Cargando…

An international multidisciplinary peer-driven consensus on the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgical practice

Bleeding is a consequence of insufficient hemostasis and excessive bleeding at a surgical site is associated with an increased risk of post-operative infection, transfusion and re-operation, in addition to increased hospital length of stay and costs. Surgeons employ a range of methods to achieve hem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eden, C., Buonomo, O. C., Busch, J., Gilabert-Estelles, J., Medrano, R., Nosotti, M., Renaud, S., Walker, I., Williams, N., Carlini, Massimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01136-x
_version_ 1783730116566712320
author Eden, C.
Buonomo, O. C.
Busch, J.
Gilabert-Estelles, J.
Medrano, R.
Nosotti, M.
Renaud, S.
Walker, I.
Williams, N.
Carlini, Massimo
author_facet Eden, C.
Buonomo, O. C.
Busch, J.
Gilabert-Estelles, J.
Medrano, R.
Nosotti, M.
Renaud, S.
Walker, I.
Williams, N.
Carlini, Massimo
author_sort Eden, C.
collection PubMed
description Bleeding is a consequence of insufficient hemostasis and excessive bleeding at a surgical site is associated with an increased risk of post-operative infection, transfusion and re-operation, in addition to increased hospital length of stay and costs. Surgeons employ a range of methods to achieve hemostasis, including topical hemostatic agents of differing composition and properties. Hemostatic powders are a sub-group of topical hemostats, which can be used in helping as adjuncts to manage troublesome bleeding in a variety of situations. As this technology is relatively new and potentially not well known by the broad surgical community, no specific guidelines or recommendations for the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgery currently exist. A steering group throughout Europe of multidisciplinary surgeons, expert in hemostasis and hemostatics, identified from literature and from personal experience, five key topics. When to use hemostatic powder, the evidence for use, benefits of use, safety remarks and considerations in various surgical specialties. Thirty-seven statements were subsequently drawn from these five key topics. An online survey was sent to 128 high-volume surgeons working in breast surgery, gynaecological and obstetric surgery, general and emergency surgery, thoracic surgery and urological surgery in Europe to assess agreement (consensus) with these statements. Consensus was defined as high if ≥ 75% and very high if ≥ 90% of respondents agreed with a statement. A total of 79 responses were received and consensus among the surgical experts was very high in 27 (73%) statements, high in 8 (22%) statements and was not achieved in 2 (5%) statements. Based on the consensus scores, the steering group produced 16 key recommendations which they considered could improve patient outcomes by reducing post-operative bleeding and its associated complications using hemostatic powder. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13304-021-01136-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8317684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83176842021-07-29 An international multidisciplinary peer-driven consensus on the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgical practice Eden, C. Buonomo, O. C. Busch, J. Gilabert-Estelles, J. Medrano, R. Nosotti, M. Renaud, S. Walker, I. Williams, N. Carlini, Massimo Updates Surg Position Paper Bleeding is a consequence of insufficient hemostasis and excessive bleeding at a surgical site is associated with an increased risk of post-operative infection, transfusion and re-operation, in addition to increased hospital length of stay and costs. Surgeons employ a range of methods to achieve hemostasis, including topical hemostatic agents of differing composition and properties. Hemostatic powders are a sub-group of topical hemostats, which can be used in helping as adjuncts to manage troublesome bleeding in a variety of situations. As this technology is relatively new and potentially not well known by the broad surgical community, no specific guidelines or recommendations for the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgery currently exist. A steering group throughout Europe of multidisciplinary surgeons, expert in hemostasis and hemostatics, identified from literature and from personal experience, five key topics. When to use hemostatic powder, the evidence for use, benefits of use, safety remarks and considerations in various surgical specialties. Thirty-seven statements were subsequently drawn from these five key topics. An online survey was sent to 128 high-volume surgeons working in breast surgery, gynaecological and obstetric surgery, general and emergency surgery, thoracic surgery and urological surgery in Europe to assess agreement (consensus) with these statements. Consensus was defined as high if ≥ 75% and very high if ≥ 90% of respondents agreed with a statement. A total of 79 responses were received and consensus among the surgical experts was very high in 27 (73%) statements, high in 8 (22%) statements and was not achieved in 2 (5%) statements. Based on the consensus scores, the steering group produced 16 key recommendations which they considered could improve patient outcomes by reducing post-operative bleeding and its associated complications using hemostatic powder. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13304-021-01136-x. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-28 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8317684/ /pubmed/34322783 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01136-x Text en © Italian Society of Surgery (SIC) 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Position Paper
Eden, C.
Buonomo, O. C.
Busch, J.
Gilabert-Estelles, J.
Medrano, R.
Nosotti, M.
Renaud, S.
Walker, I.
Williams, N.
Carlini, Massimo
An international multidisciplinary peer-driven consensus on the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgical practice
title An international multidisciplinary peer-driven consensus on the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgical practice
title_full An international multidisciplinary peer-driven consensus on the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgical practice
title_fullStr An international multidisciplinary peer-driven consensus on the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgical practice
title_full_unstemmed An international multidisciplinary peer-driven consensus on the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgical practice
title_short An international multidisciplinary peer-driven consensus on the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgical practice
title_sort international multidisciplinary peer-driven consensus on the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgical practice
topic Position Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01136-x
work_keys_str_mv AT edenc aninternationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice
AT buonomooc aninternationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice
AT buschj aninternationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice
AT gilabertestellesj aninternationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice
AT medranor aninternationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice
AT nosottim aninternationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice
AT renauds aninternationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice
AT walkeri aninternationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice
AT williamsn aninternationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice
AT carlinimassimo aninternationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice
AT edenc internationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice
AT buonomooc internationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice
AT buschj internationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice
AT gilabertestellesj internationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice
AT medranor internationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice
AT nosottim internationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice
AT renauds internationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice
AT walkeri internationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice
AT williamsn internationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice
AT carlinimassimo internationalmultidisciplinarypeerdrivenconsensusontheoptimaluseofhemostaticpowdersinsurgicalpractice