Cargando…
Mucosal Healing Effectiveness and Safety of Anaprazole, a Novel PPI, vs. Rabeprazole in Patients With Duodenal Ulcers: A Randomized Double-Blinded Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial
Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are validated gastric acid suppressors and have been widely used to treat patients with active duodenal ulcers. Although existing PPIs have shown great efficacy, many scientists are still devoted to developing more effective PPIs with better safety profile....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34336894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.690995 |
_version_ | 1783730025919414272 |
---|---|
author | Shu, Xu Zhu, Zhenhua Fu, Yu Zhang, Zhenyu Wang, Jiangbin Li, Xing He, Shuixiang Fan, Huizhen Liu, Side Zhang, Guoxin Tang, Jianhua Huang, Caibin Du, Qin Wang, Xiaoyan Xu, Baohong Du, Yiqi Chen, Qikui Wang, Bangmao Chen, Ying Duan, Xianghui Xie, Yong Huo, Lijuan Hou, Xiaohua Lu, Nonghua |
author_facet | Shu, Xu Zhu, Zhenhua Fu, Yu Zhang, Zhenyu Wang, Jiangbin Li, Xing He, Shuixiang Fan, Huizhen Liu, Side Zhang, Guoxin Tang, Jianhua Huang, Caibin Du, Qin Wang, Xiaoyan Xu, Baohong Du, Yiqi Chen, Qikui Wang, Bangmao Chen, Ying Duan, Xianghui Xie, Yong Huo, Lijuan Hou, Xiaohua Lu, Nonghua |
author_sort | Shu, Xu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are validated gastric acid suppressors and have been widely used to treat patients with active duodenal ulcers. Although existing PPIs have shown great efficacy, many scientists are still devoted to developing more effective PPIs with better safety profile. Herein, we aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of anaprazole in duodenal mucosal healing, a novel PPI, to that of rabeprazole. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, positive-controlled, double-blinded, parallel-group phase II clinical trial, a total of 150 qualified patients with endoscopically confirmed active duodenal ulcers were randomized (1:1:1) to receive rabeprazole 10 mg, anaprazole 20 mg or anaprazole 40 mg for 4 weeks. The ulcer healing rates after 4 weeks of treatment were compared between groups by independent central review and investigator review. In addition, symptoms and safety were evaluated. Results: Based on the independent central review, the ulcer healing rates of the 10 mg rabeprazole, 20 mg anaprazole and 40 mg anaprazole groups were 88.0, 85.1, and 87.5%, respectively, in the FAS population and 88.9, 86.0, and 90.9%, respectively, in the PPS population. The ulcer healing rate difference between anaprazole 20 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg is −2.9% (95% CI, −16.5–10.7%), and −0.5% (95% CI, −13.5–12.5%) between anaprazole 40 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg, in the FAS population. Based on the investigator review, the ulcer healing rates of the 10 mg rabeprazole, 20 mg anaprazole, and 40 mg anaprazole groups were 72.0, 70.2, and 77.1%, respectively, in the FAS population and 75.6, 72.1, and 79.5%, respectively, in the PPS population. The ulcer healing rate difference between anaprazole 20 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg is −1.8% (95% CI, −19.8–16.3%), and 5.1% (95% CI, −12.2–22.3%) between anaprazole 40 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg, in the FAS population. Most patients (>90%) eventually achieved complete symptom relief. The incidence rates of adverse events were of no significant differences among the treatment groups. Potential possible better liver tolerance was observed in two anaprazole dose groups than rabeprazole 10 mg group. Conclusion: Both at a dosage of 20 and 40 mg daily, anaprazole, is effective with good safety profile in the treatment of active duodenal ulcers in this Phase 2 study, which allows anaprazole to be advanced to a phase III clinical trial. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT04503629&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=, Identifier: CTR20181464, NCT04503629. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8317206 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83172062021-07-29 Mucosal Healing Effectiveness and Safety of Anaprazole, a Novel PPI, vs. Rabeprazole in Patients With Duodenal Ulcers: A Randomized Double-Blinded Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial Shu, Xu Zhu, Zhenhua Fu, Yu Zhang, Zhenyu Wang, Jiangbin Li, Xing He, Shuixiang Fan, Huizhen Liu, Side Zhang, Guoxin Tang, Jianhua Huang, Caibin Du, Qin Wang, Xiaoyan Xu, Baohong Du, Yiqi Chen, Qikui Wang, Bangmao Chen, Ying Duan, Xianghui Xie, Yong Huo, Lijuan Hou, Xiaohua Lu, Nonghua Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are validated gastric acid suppressors and have been widely used to treat patients with active duodenal ulcers. Although existing PPIs have shown great efficacy, many scientists are still devoted to developing more effective PPIs with better safety profile. Herein, we aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of anaprazole in duodenal mucosal healing, a novel PPI, to that of rabeprazole. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, positive-controlled, double-blinded, parallel-group phase II clinical trial, a total of 150 qualified patients with endoscopically confirmed active duodenal ulcers were randomized (1:1:1) to receive rabeprazole 10 mg, anaprazole 20 mg or anaprazole 40 mg for 4 weeks. The ulcer healing rates after 4 weeks of treatment were compared between groups by independent central review and investigator review. In addition, symptoms and safety were evaluated. Results: Based on the independent central review, the ulcer healing rates of the 10 mg rabeprazole, 20 mg anaprazole and 40 mg anaprazole groups were 88.0, 85.1, and 87.5%, respectively, in the FAS population and 88.9, 86.0, and 90.9%, respectively, in the PPS population. The ulcer healing rate difference between anaprazole 20 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg is −2.9% (95% CI, −16.5–10.7%), and −0.5% (95% CI, −13.5–12.5%) between anaprazole 40 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg, in the FAS population. Based on the investigator review, the ulcer healing rates of the 10 mg rabeprazole, 20 mg anaprazole, and 40 mg anaprazole groups were 72.0, 70.2, and 77.1%, respectively, in the FAS population and 75.6, 72.1, and 79.5%, respectively, in the PPS population. The ulcer healing rate difference between anaprazole 20 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg is −1.8% (95% CI, −19.8–16.3%), and 5.1% (95% CI, −12.2–22.3%) between anaprazole 40 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg, in the FAS population. Most patients (>90%) eventually achieved complete symptom relief. The incidence rates of adverse events were of no significant differences among the treatment groups. Potential possible better liver tolerance was observed in two anaprazole dose groups than rabeprazole 10 mg group. Conclusion: Both at a dosage of 20 and 40 mg daily, anaprazole, is effective with good safety profile in the treatment of active duodenal ulcers in this Phase 2 study, which allows anaprazole to be advanced to a phase III clinical trial. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT04503629&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=, Identifier: CTR20181464, NCT04503629. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8317206/ /pubmed/34336894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.690995 Text en Copyright © 2021 Shu, Zhu, Fu, Zhang, Wang, Li, He, Fan, Liu, Zhang, Tang, Huang, Du, Wang, Xu, Du, Chen, Wang, Chen, Duan, Xie, Huo, Hou and Lu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Shu, Xu Zhu, Zhenhua Fu, Yu Zhang, Zhenyu Wang, Jiangbin Li, Xing He, Shuixiang Fan, Huizhen Liu, Side Zhang, Guoxin Tang, Jianhua Huang, Caibin Du, Qin Wang, Xiaoyan Xu, Baohong Du, Yiqi Chen, Qikui Wang, Bangmao Chen, Ying Duan, Xianghui Xie, Yong Huo, Lijuan Hou, Xiaohua Lu, Nonghua Mucosal Healing Effectiveness and Safety of Anaprazole, a Novel PPI, vs. Rabeprazole in Patients With Duodenal Ulcers: A Randomized Double-Blinded Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial |
title | Mucosal Healing Effectiveness and Safety of Anaprazole, a Novel PPI, vs. Rabeprazole in Patients With Duodenal Ulcers: A Randomized Double-Blinded Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial |
title_full | Mucosal Healing Effectiveness and Safety of Anaprazole, a Novel PPI, vs. Rabeprazole in Patients With Duodenal Ulcers: A Randomized Double-Blinded Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Mucosal Healing Effectiveness and Safety of Anaprazole, a Novel PPI, vs. Rabeprazole in Patients With Duodenal Ulcers: A Randomized Double-Blinded Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Mucosal Healing Effectiveness and Safety of Anaprazole, a Novel PPI, vs. Rabeprazole in Patients With Duodenal Ulcers: A Randomized Double-Blinded Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial |
title_short | Mucosal Healing Effectiveness and Safety of Anaprazole, a Novel PPI, vs. Rabeprazole in Patients With Duodenal Ulcers: A Randomized Double-Blinded Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial |
title_sort | mucosal healing effectiveness and safety of anaprazole, a novel ppi, vs. rabeprazole in patients with duodenal ulcers: a randomized double-blinded multicenter phase ii clinical trial |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317206/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34336894 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.690995 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shuxu mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT zhuzhenhua mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT fuyu mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT zhangzhenyu mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT wangjiangbin mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT lixing mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT heshuixiang mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT fanhuizhen mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT liuside mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT zhangguoxin mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT tangjianhua mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT huangcaibin mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT duqin mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT wangxiaoyan mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT xubaohong mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT duyiqi mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT chenqikui mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT wangbangmao mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT chenying mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT duanxianghui mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT xieyong mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT huolijuan mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT houxiaohua mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial AT lunonghua mucosalhealingeffectivenessandsafetyofanaprazoleanovelppivsrabeprazoleinpatientswithduodenalulcersarandomizeddoubleblindedmulticenterphaseiiclinicaltrial |