Cargando…
Robotic donor hepatectomy: Are we there yet?
In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) the safety of the live donor (LD) is of paramount importance. Despite all efforts, the morbidity rates approach 25%-40% with conventional open donor hepatectomy (DH) operations. However, most of these complications are related to the operative wound and d...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8316848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34354800 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i7.668 |
_version_ | 1783729949329326080 |
---|---|
author | Rammohan, Ashwin Rela, Mohamed |
author_facet | Rammohan, Ashwin Rela, Mohamed |
author_sort | Rammohan, Ashwin |
collection | PubMed |
description | In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) the safety of the live donor (LD) is of paramount importance. Despite all efforts, the morbidity rates approach 25%-40% with conventional open donor hepatectomy (DH) operations. However, most of these complications are related to the operative wound and despite increased self- esteem and satisfaction in various quality of life analyses on LD, the most common grievance is that of the scar. Performing safe and precise DH through a conventional laparoscopic approach is a formidable task with a precipitous learning curve for the whole team. Due to the ramifications the donor operation carries for the donor, the recipient, the transplant team and for the LDLT program in general, the development and acceptance of minimally invasive DH (MIDH) has been slow. The robotic surgical system overcomes the reduced visualization, restricted range of motion and physiological tremor associated with laparoscopic surgery and allows for a comparatively easier transition from technical feasibility to reproducibility. However, many questions especially with regards to standardization of surgical technique, comparison of outcomes, understanding of the learning curve, etc. remain unanswered. The aim of this review is to provide insights into the evolution of MIDH and highlight the current status of robotic DH, appreciating the existing challenges and its future role. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8316848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83168482021-08-04 Robotic donor hepatectomy: Are we there yet? Rammohan, Ashwin Rela, Mohamed World J Gastrointest Surg Minireviews In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) the safety of the live donor (LD) is of paramount importance. Despite all efforts, the morbidity rates approach 25%-40% with conventional open donor hepatectomy (DH) operations. However, most of these complications are related to the operative wound and despite increased self- esteem and satisfaction in various quality of life analyses on LD, the most common grievance is that of the scar. Performing safe and precise DH through a conventional laparoscopic approach is a formidable task with a precipitous learning curve for the whole team. Due to the ramifications the donor operation carries for the donor, the recipient, the transplant team and for the LDLT program in general, the development and acceptance of minimally invasive DH (MIDH) has been slow. The robotic surgical system overcomes the reduced visualization, restricted range of motion and physiological tremor associated with laparoscopic surgery and allows for a comparatively easier transition from technical feasibility to reproducibility. However, many questions especially with regards to standardization of surgical technique, comparison of outcomes, understanding of the learning curve, etc. remain unanswered. The aim of this review is to provide insights into the evolution of MIDH and highlight the current status of robotic DH, appreciating the existing challenges and its future role. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2021-07-27 2021-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8316848/ /pubmed/34354800 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i7.668 Text en ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Minireviews Rammohan, Ashwin Rela, Mohamed Robotic donor hepatectomy: Are we there yet? |
title | Robotic donor hepatectomy: Are we there yet? |
title_full | Robotic donor hepatectomy: Are we there yet? |
title_fullStr | Robotic donor hepatectomy: Are we there yet? |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic donor hepatectomy: Are we there yet? |
title_short | Robotic donor hepatectomy: Are we there yet? |
title_sort | robotic donor hepatectomy: are we there yet? |
topic | Minireviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8316848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34354800 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i7.668 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rammohanashwin roboticdonorhepatectomyarewethereyet AT relamohamed roboticdonorhepatectomyarewethereyet |