Cargando…

术前规划联合荧光胸腔镜精准肺段手术较传统胸腔镜肺段手术治疗早期肺腺癌近期结果比较

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The mortality of lung cancer ranks first among all malignant tumors, but there are few studies on the effect of different segmentectomy on lung function in patients with early lung adenocarcinoma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the degree of lung function preserv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34120431
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2021.102.17
_version_ 1783730004490715136
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The mortality of lung cancer ranks first among all malignant tumors, but there are few studies on the effect of different segmentectomy on lung function in patients with early lung adenocarcinoma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the degree of lung function preservation and short-term results of preoperative planning combined with fluorescence thoracoscopic precision segmentectomy and traditional segmentectomy in patients with early lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS: From January 1, 2020 to October 31, 2020, 60 patients underwent thoracoscopic segmentectomy in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China: 30 patients in precision segmentectomy group and 30 patients in traditional segmentectomy group. The clinicopathological features, perioperative data and postoperative pulmonary function of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: The operation time of the precision group was shorter than that of the traditional group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The preoperative pulmonary function accuracy group and the traditional group in forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) and carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) were (3.65±0.63) L vs (3.54±0.64) L, (2.72±0.50) L vs (2.54±0.48) L and (20.36±3.02) mL/mmHg/min vs (19.16±3.18) mL/mmHg/min, respectively. One month after operation, the FVC, FEV(1) and DLCO of pulmonary function accuracy group and traditional group were (3.35±0.63) L vs (2.89±0.57) L, (2.39±0.54) L vs (2.09±0.48) L and (17.43±3.10) mL/mmHg/min vs (15.78±2.865) mL/mmHg/min, respectively. Three months after operation, the FVC and DLCO of pulmonary function accuracy group and traditional group were (3.47±0.63) L vs (3.20±0.56) L and (19.38±3.02) mL/mmHg/min vs (17.79±3.21) mL/mmHg/min, respectively. CONCLUSION: Preoperative planning combined with fluorescence thoracoscopic precise segmentectomy provides advantages in intersegmental plane recognition, vascular anatomy and postoperative recovery, which significantly shortens the operation time and makes the treatment more accurate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8317095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher 中国肺癌杂志编辑部
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83170952021-08-12 术前规划联合荧光胸腔镜精准肺段手术较传统胸腔镜肺段手术治疗早期肺腺癌近期结果比较 Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 临床研究 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The mortality of lung cancer ranks first among all malignant tumors, but there are few studies on the effect of different segmentectomy on lung function in patients with early lung adenocarcinoma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the degree of lung function preservation and short-term results of preoperative planning combined with fluorescence thoracoscopic precision segmentectomy and traditional segmentectomy in patients with early lung adenocarcinoma. METHODS: From January 1, 2020 to October 31, 2020, 60 patients underwent thoracoscopic segmentectomy in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China: 30 patients in precision segmentectomy group and 30 patients in traditional segmentectomy group. The clinicopathological features, perioperative data and postoperative pulmonary function of the two groups were compared. RESULTS: The operation time of the precision group was shorter than that of the traditional group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The preoperative pulmonary function accuracy group and the traditional group in forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) and carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) were (3.65±0.63) L vs (3.54±0.64) L, (2.72±0.50) L vs (2.54±0.48) L and (20.36±3.02) mL/mmHg/min vs (19.16±3.18) mL/mmHg/min, respectively. One month after operation, the FVC, FEV(1) and DLCO of pulmonary function accuracy group and traditional group were (3.35±0.63) L vs (2.89±0.57) L, (2.39±0.54) L vs (2.09±0.48) L and (17.43±3.10) mL/mmHg/min vs (15.78±2.865) mL/mmHg/min, respectively. Three months after operation, the FVC and DLCO of pulmonary function accuracy group and traditional group were (3.47±0.63) L vs (3.20±0.56) L and (19.38±3.02) mL/mmHg/min vs (17.79±3.21) mL/mmHg/min, respectively. CONCLUSION: Preoperative planning combined with fluorescence thoracoscopic precise segmentectomy provides advantages in intersegmental plane recognition, vascular anatomy and postoperative recovery, which significantly shortens the operation time and makes the treatment more accurate. 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2021-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8317095/ /pubmed/34120431 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2021.102.17 Text en 版权所有©《中国肺癌杂志》编辑部2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) License. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/.
spellingShingle 临床研究
术前规划联合荧光胸腔镜精准肺段手术较传统胸腔镜肺段手术治疗早期肺腺癌近期结果比较
title 术前规划联合荧光胸腔镜精准肺段手术较传统胸腔镜肺段手术治疗早期肺腺癌近期结果比较
title_full 术前规划联合荧光胸腔镜精准肺段手术较传统胸腔镜肺段手术治疗早期肺腺癌近期结果比较
title_fullStr 术前规划联合荧光胸腔镜精准肺段手术较传统胸腔镜肺段手术治疗早期肺腺癌近期结果比较
title_full_unstemmed 术前规划联合荧光胸腔镜精准肺段手术较传统胸腔镜肺段手术治疗早期肺腺癌近期结果比较
title_short 术前规划联合荧光胸腔镜精准肺段手术较传统胸腔镜肺段手术治疗早期肺腺癌近期结果比较
title_sort 术前规划联合荧光胸腔镜精准肺段手术较传统胸腔镜肺段手术治疗早期肺腺癌近期结果比较
topic 临床研究
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34120431
http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2021.102.17
work_keys_str_mv AT shùqiánguīhuàliánhéyíngguāngxiōngqiāngjìngjīngzhǔnfèiduànshǒushùjiàochuántǒngxiōngqiāngjìngfèiduànshǒushùzhìliáozǎoqīfèixiànáijìnqījiéguǒbǐjiào
AT shùqiánguīhuàliánhéyíngguāngxiōngqiāngjìngjīngzhǔnfèiduànshǒushùjiàochuántǒngxiōngqiāngjìngfèiduànshǒushùzhìliáozǎoqīfèixiànáijìnqījiéguǒbǐjiào
AT shùqiánguīhuàliánhéyíngguāngxiōngqiāngjìngjīngzhǔnfèiduànshǒushùjiàochuántǒngxiōngqiāngjìngfèiduànshǒushùzhìliáozǎoqīfèixiànáijìnqījiéguǒbǐjiào
AT shùqiánguīhuàliánhéyíngguāngxiōngqiāngjìngjīngzhǔnfèiduànshǒushùjiàochuántǒngxiōngqiāngjìngfèiduànshǒushùzhìliáozǎoqīfèixiànáijìnqījiéguǒbǐjiào
AT shùqiánguīhuàliánhéyíngguāngxiōngqiāngjìngjīngzhǔnfèiduànshǒushùjiàochuántǒngxiōngqiāngjìngfèiduànshǒushùzhìliáozǎoqīfèixiànáijìnqījiéguǒbǐjiào
AT shùqiánguīhuàliánhéyíngguāngxiōngqiāngjìngjīngzhǔnfèiduànshǒushùjiàochuántǒngxiōngqiāngjìngfèiduànshǒushùzhìliáozǎoqīfèixiànáijìnqījiéguǒbǐjiào
AT shùqiánguīhuàliánhéyíngguāngxiōngqiāngjìngjīngzhǔnfèiduànshǒushùjiàochuántǒngxiōngqiāngjìngfèiduànshǒushùzhìliáozǎoqīfèixiànáijìnqījiéguǒbǐjiào