Cargando…
Clinical analysis of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study
OBJECTIVES: To explore the etiology, previous cardiac procedure methods and outcomes of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 41 patients who underwent aortic root replacement surgery in our hospital from February 2010 to February 2020 who underwent...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8316709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34321011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01587-8 |
_version_ | 1783729918672109568 |
---|---|
author | Deng, Jianying Zhong, Qianjin |
author_facet | Deng, Jianying Zhong, Qianjin |
author_sort | Deng, Jianying |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To explore the etiology, previous cardiac procedure methods and outcomes of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 41 patients who underwent aortic root replacement surgery in our hospital from February 2010 to February 2020 who underwent at least one cardiac surgery in the past, including 27 males and 14 females, with an average age of 49.5 ± 10.2 years old. Indications for reoperation include: aortic sinus dilation and ascending aortic aneurysm in 20 cases (48.8%), recurrent aortic dissection in 7 cases (17.1%), pseudoaneurysm of aortic root in 4 cases (9.8%), prosthetic valve endocarditis in 5 cases (12.2%) and paravalvular leakage in 5 cases (12.2%). According to whether the previous procedure involved aortic root surgery, they were divided into 2 groups, namely aortic root surgery-involved (ARS) group and non-aortic root surgery-involved (NRS) group. After the patients were discharged from hospitals, follow-ups were carried out through outpatient clinic or telephone for 5 years. Kaplan-Meier was used for survival analysis. RESULTS: All patients underwent Bentall procedure with a median sternum incision. Six patients (14.6%) died during the postoperative hospitalization and 3 patients (8.6%) died during the follow-up. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival in ARS group were 92.6, 92.6, and 92.6%, respectively; the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival in NRS group were 100, 85.7, and 85.7%, respectively. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the cause of redo aortic root replacement, procedure time, postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, hospital mortality, and 5-year cumulative survival (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Redo aortic root replacement is difficult and high risk. Bentall procedure is still a reliable surgical option for redo aortic root replacement, with good short- and mid-term results. The prognosis of redo aortic root replacement is not necessarily related to the etiology of patient’s surgery and the methods of previous cardiac procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8316709 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83167092021-07-28 Clinical analysis of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study Deng, Jianying Zhong, Qianjin J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article OBJECTIVES: To explore the etiology, previous cardiac procedure methods and outcomes of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 41 patients who underwent aortic root replacement surgery in our hospital from February 2010 to February 2020 who underwent at least one cardiac surgery in the past, including 27 males and 14 females, with an average age of 49.5 ± 10.2 years old. Indications for reoperation include: aortic sinus dilation and ascending aortic aneurysm in 20 cases (48.8%), recurrent aortic dissection in 7 cases (17.1%), pseudoaneurysm of aortic root in 4 cases (9.8%), prosthetic valve endocarditis in 5 cases (12.2%) and paravalvular leakage in 5 cases (12.2%). According to whether the previous procedure involved aortic root surgery, they were divided into 2 groups, namely aortic root surgery-involved (ARS) group and non-aortic root surgery-involved (NRS) group. After the patients were discharged from hospitals, follow-ups were carried out through outpatient clinic or telephone for 5 years. Kaplan-Meier was used for survival analysis. RESULTS: All patients underwent Bentall procedure with a median sternum incision. Six patients (14.6%) died during the postoperative hospitalization and 3 patients (8.6%) died during the follow-up. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival in ARS group were 92.6, 92.6, and 92.6%, respectively; the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival in NRS group were 100, 85.7, and 85.7%, respectively. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the cause of redo aortic root replacement, procedure time, postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, hospital mortality, and 5-year cumulative survival (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Redo aortic root replacement is difficult and high risk. Bentall procedure is still a reliable surgical option for redo aortic root replacement, with good short- and mid-term results. The prognosis of redo aortic root replacement is not necessarily related to the etiology of patient’s surgery and the methods of previous cardiac procedure. BioMed Central 2021-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8316709/ /pubmed/34321011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01587-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Deng, Jianying Zhong, Qianjin Clinical analysis of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study |
title | Clinical analysis of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study |
title_full | Clinical analysis of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study |
title_fullStr | Clinical analysis of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical analysis of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study |
title_short | Clinical analysis of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study |
title_sort | clinical analysis of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8316709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34321011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01587-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dengjianying clinicalanalysisofredoaorticrootreplacementaftercardiacsurgeryaretrospectivestudy AT zhongqianjin clinicalanalysisofredoaorticrootreplacementaftercardiacsurgeryaretrospectivestudy |