Cargando…
An international multidisciplinary peer-driven consensus on the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgical practice
Bleeding is a consequence of insufficient hemostasis and excessive bleeding at a surgical site is associated with an increased risk of post-operative infection, transfusion and re-operation, in addition to increased hospital length of stay and costs. Surgeons employ a range of methods to achieve hem...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317684/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01136-x |
_version_ | 1783730116566712320 |
---|---|
author | Eden, C. Buonomo, O. C. Busch, J. Gilabert-Estelles, J. Medrano, R. Nosotti, M. Renaud, S. Walker, I. Williams, N. Carlini, Massimo |
author_facet | Eden, C. Buonomo, O. C. Busch, J. Gilabert-Estelles, J. Medrano, R. Nosotti, M. Renaud, S. Walker, I. Williams, N. Carlini, Massimo |
author_sort | Eden, C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bleeding is a consequence of insufficient hemostasis and excessive bleeding at a surgical site is associated with an increased risk of post-operative infection, transfusion and re-operation, in addition to increased hospital length of stay and costs. Surgeons employ a range of methods to achieve hemostasis, including topical hemostatic agents of differing composition and properties. Hemostatic powders are a sub-group of topical hemostats, which can be used in helping as adjuncts to manage troublesome bleeding in a variety of situations. As this technology is relatively new and potentially not well known by the broad surgical community, no specific guidelines or recommendations for the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgery currently exist. A steering group throughout Europe of multidisciplinary surgeons, expert in hemostasis and hemostatics, identified from literature and from personal experience, five key topics. When to use hemostatic powder, the evidence for use, benefits of use, safety remarks and considerations in various surgical specialties. Thirty-seven statements were subsequently drawn from these five key topics. An online survey was sent to 128 high-volume surgeons working in breast surgery, gynaecological and obstetric surgery, general and emergency surgery, thoracic surgery and urological surgery in Europe to assess agreement (consensus) with these statements. Consensus was defined as high if ≥ 75% and very high if ≥ 90% of respondents agreed with a statement. A total of 79 responses were received and consensus among the surgical experts was very high in 27 (73%) statements, high in 8 (22%) statements and was not achieved in 2 (5%) statements. Based on the consensus scores, the steering group produced 16 key recommendations which they considered could improve patient outcomes by reducing post-operative bleeding and its associated complications using hemostatic powder. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13304-021-01136-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8317684 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83176842021-07-29 An international multidisciplinary peer-driven consensus on the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgical practice Eden, C. Buonomo, O. C. Busch, J. Gilabert-Estelles, J. Medrano, R. Nosotti, M. Renaud, S. Walker, I. Williams, N. Carlini, Massimo Updates Surg Position Paper Bleeding is a consequence of insufficient hemostasis and excessive bleeding at a surgical site is associated with an increased risk of post-operative infection, transfusion and re-operation, in addition to increased hospital length of stay and costs. Surgeons employ a range of methods to achieve hemostasis, including topical hemostatic agents of differing composition and properties. Hemostatic powders are a sub-group of topical hemostats, which can be used in helping as adjuncts to manage troublesome bleeding in a variety of situations. As this technology is relatively new and potentially not well known by the broad surgical community, no specific guidelines or recommendations for the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgery currently exist. A steering group throughout Europe of multidisciplinary surgeons, expert in hemostasis and hemostatics, identified from literature and from personal experience, five key topics. When to use hemostatic powder, the evidence for use, benefits of use, safety remarks and considerations in various surgical specialties. Thirty-seven statements were subsequently drawn from these five key topics. An online survey was sent to 128 high-volume surgeons working in breast surgery, gynaecological and obstetric surgery, general and emergency surgery, thoracic surgery and urological surgery in Europe to assess agreement (consensus) with these statements. Consensus was defined as high if ≥ 75% and very high if ≥ 90% of respondents agreed with a statement. A total of 79 responses were received and consensus among the surgical experts was very high in 27 (73%) statements, high in 8 (22%) statements and was not achieved in 2 (5%) statements. Based on the consensus scores, the steering group produced 16 key recommendations which they considered could improve patient outcomes by reducing post-operative bleeding and its associated complications using hemostatic powder. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13304-021-01136-x. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-28 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8317684/ /pubmed/34322783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01136-x Text en © Italian Society of Surgery (SIC) 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Position Paper Eden, C. Buonomo, O. C. Busch, J. Gilabert-Estelles, J. Medrano, R. Nosotti, M. Renaud, S. Walker, I. Williams, N. Carlini, Massimo An international multidisciplinary peer-driven consensus on the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgical practice |
title | An international multidisciplinary peer-driven consensus on the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgical practice |
title_full | An international multidisciplinary peer-driven consensus on the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgical practice |
title_fullStr | An international multidisciplinary peer-driven consensus on the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgical practice |
title_full_unstemmed | An international multidisciplinary peer-driven consensus on the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgical practice |
title_short | An international multidisciplinary peer-driven consensus on the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgical practice |
title_sort | international multidisciplinary peer-driven consensus on the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgical practice |
topic | Position Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317684/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01136-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT edenc aninternationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice AT buonomooc aninternationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice AT buschj aninternationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice AT gilabertestellesj aninternationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice AT medranor aninternationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice AT nosottim aninternationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice AT renauds aninternationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice AT walkeri aninternationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice AT williamsn aninternationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice AT carlinimassimo aninternationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice AT edenc internationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice AT buonomooc internationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice AT buschj internationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice AT gilabertestellesj internationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice AT medranor internationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice AT nosottim internationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice AT renauds internationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice AT walkeri internationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice AT williamsn internationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice AT carlinimassimo internationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice |