Cargando…

Comparison of the Quality of Various Polychromatic and Monochromatic Dual-Energy CT Images with or without a Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm to Evaluate Total Knee Arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of various polychromatic and monochromatic images with or without using an iterative metal artifact reduction algorithm (iMAR) obtained from a dual-energy computed tomography (CT) to evaluate total knee arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 58 patients (2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choo, Hye Jung, Lee, Sun Joo, Kim, Dong Wook, Lee, Yoo Jin, Baek, Jin Wook, Han, Ji-yeon, Heo, Young Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8316773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34132074
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0548
_version_ 1783729933435011072
author Choo, Hye Jung
Lee, Sun Joo
Kim, Dong Wook
Lee, Yoo Jin
Baek, Jin Wook
Han, Ji-yeon
Heo, Young Jin
author_facet Choo, Hye Jung
Lee, Sun Joo
Kim, Dong Wook
Lee, Yoo Jin
Baek, Jin Wook
Han, Ji-yeon
Heo, Young Jin
author_sort Choo, Hye Jung
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of various polychromatic and monochromatic images with or without using an iterative metal artifact reduction algorithm (iMAR) obtained from a dual-energy computed tomography (CT) to evaluate total knee arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 58 patients (28 male and 30 female; mean age [range], 71.4 [61–83] years) who underwent 74 knee examinations after total knee arthroplasty using dual-energy CT. CT image sets consisted of polychromatic image sets that linearly blended 80 kVp and tin-filtered 140 kVp using weighting factors of 0.4, 0, and −0.3, and monochromatic images at 130, 150, 170, and 190 keV. These image sets were obtained with and without applying iMAR, creating a total of 14 image sets. Two readers qualitatively ranked the image quality (1 [lowest quality] through 14 [highest quality]). Volumes of high- and low-density artifacts and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) between the bone and fat tissue were quantitatively measured in a subset of 25 knees unaffected by metal artifacts. RESULTS: iMAR-applied, polychromatic images using weighting factors of −0.3 and 0.0 (P(−0.3i) and P(0.0i), respectively) showed the highest image-quality rank scores (median of 14 for both by one reader and 13 and 14, respectively, by the other reader; p < 0.001). All iMAR-applied image series showed higher rank scores than the iMAR-unapplied ones. The smallest volumes of low-density artifacts were found in P(−0.3i), P(0.0i), and iMAR-applied monochromatic images at 130 keV. The smallest volumes of high-density artifacts were noted in P(−0.3i). The CNRs were best in polychromatic images using a weighting factor of 0.4 with or without iMAR application, followed by polychromatic images using a weighting factor of 0.0 with or without iMAR application. CONCLUSION: Polychromatic images combined with iMAR application, P(−0.3i) and P(0.0i), provided better image qualities and substantial metal artifact reduction compared with other image sets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8316773
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Korean Society of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83167732021-08-03 Comparison of the Quality of Various Polychromatic and Monochromatic Dual-Energy CT Images with or without a Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm to Evaluate Total Knee Arthroplasty Choo, Hye Jung Lee, Sun Joo Kim, Dong Wook Lee, Yoo Jin Baek, Jin Wook Han, Ji-yeon Heo, Young Jin Korean J Radiol Musculoskeletal Imaging OBJECTIVE: To compare the quality of various polychromatic and monochromatic images with or without using an iterative metal artifact reduction algorithm (iMAR) obtained from a dual-energy computed tomography (CT) to evaluate total knee arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 58 patients (28 male and 30 female; mean age [range], 71.4 [61–83] years) who underwent 74 knee examinations after total knee arthroplasty using dual-energy CT. CT image sets consisted of polychromatic image sets that linearly blended 80 kVp and tin-filtered 140 kVp using weighting factors of 0.4, 0, and −0.3, and monochromatic images at 130, 150, 170, and 190 keV. These image sets were obtained with and without applying iMAR, creating a total of 14 image sets. Two readers qualitatively ranked the image quality (1 [lowest quality] through 14 [highest quality]). Volumes of high- and low-density artifacts and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) between the bone and fat tissue were quantitatively measured in a subset of 25 knees unaffected by metal artifacts. RESULTS: iMAR-applied, polychromatic images using weighting factors of −0.3 and 0.0 (P(−0.3i) and P(0.0i), respectively) showed the highest image-quality rank scores (median of 14 for both by one reader and 13 and 14, respectively, by the other reader; p < 0.001). All iMAR-applied image series showed higher rank scores than the iMAR-unapplied ones. The smallest volumes of low-density artifacts were found in P(−0.3i), P(0.0i), and iMAR-applied monochromatic images at 130 keV. The smallest volumes of high-density artifacts were noted in P(−0.3i). The CNRs were best in polychromatic images using a weighting factor of 0.4 with or without iMAR application, followed by polychromatic images using a weighting factor of 0.0 with or without iMAR application. CONCLUSION: Polychromatic images combined with iMAR application, P(−0.3i) and P(0.0i), provided better image qualities and substantial metal artifact reduction compared with other image sets. The Korean Society of Radiology 2021-08 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8316773/ /pubmed/34132074 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0548 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Musculoskeletal Imaging
Choo, Hye Jung
Lee, Sun Joo
Kim, Dong Wook
Lee, Yoo Jin
Baek, Jin Wook
Han, Ji-yeon
Heo, Young Jin
Comparison of the Quality of Various Polychromatic and Monochromatic Dual-Energy CT Images with or without a Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm to Evaluate Total Knee Arthroplasty
title Comparison of the Quality of Various Polychromatic and Monochromatic Dual-Energy CT Images with or without a Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm to Evaluate Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_full Comparison of the Quality of Various Polychromatic and Monochromatic Dual-Energy CT Images with or without a Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm to Evaluate Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Comparison of the Quality of Various Polychromatic and Monochromatic Dual-Energy CT Images with or without a Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm to Evaluate Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Quality of Various Polychromatic and Monochromatic Dual-Energy CT Images with or without a Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm to Evaluate Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_short Comparison of the Quality of Various Polychromatic and Monochromatic Dual-Energy CT Images with or without a Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm to Evaluate Total Knee Arthroplasty
title_sort comparison of the quality of various polychromatic and monochromatic dual-energy ct images with or without a metal artifact reduction algorithm to evaluate total knee arthroplasty
topic Musculoskeletal Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8316773/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34132074
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0548
work_keys_str_mv AT choohyejung comparisonofthequalityofvariouspolychromaticandmonochromaticdualenergyctimageswithorwithoutametalartifactreductionalgorithmtoevaluatetotalkneearthroplasty
AT leesunjoo comparisonofthequalityofvariouspolychromaticandmonochromaticdualenergyctimageswithorwithoutametalartifactreductionalgorithmtoevaluatetotalkneearthroplasty
AT kimdongwook comparisonofthequalityofvariouspolychromaticandmonochromaticdualenergyctimageswithorwithoutametalartifactreductionalgorithmtoevaluatetotalkneearthroplasty
AT leeyoojin comparisonofthequalityofvariouspolychromaticandmonochromaticdualenergyctimageswithorwithoutametalartifactreductionalgorithmtoevaluatetotalkneearthroplasty
AT baekjinwook comparisonofthequalityofvariouspolychromaticandmonochromaticdualenergyctimageswithorwithoutametalartifactreductionalgorithmtoevaluatetotalkneearthroplasty
AT hanjiyeon comparisonofthequalityofvariouspolychromaticandmonochromaticdualenergyctimageswithorwithoutametalartifactreductionalgorithmtoevaluatetotalkneearthroplasty
AT heoyoungjin comparisonofthequalityofvariouspolychromaticandmonochromaticdualenergyctimageswithorwithoutametalartifactreductionalgorithmtoevaluatetotalkneearthroplasty