hourly PM(2.5), PM(10), NO(2), SO(2), CO, and O(3) in 41 cities in the YRD region were analyzed. Compared to period I, NO(2) decreased by 58% during period II and increased in periods III and IV. SO(2) remained constant during the four periods (7–8 μg/m(3)). Higher PM(2.5) concentration was monitored during period II (41 μg/m(3)) when compared to period III (35 μg/m(3)), which was resulted from the enhanced secondary formation. Spatial distribution analysis further indicated that PM(2.5) in the northern YRD during period II was higher than that during period III, whereas PM(2.5) in the southern YRD in the period II was similar to that in period III. The results demonstrated that PM(2.5) shows a nonlinear response to the reduction of its precursors, and this phenomenon varies in different areas. Compared to periods I (36 μg/m(3)) and III (64 μg/m(3)), relatively higher O(3) during period II (64 μg/m(3)) was probably resulted from less NO emission and hence weakened NO titration effect. The study suggested that coordinated and balanced measures are needed to improve air quality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10661-021-09342-1. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-27 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8315727/ /pubmed/34318366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09342-1 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Yao, Lan
Li, Weiyue
Du, Yi
Impact of COVID-19 on air quality in the Yangtze River Delta, China
title Impact of COVID-19 on air quality in the Yangtze River Delta, China
title_full Impact of COVID-19 on air quality in the Yangtze River Delta, China
title_fullStr Impact of COVID-19 on air quality in the Yangtze River Delta, China
title_full_unstemmed Impact of COVID-19 on air quality in the Yangtze River Delta, China
title_short Impact of COVID-19 on air quality in the Yangtze River Delta, China
title_sort impact of covid-19 on air quality in the yangtze river delta, china
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34318366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-021-09342-1
work_keys_str_mv AT yaolan impactofcovid19onairqualityintheyangtzeriverdeltachina
AT liweiyue impactofcovid19onairqualityintheyangtzeriverdeltachina
AT duyi impactofcovid19onairqualityintheyangtzeriverdeltachina