Cargando…

Machine Learning to Identify Metabolic Subtypes of Obesity: A Multi-Center Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Clinical characteristics of obesity are heterogenous, but current classification for diagnosis is simply based on BMI or metabolic healthiness. The purpose of this study was to use machine learning to explore a more precise classification of obesity subgroups towards inform...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Ziwei, Feng, Wenhuan, Liu, Yanjun, Ma, Chiye, Arefan, Dooman, Zhou, Donglei, Cheng, Xiaoyun, Yu, Jiahui, Gao, Long, Du, Lei, You, Hui, Zhu, Jiangfan, Zhu, Dalong, Wu, Shandong, Qu, Shen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335479
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.713592
_version_ 1783730028463259648
author Lin, Ziwei
Feng, Wenhuan
Liu, Yanjun
Ma, Chiye
Arefan, Dooman
Zhou, Donglei
Cheng, Xiaoyun
Yu, Jiahui
Gao, Long
Du, Lei
You, Hui
Zhu, Jiangfan
Zhu, Dalong
Wu, Shandong
Qu, Shen
author_facet Lin, Ziwei
Feng, Wenhuan
Liu, Yanjun
Ma, Chiye
Arefan, Dooman
Zhou, Donglei
Cheng, Xiaoyun
Yu, Jiahui
Gao, Long
Du, Lei
You, Hui
Zhu, Jiangfan
Zhu, Dalong
Wu, Shandong
Qu, Shen
author_sort Lin, Ziwei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Clinical characteristics of obesity are heterogenous, but current classification for diagnosis is simply based on BMI or metabolic healthiness. The purpose of this study was to use machine learning to explore a more precise classification of obesity subgroups towards informing individualized therapy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In a multi-center study (n=2495), we used unsupervised machine learning to cluster patients with obesity from Shanghai Tenth People’s hospital (n=882, main cohort) based on three clinical variables (AUCs of glucose and of insulin during OGTT, and uric acid). Verification of the clustering was performed in three independent cohorts from external hospitals in China (n = 130, 137, and 289, respectively). Statistics of a healthy normal-weight cohort (n=1057) were measured as controls. RESULTS: Machine learning revealed four stable metabolic different obese clusters on each cohort. Metabolic healthy obesity (MHO, 44% patients) was characterized by a relatively healthy-metabolic status with lowest incidents of comorbidities. Hypermetabolic obesity-hyperuricemia (HMO-U, 33% patients) was characterized by extremely high uric acid and a large increased incidence of hyperuricemia (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 73.67 to MHO, 95%CI 35.46-153.06). Hypermetabolic obesity-hyperinsulinemia (HMO-I, 8% patients) was distinguished by overcompensated insulin secretion and a large increased incidence of polycystic ovary syndrome (AOR 14.44 to MHO, 95%CI 1.75-118.99). Hypometabolic obesity (LMO, 15% patients) was characterized by extremely high glucose, decompensated insulin secretion, and the worst glucolipid metabolism (diabetes: AOR 105.85 to MHO, 95%CI 42.00-266.74; metabolic syndrome: AOR 13.50 to MHO, 95%CI 7.34-24.83). The assignment of patients in the verification cohorts to the main model showed a mean accuracy of 0.941 in all clusters. CONCLUSION: Machine learning automatically identified four subtypes of obesity in terms of clinical characteristics on four independent patient cohorts. This proof-of-concept study provided evidence that precise diagnosis of obesity is feasible to potentially guide therapeutic planning and decisions for different subtypes of obesity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04282837.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8317220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83172202021-07-29 Machine Learning to Identify Metabolic Subtypes of Obesity: A Multi-Center Study Lin, Ziwei Feng, Wenhuan Liu, Yanjun Ma, Chiye Arefan, Dooman Zhou, Donglei Cheng, Xiaoyun Yu, Jiahui Gao, Long Du, Lei You, Hui Zhu, Jiangfan Zhu, Dalong Wu, Shandong Qu, Shen Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Clinical characteristics of obesity are heterogenous, but current classification for diagnosis is simply based on BMI or metabolic healthiness. The purpose of this study was to use machine learning to explore a more precise classification of obesity subgroups towards informing individualized therapy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In a multi-center study (n=2495), we used unsupervised machine learning to cluster patients with obesity from Shanghai Tenth People’s hospital (n=882, main cohort) based on three clinical variables (AUCs of glucose and of insulin during OGTT, and uric acid). Verification of the clustering was performed in three independent cohorts from external hospitals in China (n = 130, 137, and 289, respectively). Statistics of a healthy normal-weight cohort (n=1057) were measured as controls. RESULTS: Machine learning revealed four stable metabolic different obese clusters on each cohort. Metabolic healthy obesity (MHO, 44% patients) was characterized by a relatively healthy-metabolic status with lowest incidents of comorbidities. Hypermetabolic obesity-hyperuricemia (HMO-U, 33% patients) was characterized by extremely high uric acid and a large increased incidence of hyperuricemia (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 73.67 to MHO, 95%CI 35.46-153.06). Hypermetabolic obesity-hyperinsulinemia (HMO-I, 8% patients) was distinguished by overcompensated insulin secretion and a large increased incidence of polycystic ovary syndrome (AOR 14.44 to MHO, 95%CI 1.75-118.99). Hypometabolic obesity (LMO, 15% patients) was characterized by extremely high glucose, decompensated insulin secretion, and the worst glucolipid metabolism (diabetes: AOR 105.85 to MHO, 95%CI 42.00-266.74; metabolic syndrome: AOR 13.50 to MHO, 95%CI 7.34-24.83). The assignment of patients in the verification cohorts to the main model showed a mean accuracy of 0.941 in all clusters. CONCLUSION: Machine learning automatically identified four subtypes of obesity in terms of clinical characteristics on four independent patient cohorts. This proof-of-concept study provided evidence that precise diagnosis of obesity is feasible to potentially guide therapeutic planning and decisions for different subtypes of obesity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04282837. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8317220/ /pubmed/34335479 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.713592 Text en Copyright © 2021 Lin, Feng, Liu, Ma, Arefan, Zhou, Cheng, Yu, Gao, Du, You, Zhu, Zhu, Wu and Qu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Lin, Ziwei
Feng, Wenhuan
Liu, Yanjun
Ma, Chiye
Arefan, Dooman
Zhou, Donglei
Cheng, Xiaoyun
Yu, Jiahui
Gao, Long
Du, Lei
You, Hui
Zhu, Jiangfan
Zhu, Dalong
Wu, Shandong
Qu, Shen
Machine Learning to Identify Metabolic Subtypes of Obesity: A Multi-Center Study
title Machine Learning to Identify Metabolic Subtypes of Obesity: A Multi-Center Study
title_full Machine Learning to Identify Metabolic Subtypes of Obesity: A Multi-Center Study
title_fullStr Machine Learning to Identify Metabolic Subtypes of Obesity: A Multi-Center Study
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning to Identify Metabolic Subtypes of Obesity: A Multi-Center Study
title_short Machine Learning to Identify Metabolic Subtypes of Obesity: A Multi-Center Study
title_sort machine learning to identify metabolic subtypes of obesity: a multi-center study
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335479
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.713592
work_keys_str_mv AT linziwei machinelearningtoidentifymetabolicsubtypesofobesityamulticenterstudy
AT fengwenhuan machinelearningtoidentifymetabolicsubtypesofobesityamulticenterstudy
AT liuyanjun machinelearningtoidentifymetabolicsubtypesofobesityamulticenterstudy
AT machiye machinelearningtoidentifymetabolicsubtypesofobesityamulticenterstudy
AT arefandooman machinelearningtoidentifymetabolicsubtypesofobesityamulticenterstudy
AT zhoudonglei machinelearningtoidentifymetabolicsubtypesofobesityamulticenterstudy
AT chengxiaoyun machinelearningtoidentifymetabolicsubtypesofobesityamulticenterstudy
AT yujiahui machinelearningtoidentifymetabolicsubtypesofobesityamulticenterstudy
AT gaolong machinelearningtoidentifymetabolicsubtypesofobesityamulticenterstudy
AT dulei machinelearningtoidentifymetabolicsubtypesofobesityamulticenterstudy
AT youhui machinelearningtoidentifymetabolicsubtypesofobesityamulticenterstudy
AT zhujiangfan machinelearningtoidentifymetabolicsubtypesofobesityamulticenterstudy
AT zhudalong machinelearningtoidentifymetabolicsubtypesofobesityamulticenterstudy
AT wushandong machinelearningtoidentifymetabolicsubtypesofobesityamulticenterstudy
AT qushen machinelearningtoidentifymetabolicsubtypesofobesityamulticenterstudy