Cargando…
The current status and future directions of robotic pancreatectomy
Robotic surgery has emerged as an alternative to laparoscopic surgery and it has also been applied to pancreatectomy. With the increase in the number of robotic pancreatectomies, several studies comparing robotic pancreatectomy and conventional open or laparoscopic pancreatectomy have been published...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8316739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12446 |
_version_ | 1783729925317984256 |
---|---|
author | Nakata, Kohei Nakamura, Masafumi |
author_facet | Nakata, Kohei Nakamura, Masafumi |
author_sort | Nakata, Kohei |
collection | PubMed |
description | Robotic surgery has emerged as an alternative to laparoscopic surgery and it has also been applied to pancreatectomy. With the increase in the number of robotic pancreatectomies, several studies comparing robotic pancreatectomy and conventional open or laparoscopic pancreatectomy have been published. However, the use of robotic pancreatectomy remains controversial. In this review, we aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the current status of robotic pancreatectomy. Various aspects of robotic pancreatectomy and conventional open or laparoscopic pancreatectomy are compared, including the benefits, limitations, oncological efficacy, learning curves, and costs. Both robotic pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy have favorable or comparable outcomes to conventional procedures, and robotic pancreatectomy has the potential to be an alternative to open or laparoscopic procedures. However, there are still several disadvantages to robotic platforms, such as prolonged operative duration and the high cost of the procedure. These disadvantages will be improved by developing instruments, overcoming the learning curve, and increasing the number of robotic pancreatectomies. In addition, robotic pancreatectomy is still in the introductory period in most centers and should only be used in accordance with strict indications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8316739 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83167392021-07-31 The current status and future directions of robotic pancreatectomy Nakata, Kohei Nakamura, Masafumi Ann Gastroenterol Surg Review Articles Robotic surgery has emerged as an alternative to laparoscopic surgery and it has also been applied to pancreatectomy. With the increase in the number of robotic pancreatectomies, several studies comparing robotic pancreatectomy and conventional open or laparoscopic pancreatectomy have been published. However, the use of robotic pancreatectomy remains controversial. In this review, we aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the current status of robotic pancreatectomy. Various aspects of robotic pancreatectomy and conventional open or laparoscopic pancreatectomy are compared, including the benefits, limitations, oncological efficacy, learning curves, and costs. Both robotic pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy have favorable or comparable outcomes to conventional procedures, and robotic pancreatectomy has the potential to be an alternative to open or laparoscopic procedures. However, there are still several disadvantages to robotic platforms, such as prolonged operative duration and the high cost of the procedure. These disadvantages will be improved by developing instruments, overcoming the learning curve, and increasing the number of robotic pancreatectomies. In addition, robotic pancreatectomy is still in the introductory period in most centers and should only be used in accordance with strict indications. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8316739/ /pubmed/34337295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12446 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Nakata, Kohei Nakamura, Masafumi The current status and future directions of robotic pancreatectomy |
title | The current status and future directions of robotic pancreatectomy |
title_full | The current status and future directions of robotic pancreatectomy |
title_fullStr | The current status and future directions of robotic pancreatectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | The current status and future directions of robotic pancreatectomy |
title_short | The current status and future directions of robotic pancreatectomy |
title_sort | current status and future directions of robotic pancreatectomy |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8316739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12446 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakatakohei thecurrentstatusandfuturedirectionsofroboticpancreatectomy AT nakamuramasafumi thecurrentstatusandfuturedirectionsofroboticpancreatectomy AT nakatakohei currentstatusandfuturedirectionsofroboticpancreatectomy AT nakamuramasafumi currentstatusandfuturedirectionsofroboticpancreatectomy |