Cargando…

Clinical analysis of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVES: To explore the etiology, previous cardiac procedure methods and outcomes of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 41 patients who underwent aortic root replacement surgery in our hospital from February 2010 to February 2020 who underwent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deng, Jianying, Zhong, Qianjin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8316709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34321011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01587-8
_version_ 1783729918672109568
author Deng, Jianying
Zhong, Qianjin
author_facet Deng, Jianying
Zhong, Qianjin
author_sort Deng, Jianying
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To explore the etiology, previous cardiac procedure methods and outcomes of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 41 patients who underwent aortic root replacement surgery in our hospital from February 2010 to February 2020 who underwent at least one cardiac surgery in the past, including 27 males and 14 females, with an average age of 49.5 ± 10.2 years old. Indications for reoperation include: aortic sinus dilation and ascending aortic aneurysm in 20 cases (48.8%), recurrent aortic dissection in 7 cases (17.1%), pseudoaneurysm of aortic root in 4 cases (9.8%), prosthetic valve endocarditis in 5 cases (12.2%) and paravalvular leakage in 5 cases (12.2%). According to whether the previous procedure involved aortic root surgery, they were divided into 2 groups, namely aortic root surgery-involved (ARS) group and non-aortic root surgery-involved (NRS) group. After the patients were discharged from hospitals, follow-ups were carried out through outpatient clinic or telephone for 5 years. Kaplan-Meier was used for survival analysis. RESULTS: All patients underwent Bentall procedure with a median sternum incision. Six patients (14.6%) died during the postoperative hospitalization and 3 patients (8.6%) died during the follow-up. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival in ARS group were 92.6, 92.6, and 92.6%, respectively; the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival in NRS group were 100, 85.7, and 85.7%, respectively. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the cause of redo aortic root replacement, procedure time, postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, hospital mortality, and 5-year cumulative survival (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Redo aortic root replacement is difficult and high risk. Bentall procedure is still a reliable surgical option for redo aortic root replacement, with good short- and mid-term results. The prognosis of redo aortic root replacement is not necessarily related to the etiology of patient’s surgery and the methods of previous cardiac procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8316709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83167092021-07-28 Clinical analysis of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study Deng, Jianying Zhong, Qianjin J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article OBJECTIVES: To explore the etiology, previous cardiac procedure methods and outcomes of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 41 patients who underwent aortic root replacement surgery in our hospital from February 2010 to February 2020 who underwent at least one cardiac surgery in the past, including 27 males and 14 females, with an average age of 49.5 ± 10.2 years old. Indications for reoperation include: aortic sinus dilation and ascending aortic aneurysm in 20 cases (48.8%), recurrent aortic dissection in 7 cases (17.1%), pseudoaneurysm of aortic root in 4 cases (9.8%), prosthetic valve endocarditis in 5 cases (12.2%) and paravalvular leakage in 5 cases (12.2%). According to whether the previous procedure involved aortic root surgery, they were divided into 2 groups, namely aortic root surgery-involved (ARS) group and non-aortic root surgery-involved (NRS) group. After the patients were discharged from hospitals, follow-ups were carried out through outpatient clinic or telephone for 5 years. Kaplan-Meier was used for survival analysis. RESULTS: All patients underwent Bentall procedure with a median sternum incision. Six patients (14.6%) died during the postoperative hospitalization and 3 patients (8.6%) died during the follow-up. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival in ARS group were 92.6, 92.6, and 92.6%, respectively; the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival in NRS group were 100, 85.7, and 85.7%, respectively. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the cause of redo aortic root replacement, procedure time, postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, hospital mortality, and 5-year cumulative survival (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Redo aortic root replacement is difficult and high risk. Bentall procedure is still a reliable surgical option for redo aortic root replacement, with good short- and mid-term results. The prognosis of redo aortic root replacement is not necessarily related to the etiology of patient’s surgery and the methods of previous cardiac procedure. BioMed Central 2021-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8316709/ /pubmed/34321011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01587-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Deng, Jianying
Zhong, Qianjin
Clinical analysis of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study
title Clinical analysis of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study
title_full Clinical analysis of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Clinical analysis of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical analysis of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study
title_short Clinical analysis of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study
title_sort clinical analysis of redo aortic root replacement after cardiac surgery: a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8316709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34321011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-021-01587-8
work_keys_str_mv AT dengjianying clinicalanalysisofredoaorticrootreplacementaftercardiacsurgeryaretrospectivestudy
AT zhongqianjin clinicalanalysisofredoaorticrootreplacementaftercardiacsurgeryaretrospectivestudy