Cargando…
Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Detecting Breast Cancer in the Diagnostic Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy for detecting breast cancer in the diagnostic setting between the use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), defined as DBT alone or combined DBT and digital mammography (DM), and the use of DM alone through a systematic review and meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METH...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Radiology
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8316775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34047504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.1227 |
_version_ | 1783729933941473280 |
---|---|
author | Ko, Min Jung Park, Dong A Kim, Sung Hyun Ko, Eun Sook Shin, Kyung Hwan Lim, Woosung Kwak, Beom Seok Chang, Jung Min |
author_facet | Ko, Min Jung Park, Dong A Kim, Sung Hyun Ko, Eun Sook Shin, Kyung Hwan Lim, Woosung Kwak, Beom Seok Chang, Jung Min |
author_sort | Ko, Min Jung |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy for detecting breast cancer in the diagnostic setting between the use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), defined as DBT alone or combined DBT and digital mammography (DM), and the use of DM alone through a systematic review and meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-Embase, Cochrane Library and five Korean local databases were searched for articles published until March 25, 2020. We selected studies that reported diagnostic accuracy in women who were recalled after screening or symptomatic. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. A bivariate random effects model was used to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity. We compared the diagnostic accuracy between DBT and DM alone using meta-regression and subgroup analyses by modality of intervention, country, existence of calcifications, breast density, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category threshold, study design, protocol for participant sampling, sample size, reason for diagnostic examination, and number of readers who interpreted the studies. RESULTS: Twenty studies (n = 44513) that compared DBT and DM alone were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86–0.93) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.84–0.94), respectively, for DBT, which were higher than 0.76 (95% CI 0.68–0.83) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.73–0.89), respectively, for DM alone (p < 0.001). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.95 (95% CI 0.93–0.97) for DBT and 0.86 (95% CI 0.82–0.88) for DM alone. The higher sensitivity and specificity of DBT than DM alone were consistently noted in most subgroup and meta-regression analyses. CONCLUSION: Use of DBT was more accurate than DM alone for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Women with clinical symptoms or abnormal screening findings could be more effectively evaluated for breast cancer using DBT, which has a superior diagnostic performance compared to DM alone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8316775 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Radiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83167752021-08-03 Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Detecting Breast Cancer in the Diagnostic Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Ko, Min Jung Park, Dong A Kim, Sung Hyun Ko, Eun Sook Shin, Kyung Hwan Lim, Woosung Kwak, Beom Seok Chang, Jung Min Korean J Radiol Breast Imaging OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy for detecting breast cancer in the diagnostic setting between the use of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), defined as DBT alone or combined DBT and digital mammography (DM), and the use of DM alone through a systematic review and meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-Embase, Cochrane Library and five Korean local databases were searched for articles published until March 25, 2020. We selected studies that reported diagnostic accuracy in women who were recalled after screening or symptomatic. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. A bivariate random effects model was used to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity. We compared the diagnostic accuracy between DBT and DM alone using meta-regression and subgroup analyses by modality of intervention, country, existence of calcifications, breast density, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category threshold, study design, protocol for participant sampling, sample size, reason for diagnostic examination, and number of readers who interpreted the studies. RESULTS: Twenty studies (n = 44513) that compared DBT and DM alone were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86–0.93) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.84–0.94), respectively, for DBT, which were higher than 0.76 (95% CI 0.68–0.83) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.73–0.89), respectively, for DM alone (p < 0.001). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.95 (95% CI 0.93–0.97) for DBT and 0.86 (95% CI 0.82–0.88) for DM alone. The higher sensitivity and specificity of DBT than DM alone were consistently noted in most subgroup and meta-regression analyses. CONCLUSION: Use of DBT was more accurate than DM alone for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Women with clinical symptoms or abnormal screening findings could be more effectively evaluated for breast cancer using DBT, which has a superior diagnostic performance compared to DM alone. The Korean Society of Radiology 2021-08 2021-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8316775/ /pubmed/34047504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.1227 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Breast Imaging Ko, Min Jung Park, Dong A Kim, Sung Hyun Ko, Eun Sook Shin, Kyung Hwan Lim, Woosung Kwak, Beom Seok Chang, Jung Min Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Detecting Breast Cancer in the Diagnostic Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Detecting Breast Cancer in the Diagnostic Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Detecting Breast Cancer in the Diagnostic Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Detecting Breast Cancer in the Diagnostic Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Detecting Breast Cancer in the Diagnostic Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Detecting Breast Cancer in the Diagnostic Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis for detecting breast cancer in the diagnostic setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Breast Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8316775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34047504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.1227 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kominjung accuracyofdigitalbreasttomosynthesisfordetectingbreastcancerinthediagnosticsettingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT parkdonga accuracyofdigitalbreasttomosynthesisfordetectingbreastcancerinthediagnosticsettingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kimsunghyun accuracyofdigitalbreasttomosynthesisfordetectingbreastcancerinthediagnosticsettingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT koeunsook accuracyofdigitalbreasttomosynthesisfordetectingbreastcancerinthediagnosticsettingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shinkyunghwan accuracyofdigitalbreasttomosynthesisfordetectingbreastcancerinthediagnosticsettingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT limwoosung accuracyofdigitalbreasttomosynthesisfordetectingbreastcancerinthediagnosticsettingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kwakbeomseok accuracyofdigitalbreasttomosynthesisfordetectingbreastcancerinthediagnosticsettingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT changjungmin accuracyofdigitalbreasttomosynthesisfordetectingbreastcancerinthediagnosticsettingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |