Cargando…

A New Method for Aortic Valve Planimetry with High-Resolution 3-Dimensional MRI and Its Comparison with Conventional Cine MRI and Echocardiography for Assessing the Severity of Aortic Valvular Stenosis

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the aortic valve area (AVA) calculated using fast high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) image acquisition with that of the conventional two-dimensional (2D) cine MR technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 139 consecutive patients (mean ag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hae Jin, Choe, Yeon Hyeon, Kim, Sung Mok, Kim, Eun Kyung, Lee, Mirae, Park, Sung-Ji, Ahn, Joonghyun, Carriere, Keumhee C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8316769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33938648
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.1218
_version_ 1783729932475564032
author Kim, Hae Jin
Choe, Yeon Hyeon
Kim, Sung Mok
Kim, Eun Kyung
Lee, Mirae
Park, Sung-Ji
Ahn, Joonghyun
Carriere, Keumhee C.
author_facet Kim, Hae Jin
Choe, Yeon Hyeon
Kim, Sung Mok
Kim, Eun Kyung
Lee, Mirae
Park, Sung-Ji
Ahn, Joonghyun
Carriere, Keumhee C.
author_sort Kim, Hae Jin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the aortic valve area (AVA) calculated using fast high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) image acquisition with that of the conventional two-dimensional (2D) cine MR technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 139 consecutive patients (mean age ± standard deviation [SD], 68.5 ± 9.4 years) with aortic valvular stenosis (AS) and 21 asymptomatic controls (52.3 ± 14.2 years). High-resolution T2-prepared 3D steady-state free precession (SSFP) images (2.0 mm slice thickness, 10 contiguous slices) for 3D planimetry (3DP) were acquired with a single breath hold during mid-systole. 2D SSFP cine MR images (6.0 mm slice thickness) for 2D planimetry (2DP) were also obtained at three aortic valve levels. The calculations for the effective AVA based on the MR images were compared with the transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) measurements using the continuity equation. RESULTS: The mean AVA ± SD derived by 3DP, 2DP, and TTE in the AS group were 0.81 ± 0.26 cm(2), 0.82 ± 0.34 cm(2), and 0.80 ± 0.26 cm(2), respectively (p = 0.366). The intra-observer agreement was higher for 3DP than 2DP in one observer: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94–0.97) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82–0.91), respectively, for observer 1 and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96–0.98) and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97–0.99), respectively, for observer 2. Inter-observer agreement was similar between 3DP and 2DP, with the ICC of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89–0.94) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88–0.93), respectively. 3DP-derived AVA showed a slightly higher agreement with AVA measured by TTE than the 2DP-derived AVA, with the ICC of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82–0.91) vs. 0.85 (95% CI, 0.79–0.89). CONCLUSION: High-resolution 3D MR image acquisition, with single-breath-hold SSFP sequences, gave AVA measurement with low observer variability that correlated highly with those obtained by TTE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8316769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Korean Society of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83167692021-08-03 A New Method for Aortic Valve Planimetry with High-Resolution 3-Dimensional MRI and Its Comparison with Conventional Cine MRI and Echocardiography for Assessing the Severity of Aortic Valvular Stenosis Kim, Hae Jin Choe, Yeon Hyeon Kim, Sung Mok Kim, Eun Kyung Lee, Mirae Park, Sung-Ji Ahn, Joonghyun Carriere, Keumhee C. Korean J Radiol Cardiovascular Imaging OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the aortic valve area (AVA) calculated using fast high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) image acquisition with that of the conventional two-dimensional (2D) cine MR technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 139 consecutive patients (mean age ± standard deviation [SD], 68.5 ± 9.4 years) with aortic valvular stenosis (AS) and 21 asymptomatic controls (52.3 ± 14.2 years). High-resolution T2-prepared 3D steady-state free precession (SSFP) images (2.0 mm slice thickness, 10 contiguous slices) for 3D planimetry (3DP) were acquired with a single breath hold during mid-systole. 2D SSFP cine MR images (6.0 mm slice thickness) for 2D planimetry (2DP) were also obtained at three aortic valve levels. The calculations for the effective AVA based on the MR images were compared with the transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) measurements using the continuity equation. RESULTS: The mean AVA ± SD derived by 3DP, 2DP, and TTE in the AS group were 0.81 ± 0.26 cm(2), 0.82 ± 0.34 cm(2), and 0.80 ± 0.26 cm(2), respectively (p = 0.366). The intra-observer agreement was higher for 3DP than 2DP in one observer: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94–0.97) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82–0.91), respectively, for observer 1 and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96–0.98) and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97–0.99), respectively, for observer 2. Inter-observer agreement was similar between 3DP and 2DP, with the ICC of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89–0.94) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88–0.93), respectively. 3DP-derived AVA showed a slightly higher agreement with AVA measured by TTE than the 2DP-derived AVA, with the ICC of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82–0.91) vs. 0.85 (95% CI, 0.79–0.89). CONCLUSION: High-resolution 3D MR image acquisition, with single-breath-hold SSFP sequences, gave AVA measurement with low observer variability that correlated highly with those obtained by TTE. The Korean Society of Radiology 2021-08 2021-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8316769/ /pubmed/33938648 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.1218 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Imaging
Kim, Hae Jin
Choe, Yeon Hyeon
Kim, Sung Mok
Kim, Eun Kyung
Lee, Mirae
Park, Sung-Ji
Ahn, Joonghyun
Carriere, Keumhee C.
A New Method for Aortic Valve Planimetry with High-Resolution 3-Dimensional MRI and Its Comparison with Conventional Cine MRI and Echocardiography for Assessing the Severity of Aortic Valvular Stenosis
title A New Method for Aortic Valve Planimetry with High-Resolution 3-Dimensional MRI and Its Comparison with Conventional Cine MRI and Echocardiography for Assessing the Severity of Aortic Valvular Stenosis
title_full A New Method for Aortic Valve Planimetry with High-Resolution 3-Dimensional MRI and Its Comparison with Conventional Cine MRI and Echocardiography for Assessing the Severity of Aortic Valvular Stenosis
title_fullStr A New Method for Aortic Valve Planimetry with High-Resolution 3-Dimensional MRI and Its Comparison with Conventional Cine MRI and Echocardiography for Assessing the Severity of Aortic Valvular Stenosis
title_full_unstemmed A New Method for Aortic Valve Planimetry with High-Resolution 3-Dimensional MRI and Its Comparison with Conventional Cine MRI and Echocardiography for Assessing the Severity of Aortic Valvular Stenosis
title_short A New Method for Aortic Valve Planimetry with High-Resolution 3-Dimensional MRI and Its Comparison with Conventional Cine MRI and Echocardiography for Assessing the Severity of Aortic Valvular Stenosis
title_sort new method for aortic valve planimetry with high-resolution 3-dimensional mri and its comparison with conventional cine mri and echocardiography for assessing the severity of aortic valvular stenosis
topic Cardiovascular Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8316769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33938648
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.1218
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhaejin anewmethodforaorticvalveplanimetrywithhighresolution3dimensionalmrianditscomparisonwithconventionalcinemriandechocardiographyforassessingtheseverityofaorticvalvularstenosis
AT choeyeonhyeon anewmethodforaorticvalveplanimetrywithhighresolution3dimensionalmrianditscomparisonwithconventionalcinemriandechocardiographyforassessingtheseverityofaorticvalvularstenosis
AT kimsungmok anewmethodforaorticvalveplanimetrywithhighresolution3dimensionalmrianditscomparisonwithconventionalcinemriandechocardiographyforassessingtheseverityofaorticvalvularstenosis
AT kimeunkyung anewmethodforaorticvalveplanimetrywithhighresolution3dimensionalmrianditscomparisonwithconventionalcinemriandechocardiographyforassessingtheseverityofaorticvalvularstenosis
AT leemirae anewmethodforaorticvalveplanimetrywithhighresolution3dimensionalmrianditscomparisonwithconventionalcinemriandechocardiographyforassessingtheseverityofaorticvalvularstenosis
AT parksungji anewmethodforaorticvalveplanimetrywithhighresolution3dimensionalmrianditscomparisonwithconventionalcinemriandechocardiographyforassessingtheseverityofaorticvalvularstenosis
AT ahnjoonghyun anewmethodforaorticvalveplanimetrywithhighresolution3dimensionalmrianditscomparisonwithconventionalcinemriandechocardiographyforassessingtheseverityofaorticvalvularstenosis
AT carrierekeumheec anewmethodforaorticvalveplanimetrywithhighresolution3dimensionalmrianditscomparisonwithconventionalcinemriandechocardiographyforassessingtheseverityofaorticvalvularstenosis
AT kimhaejin newmethodforaorticvalveplanimetrywithhighresolution3dimensionalmrianditscomparisonwithconventionalcinemriandechocardiographyforassessingtheseverityofaorticvalvularstenosis
AT choeyeonhyeon newmethodforaorticvalveplanimetrywithhighresolution3dimensionalmrianditscomparisonwithconventionalcinemriandechocardiographyforassessingtheseverityofaorticvalvularstenosis
AT kimsungmok newmethodforaorticvalveplanimetrywithhighresolution3dimensionalmrianditscomparisonwithconventionalcinemriandechocardiographyforassessingtheseverityofaorticvalvularstenosis
AT kimeunkyung newmethodforaorticvalveplanimetrywithhighresolution3dimensionalmrianditscomparisonwithconventionalcinemriandechocardiographyforassessingtheseverityofaorticvalvularstenosis
AT leemirae newmethodforaorticvalveplanimetrywithhighresolution3dimensionalmrianditscomparisonwithconventionalcinemriandechocardiographyforassessingtheseverityofaorticvalvularstenosis
AT parksungji newmethodforaorticvalveplanimetrywithhighresolution3dimensionalmrianditscomparisonwithconventionalcinemriandechocardiographyforassessingtheseverityofaorticvalvularstenosis
AT ahnjoonghyun newmethodforaorticvalveplanimetrywithhighresolution3dimensionalmrianditscomparisonwithconventionalcinemriandechocardiographyforassessingtheseverityofaorticvalvularstenosis
AT carrierekeumheec newmethodforaorticvalveplanimetrywithhighresolution3dimensionalmrianditscomparisonwithconventionalcinemriandechocardiographyforassessingtheseverityofaorticvalvularstenosis