Cargando…

Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy in Patients Who Have Had Multiple Miscarriages: A Review of Current Literature

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is an obstetrical complication that affects about 3% of reproductive age couples. Genetic and non-genetic causes of RPL are multiple; however, aneuploidy is the most common obstetrical complication that can explain single and recurrent pregnancy loss (present in about...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papas, Ralph S, Kutteh, William H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34326658
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TACG.S320778
_version_ 1783729778510004224
author Papas, Ralph S
Kutteh, William H
author_facet Papas, Ralph S
Kutteh, William H
author_sort Papas, Ralph S
collection PubMed
description Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is an obstetrical complication that affects about 3% of reproductive age couples. Genetic and non-genetic causes of RPL are multiple; however, aneuploidy is the most common obstetrical complication that can explain single and recurrent pregnancy loss (present in about 60% of recognized clinical pregnancies which result in a miscarriage). Parental karyotyping will only be of potential benefit for 2 to 5 percentage of RPL couples who are translocation carriers. Products of conception (POC) karyotype analysis has been used to direct management in RPL and has been shown to be cost-effective, but the technique has many limitations including high culture failure rate and maternal cell contamination. These limitations can be significantly reduced using POC chromosomal microarray (CMA) technology. We believe that POC genetic testing should be performed after the second and subsequent pregnancy loss using CMA. Although the results will not generally alter the course of treatment, the knowledge of the reason for the loss is of great emotional comfort to many patients. In addition, POC CMA performed in conjunction with a regular complete maternal RPL work-up will identify the group of truly unexplained RPL. Thus, only 10% of patients with RPL will complete an evaluation having a euploid loss and an otherwise normal work-up. This group of “truly unexplained RPL” would be ideal for new research trials and therapies. Pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT) technology has improved recently with day 5 trophectoderm biopsy as compared to biopsy on day 3 as well as with the addition of CMA and next-generation sequencing technologies. The most recent studies on PGT-SR (PGT-Structural rearrangement) show improved clinical and live birth rates per pregnancy, as well as decreased miscarriage rate for translocation carriers. PGT-A (PGT-aneuploidy) may have a limited role in RPL in cases with documented recurrent POC aneuploidy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8315809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83158092021-07-28 Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy in Patients Who Have Had Multiple Miscarriages: A Review of Current Literature Papas, Ralph S Kutteh, William H Appl Clin Genet Review Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is an obstetrical complication that affects about 3% of reproductive age couples. Genetic and non-genetic causes of RPL are multiple; however, aneuploidy is the most common obstetrical complication that can explain single and recurrent pregnancy loss (present in about 60% of recognized clinical pregnancies which result in a miscarriage). Parental karyotyping will only be of potential benefit for 2 to 5 percentage of RPL couples who are translocation carriers. Products of conception (POC) karyotype analysis has been used to direct management in RPL and has been shown to be cost-effective, but the technique has many limitations including high culture failure rate and maternal cell contamination. These limitations can be significantly reduced using POC chromosomal microarray (CMA) technology. We believe that POC genetic testing should be performed after the second and subsequent pregnancy loss using CMA. Although the results will not generally alter the course of treatment, the knowledge of the reason for the loss is of great emotional comfort to many patients. In addition, POC CMA performed in conjunction with a regular complete maternal RPL work-up will identify the group of truly unexplained RPL. Thus, only 10% of patients with RPL will complete an evaluation having a euploid loss and an otherwise normal work-up. This group of “truly unexplained RPL” would be ideal for new research trials and therapies. Pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT) technology has improved recently with day 5 trophectoderm biopsy as compared to biopsy on day 3 as well as with the addition of CMA and next-generation sequencing technologies. The most recent studies on PGT-SR (PGT-Structural rearrangement) show improved clinical and live birth rates per pregnancy, as well as decreased miscarriage rate for translocation carriers. PGT-A (PGT-aneuploidy) may have a limited role in RPL in cases with documented recurrent POC aneuploidy. Dove 2021-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8315809/ /pubmed/34326658 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TACG.S320778 Text en © 2021 Papas and Kutteh. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Papas, Ralph S
Kutteh, William H
Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy in Patients Who Have Had Multiple Miscarriages: A Review of Current Literature
title Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy in Patients Who Have Had Multiple Miscarriages: A Review of Current Literature
title_full Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy in Patients Who Have Had Multiple Miscarriages: A Review of Current Literature
title_fullStr Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy in Patients Who Have Had Multiple Miscarriages: A Review of Current Literature
title_full_unstemmed Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy in Patients Who Have Had Multiple Miscarriages: A Review of Current Literature
title_short Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy in Patients Who Have Had Multiple Miscarriages: A Review of Current Literature
title_sort genetic testing for aneuploidy in patients who have had multiple miscarriages: a review of current literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34326658
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TACG.S320778
work_keys_str_mv AT papasralphs genetictestingforaneuploidyinpatientswhohavehadmultiplemiscarriagesareviewofcurrentliterature
AT kuttehwilliamh genetictestingforaneuploidyinpatientswhohavehadmultiplemiscarriagesareviewofcurrentliterature