Cargando…

Mucosal Healing Effectiveness and Safety of Anaprazole, a Novel PPI, vs. Rabeprazole in Patients With Duodenal Ulcers: A Randomized Double-Blinded Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are validated gastric acid suppressors and have been widely used to treat patients with active duodenal ulcers. Although existing PPIs have shown great efficacy, many scientists are still devoted to developing more effective PPIs with better safety profile....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shu, Xu, Zhu, Zhenhua, Fu, Yu, Zhang, Zhenyu, Wang, Jiangbin, Li, Xing, He, Shuixiang, Fan, Huizhen, Liu, Side, Zhang, Guoxin, Tang, Jianhua, Huang, Caibin, Du, Qin, Wang, Xiaoyan, Xu, Baohong, Du, Yiqi, Chen, Qikui, Wang, Bangmao, Chen, Ying, Duan, Xianghui, Xie, Yong, Huo, Lijuan, Hou, Xiaohua, Lu, Nonghua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34336894
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.690995
_version_ 1783730025919414272
author Shu, Xu
Zhu, Zhenhua
Fu, Yu
Zhang, Zhenyu
Wang, Jiangbin
Li, Xing
He, Shuixiang
Fan, Huizhen
Liu, Side
Zhang, Guoxin
Tang, Jianhua
Huang, Caibin
Du, Qin
Wang, Xiaoyan
Xu, Baohong
Du, Yiqi
Chen, Qikui
Wang, Bangmao
Chen, Ying
Duan, Xianghui
Xie, Yong
Huo, Lijuan
Hou, Xiaohua
Lu, Nonghua
author_facet Shu, Xu
Zhu, Zhenhua
Fu, Yu
Zhang, Zhenyu
Wang, Jiangbin
Li, Xing
He, Shuixiang
Fan, Huizhen
Liu, Side
Zhang, Guoxin
Tang, Jianhua
Huang, Caibin
Du, Qin
Wang, Xiaoyan
Xu, Baohong
Du, Yiqi
Chen, Qikui
Wang, Bangmao
Chen, Ying
Duan, Xianghui
Xie, Yong
Huo, Lijuan
Hou, Xiaohua
Lu, Nonghua
author_sort Shu, Xu
collection PubMed
description Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are validated gastric acid suppressors and have been widely used to treat patients with active duodenal ulcers. Although existing PPIs have shown great efficacy, many scientists are still devoted to developing more effective PPIs with better safety profile. Herein, we aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of anaprazole in duodenal mucosal healing, a novel PPI, to that of rabeprazole. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, positive-controlled, double-blinded, parallel-group phase II clinical trial, a total of 150 qualified patients with endoscopically confirmed active duodenal ulcers were randomized (1:1:1) to receive rabeprazole 10 mg, anaprazole 20 mg or anaprazole 40 mg for 4 weeks. The ulcer healing rates after 4 weeks of treatment were compared between groups by independent central review and investigator review. In addition, symptoms and safety were evaluated. Results: Based on the independent central review, the ulcer healing rates of the 10 mg rabeprazole, 20 mg anaprazole and 40 mg anaprazole groups were 88.0, 85.1, and 87.5%, respectively, in the FAS population and 88.9, 86.0, and 90.9%, respectively, in the PPS population. The ulcer healing rate difference between anaprazole 20 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg is −2.9% (95% CI, −16.5–10.7%), and −0.5% (95% CI, −13.5–12.5%) between anaprazole 40 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg, in the FAS population. Based on the investigator review, the ulcer healing rates of the 10 mg rabeprazole, 20 mg anaprazole, and 40 mg anaprazole groups were 72.0, 70.2, and 77.1%, respectively, in the FAS population and 75.6, 72.1, and 79.5%, respectively, in the PPS population. The ulcer healing rate difference between anaprazole 20 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg is −1.8% (95% CI, −19.8–16.3%), and 5.1% (95% CI, −12.2–22.3%) between anaprazole 40 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg, in the FAS population. Most patients (>90%) eventually achieved complete symptom relief. The incidence rates of adverse events were of no significant differences among the treatment groups. Potential possible better liver tolerance was observed in two anaprazole dose groups than rabeprazole 10 mg group. Conclusion: Both at a dosage of 20 and 40 mg daily, anaprazole, is effective with good safety profile in the treatment of active duodenal ulcers in this Phase 2 study, which allows anaprazole to be advanced to a phase III clinical trial. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT04503629&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=, Identifier: CTR20181464, NCT04503629.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8317206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83172062021-07-29 Mucosal Healing Effectiveness and Safety of Anaprazole, a Novel PPI, vs. Rabeprazole in Patients With Duodenal Ulcers: A Randomized Double-Blinded Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial Shu, Xu Zhu, Zhenhua Fu, Yu Zhang, Zhenyu Wang, Jiangbin Li, Xing He, Shuixiang Fan, Huizhen Liu, Side Zhang, Guoxin Tang, Jianhua Huang, Caibin Du, Qin Wang, Xiaoyan Xu, Baohong Du, Yiqi Chen, Qikui Wang, Bangmao Chen, Ying Duan, Xianghui Xie, Yong Huo, Lijuan Hou, Xiaohua Lu, Nonghua Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are validated gastric acid suppressors and have been widely used to treat patients with active duodenal ulcers. Although existing PPIs have shown great efficacy, many scientists are still devoted to developing more effective PPIs with better safety profile. Herein, we aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of anaprazole in duodenal mucosal healing, a novel PPI, to that of rabeprazole. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, positive-controlled, double-blinded, parallel-group phase II clinical trial, a total of 150 qualified patients with endoscopically confirmed active duodenal ulcers were randomized (1:1:1) to receive rabeprazole 10 mg, anaprazole 20 mg or anaprazole 40 mg for 4 weeks. The ulcer healing rates after 4 weeks of treatment were compared between groups by independent central review and investigator review. In addition, symptoms and safety were evaluated. Results: Based on the independent central review, the ulcer healing rates of the 10 mg rabeprazole, 20 mg anaprazole and 40 mg anaprazole groups were 88.0, 85.1, and 87.5%, respectively, in the FAS population and 88.9, 86.0, and 90.9%, respectively, in the PPS population. The ulcer healing rate difference between anaprazole 20 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg is −2.9% (95% CI, −16.5–10.7%), and −0.5% (95% CI, −13.5–12.5%) between anaprazole 40 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg, in the FAS population. Based on the investigator review, the ulcer healing rates of the 10 mg rabeprazole, 20 mg anaprazole, and 40 mg anaprazole groups were 72.0, 70.2, and 77.1%, respectively, in the FAS population and 75.6, 72.1, and 79.5%, respectively, in the PPS population. The ulcer healing rate difference between anaprazole 20 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg is −1.8% (95% CI, −19.8–16.3%), and 5.1% (95% CI, −12.2–22.3%) between anaprazole 40 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg, in the FAS population. Most patients (>90%) eventually achieved complete symptom relief. The incidence rates of adverse events were of no significant differences among the treatment groups. Potential possible better liver tolerance was observed in two anaprazole dose groups than rabeprazole 10 mg group. Conclusion: Both at a dosage of 20 and 40 mg daily, anaprazole, is effective with good safety profile in the treatment of active duodenal ulcers in this Phase 2 study, which allows anaprazole to be advanced to a phase III clinical trial. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT04503629&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=, Identifier: CTR20181464, NCT04503629. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8317206/ /pubmed/34336894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.690995 Text en Copyright © 2021 Shu, Zhu, Fu, Zhang, Wang, Li, He, Fan, Liu, Zhang, Tang, Huang, Du, Wang, Xu, Du, Chen, Wang, Chen, Duan, Xie, Huo, Hou and Lu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Shu, Xu
Zhu, Zhenhua
Fu, Yu
Zhang, Zhenyu
Wang, Jiangbin
Li, Xing
He, Shuixiang
Fan, Huizhen
Liu, Side
Zhang, Guoxin
Tang, Jianhua
Huang, Caibin
Du, Qin
Wang, Xiaoyan
Xu, Baohong
Du, Yiqi
Chen, Qikui
Wang, Bangmao
Chen, Ying
Duan, Xianghui
Xie, Yong
Huo, Lijuan
Hou, Xiaohua
Lu, Nonghua
Mucosal Healing Effectiveness and Safety of Anaprazole, a Novel PPI, vs. Rabeprazole in Patients With Duodenal Ulcers: A Randomized Double-Blinded Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial
title Mucosal Healing Effectiveness and Safety of Anaprazole, a Novel PPI, vs. Rabeprazole in Patients With Duodenal Ulcers: A Randomized Double-Blinded Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial
title_full Mucosal Healing Effectiveness and Safety of Anaprazole, a Novel PPI, vs. Rabeprazole in Patients With Duodenal Ulcers: A Randomized Double-Blinded Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Mucosal Healing Effectiveness and Safety of Anaprazole, a Novel PPI, vs. Rabeprazole in Patients With Duodenal Ulcers: A Randomized Double-Blinded Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Mucosal Healing Effectiveness and Safety of Anaprazole, a Novel PPI, vs. Rabeprazole in Patients With Duodenal Ulcers: A Randomized Double-Blinded Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial
title_short Mucosal Healing Effectiveness and Safety of Anaprazole, a Novel PPI, vs. Rabeprazole in Patients With Duodenal Ulcers: A Randomized Double-Blinded Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial
title_sort mucosal healing effectiveness and safety of anaprazole, a novel ppi, vs. rabeprazole in patients with duodenal ulcers: a randomized double-blinded multicenter phase ii clinical trial
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34336894
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.690995
work_keys_str_mv AT shuxu mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT zhuzhenhua mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT fuyu mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT zhangzhenyu mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT wangjiangbin mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT lixing mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT heshuixiang mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT fanhuizhen mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT liuside mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT zhangguoxin mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT tangjianhua mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT huangcaibin mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT duqin mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT wangxiaoyan mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT xubaohong mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT duyiqi mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT chenqikui mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT wangbangmao mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT chenying mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT duanxianghui mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT xieyong mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT huolijuan mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT houxiaohua mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial
AT lunonghua mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial