Cargando…

Robotic donor hepatectomy: Are we there yet?

In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) the safety of the live donor (LD) is of paramount importance. Despite all efforts, the morbidity rates approach 25%-40% with conventional open donor hepatectomy (DH) operations. However, most of these complications are related to the operative wound and d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rammohan, Ashwin, Rela, Mohamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8316848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34354800
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i7.668
_version_ 1783729949329326080
author Rammohan, Ashwin
Rela, Mohamed
author_facet Rammohan, Ashwin
Rela, Mohamed
author_sort Rammohan, Ashwin
collection PubMed
description In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) the safety of the live donor (LD) is of paramount importance. Despite all efforts, the morbidity rates approach 25%-40% with conventional open donor hepatectomy (DH) operations. However, most of these complications are related to the operative wound and despite increased self- esteem and satisfaction in various quality of life analyses on LD, the most common grievance is that of the scar. Performing safe and precise DH through a conventional laparoscopic approach is a formidable task with a precipitous learning curve for the whole team. Due to the ramifications the donor operation carries for the donor, the recipient, the transplant team and for the LDLT program in general, the development and acceptance of minimally invasive DH (MIDH) has been slow. The robotic surgical system overcomes the reduced visualization, restricted range of motion and physiological tremor associated with laparoscopic surgery and allows for a comparatively easier transition from technical feasibility to reproducibility. However, many questions especially with regards to standardization of surgical technique, comparison of outcomes, understanding of the learning curve, etc. remain unanswered. The aim of this review is to provide insights into the evolution of MIDH and highlight the current status of robotic DH, appreciating the existing challenges and its future role.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8316848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83168482021-08-04 Robotic donor hepatectomy: Are we there yet? Rammohan, Ashwin Rela, Mohamed World J Gastrointest Surg Minireviews In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) the safety of the live donor (LD) is of paramount importance. Despite all efforts, the morbidity rates approach 25%-40% with conventional open donor hepatectomy (DH) operations. However, most of these complications are related to the operative wound and despite increased self- esteem and satisfaction in various quality of life analyses on LD, the most common grievance is that of the scar. Performing safe and precise DH through a conventional laparoscopic approach is a formidable task with a precipitous learning curve for the whole team. Due to the ramifications the donor operation carries for the donor, the recipient, the transplant team and for the LDLT program in general, the development and acceptance of minimally invasive DH (MIDH) has been slow. The robotic surgical system overcomes the reduced visualization, restricted range of motion and physiological tremor associated with laparoscopic surgery and allows for a comparatively easier transition from technical feasibility to reproducibility. However, many questions especially with regards to standardization of surgical technique, comparison of outcomes, understanding of the learning curve, etc. remain unanswered. The aim of this review is to provide insights into the evolution of MIDH and highlight the current status of robotic DH, appreciating the existing challenges and its future role. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-07-27 2021-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8316848/ /pubmed/34354800 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i7.668 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Minireviews
Rammohan, Ashwin
Rela, Mohamed
Robotic donor hepatectomy: Are we there yet?
title Robotic donor hepatectomy: Are we there yet?
title_full Robotic donor hepatectomy: Are we there yet?
title_fullStr Robotic donor hepatectomy: Are we there yet?
title_full_unstemmed Robotic donor hepatectomy: Are we there yet?
title_short Robotic donor hepatectomy: Are we there yet?
title_sort robotic donor hepatectomy: are we there yet?
topic Minireviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8316848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34354800
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i7.668
work_keys_str_mv AT rammohanashwin roboticdonorhepatectomyarewethereyet
AT relamohamed roboticdonorhepatectomyarewethereyet