Cargando…
Applied sport science and medicine of women’s rugby codes: a systematic-scoping review and consensus on future research priorities protocol
Women’s rugby (rugby league, rugby union and rugby sevens) has recently grown in participation and professionalisation. There is under-representation of women-only cohorts within applied sport science and medicine research and within the women’s rugby evidence base. The aims of this article are: Par...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34394953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001108 |
_version_ | 1783729999056994304 |
---|---|
author | Heyward, Omar Emmonds, Stacey Roe, Gregory Scantlebury, Sean Stokes, Keith Jones, Ben |
author_facet | Heyward, Omar Emmonds, Stacey Roe, Gregory Scantlebury, Sean Stokes, Keith Jones, Ben |
author_sort | Heyward, Omar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Women’s rugby (rugby league, rugby union and rugby sevens) has recently grown in participation and professionalisation. There is under-representation of women-only cohorts within applied sport science and medicine research and within the women’s rugby evidence base. The aims of this article are: Part 1: to undertake a systematic-scoping review of the applied sport science and medicine of women’s rugby, and Part 2: to develop a consensus statement on future research priorities. This article will be designed in two parts: Part 1: a systematic-scoping review, and Part 2: a three-round Delphi consensus method. For Part 1, systematic searches of three electronic databases (PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, SPORTDiscus (EBSCOhost)) will be performed from the earliest record. These databases will be searched to identify any sport science and medicine themed studies within women’s rugby. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for Scoping Reviews will be adhered to. Part 2 involves a three-round Delphi consensus method to identify future research priorities. Identified experts in women’s rugby will be provided with overall findings from Part 1 to inform decision-making. Participants will then be asked to provide a list of research priority areas. Over the three rounds, priority areas achieving consensus (≥70% agreement) will be identified. This study has received institutional ethical approval. When complete, the manuscript will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The findings of this article will have relevance for a wide range of stakeholders in women’s rugby, including policymakers and governing bodies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8317073 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83170732021-08-13 Applied sport science and medicine of women’s rugby codes: a systematic-scoping review and consensus on future research priorities protocol Heyward, Omar Emmonds, Stacey Roe, Gregory Scantlebury, Sean Stokes, Keith Jones, Ben BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Protocol Women’s rugby (rugby league, rugby union and rugby sevens) has recently grown in participation and professionalisation. There is under-representation of women-only cohorts within applied sport science and medicine research and within the women’s rugby evidence base. The aims of this article are: Part 1: to undertake a systematic-scoping review of the applied sport science and medicine of women’s rugby, and Part 2: to develop a consensus statement on future research priorities. This article will be designed in two parts: Part 1: a systematic-scoping review, and Part 2: a three-round Delphi consensus method. For Part 1, systematic searches of three electronic databases (PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, SPORTDiscus (EBSCOhost)) will be performed from the earliest record. These databases will be searched to identify any sport science and medicine themed studies within women’s rugby. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for Scoping Reviews will be adhered to. Part 2 involves a three-round Delphi consensus method to identify future research priorities. Identified experts in women’s rugby will be provided with overall findings from Part 1 to inform decision-making. Participants will then be asked to provide a list of research priority areas. Over the three rounds, priority areas achieving consensus (≥70% agreement) will be identified. This study has received institutional ethical approval. When complete, the manuscript will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The findings of this article will have relevance for a wide range of stakeholders in women’s rugby, including policymakers and governing bodies. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8317073/ /pubmed/34394953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001108 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Protocol Heyward, Omar Emmonds, Stacey Roe, Gregory Scantlebury, Sean Stokes, Keith Jones, Ben Applied sport science and medicine of women’s rugby codes: a systematic-scoping review and consensus on future research priorities protocol |
title | Applied sport science and medicine of women’s rugby codes: a systematic-scoping review and consensus on future research priorities protocol |
title_full | Applied sport science and medicine of women’s rugby codes: a systematic-scoping review and consensus on future research priorities protocol |
title_fullStr | Applied sport science and medicine of women’s rugby codes: a systematic-scoping review and consensus on future research priorities protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Applied sport science and medicine of women’s rugby codes: a systematic-scoping review and consensus on future research priorities protocol |
title_short | Applied sport science and medicine of women’s rugby codes: a systematic-scoping review and consensus on future research priorities protocol |
title_sort | applied sport science and medicine of women’s rugby codes: a systematic-scoping review and consensus on future research priorities protocol |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34394953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001108 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heywardomar appliedsportscienceandmedicineofwomensrugbycodesasystematicscopingreviewandconsensusonfutureresearchprioritiesprotocol AT emmondsstacey appliedsportscienceandmedicineofwomensrugbycodesasystematicscopingreviewandconsensusonfutureresearchprioritiesprotocol AT roegregory appliedsportscienceandmedicineofwomensrugbycodesasystematicscopingreviewandconsensusonfutureresearchprioritiesprotocol AT scantleburysean appliedsportscienceandmedicineofwomensrugbycodesasystematicscopingreviewandconsensusonfutureresearchprioritiesprotocol AT stokeskeith appliedsportscienceandmedicineofwomensrugbycodesasystematicscopingreviewandconsensusonfutureresearchprioritiesprotocol AT jonesben appliedsportscienceandmedicineofwomensrugbycodesasystematicscopingreviewandconsensusonfutureresearchprioritiesprotocol |