Cargando…

A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of Adsorbents

A systematic literature review of publications from 2000 to 2020 was carried out to identify research trends on adsorbent materials for the removal of caffeine from aqueous solutions. Publications were retrieved from three databases (Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar). Words “adsorption AND...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Quintero-Jaramillo, Javier Andrés, Carrero-Mantilla, Javier Ignacio, Sanabria-González, Nancy Rocío
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9998924
_version_ 1783729792888078336
author Quintero-Jaramillo, Javier Andrés
Carrero-Mantilla, Javier Ignacio
Sanabria-González, Nancy Rocío
author_facet Quintero-Jaramillo, Javier Andrés
Carrero-Mantilla, Javier Ignacio
Sanabria-González, Nancy Rocío
author_sort Quintero-Jaramillo, Javier Andrés
collection PubMed
description A systematic literature review of publications from 2000 to 2020 was carried out to identify research trends on adsorbent materials for the removal of caffeine from aqueous solutions. Publications were retrieved from three databases (Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar). Words “adsorption AND caffeine” were examined into titles, abstracts, and keywords. A brief bibliometric analysis was performed with emphasis on the type of publication and of most cited articles. Materials for the removal of caffeine were classified according to the type of material into three main groups: organic, inorganic, and composites, each of them subdivided into different subgroups consistent with their origin or production. Tables resume for each subgroup of adsorbents the key information: specific surface area, dose, pH, maximum adsorption capacity, and isotherm models for the removal of caffeine. The highest adsorption capacities were achieved by organic adsorbents, specifically those with granular activated carbon (1961.3 mg/g) and grape stalk activated carbon (916.7 mg/g). Phenyl-phosphate-based porous organic polymer (301 mg/g), natural sandy loam sediment (221.2 mg/g), composites of MCM-48 encapsulated graphene oxide (153.8 mg/g), and organically modified clay (143.7 mg/g) showed adsorption capacities lower than those of activated carbons. In some activated carbons, a relation between the specific surface area (SSA) and the maximum adsorption capacity (Q(max)) was found.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8315881
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83158812021-07-31 A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of Adsorbents Quintero-Jaramillo, Javier Andrés Carrero-Mantilla, Javier Ignacio Sanabria-González, Nancy Rocío ScientificWorldJournal Review Article A systematic literature review of publications from 2000 to 2020 was carried out to identify research trends on adsorbent materials for the removal of caffeine from aqueous solutions. Publications were retrieved from three databases (Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar). Words “adsorption AND caffeine” were examined into titles, abstracts, and keywords. A brief bibliometric analysis was performed with emphasis on the type of publication and of most cited articles. Materials for the removal of caffeine were classified according to the type of material into three main groups: organic, inorganic, and composites, each of them subdivided into different subgroups consistent with their origin or production. Tables resume for each subgroup of adsorbents the key information: specific surface area, dose, pH, maximum adsorption capacity, and isotherm models for the removal of caffeine. The highest adsorption capacities were achieved by organic adsorbents, specifically those with granular activated carbon (1961.3 mg/g) and grape stalk activated carbon (916.7 mg/g). Phenyl-phosphate-based porous organic polymer (301 mg/g), natural sandy loam sediment (221.2 mg/g), composites of MCM-48 encapsulated graphene oxide (153.8 mg/g), and organically modified clay (143.7 mg/g) showed adsorption capacities lower than those of activated carbons. In some activated carbons, a relation between the specific surface area (SSA) and the maximum adsorption capacity (Q(max)) was found. Hindawi 2021-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8315881/ /pubmed/34335116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9998924 Text en Copyright © 2021 Javier Andrés Quintero-Jaramillo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Quintero-Jaramillo, Javier Andrés
Carrero-Mantilla, Javier Ignacio
Sanabria-González, Nancy Rocío
A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of Adsorbents
title A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of Adsorbents
title_full A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of Adsorbents
title_fullStr A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of Adsorbents
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of Adsorbents
title_short A Review of Caffeine Adsorption Studies onto Various Types of Adsorbents
title_sort review of caffeine adsorption studies onto various types of adsorbents
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315881/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9998924
work_keys_str_mv AT quinterojaramillojavierandres areviewofcaffeineadsorptionstudiesontovarioustypesofadsorbents
AT carreromantillajavierignacio areviewofcaffeineadsorptionstudiesontovarioustypesofadsorbents
AT sanabriagonzaleznancyrocio areviewofcaffeineadsorptionstudiesontovarioustypesofadsorbents
AT quinterojaramillojavierandres reviewofcaffeineadsorptionstudiesontovarioustypesofadsorbents
AT carreromantillajavierignacio reviewofcaffeineadsorptionstudiesontovarioustypesofadsorbents
AT sanabriagonzaleznancyrocio reviewofcaffeineadsorptionstudiesontovarioustypesofadsorbents