Cargando…
Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy
BACKGROUND: The impact of positive surgical margins (PSMs) after partial nephrectomy (PN) is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk factors for a PSM and its impact on overall survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective study of 388 patients were submitted to PN betw...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2020.08.006 |
_version_ | 1783730129620434944 |
---|---|
author | Carvalho, João André Mendes Nunes, Pedro Tavares-da-Silva, Edgar Parada, Belmiro Jarimba, Roberto Moreira, Pedro Retroz, Edson Caetano, Rui Sousa, Vítor Cipriano, Augusta Figueiredo, Arnaldo |
author_facet | Carvalho, João André Mendes Nunes, Pedro Tavares-da-Silva, Edgar Parada, Belmiro Jarimba, Roberto Moreira, Pedro Retroz, Edson Caetano, Rui Sousa, Vítor Cipriano, Augusta Figueiredo, Arnaldo |
author_sort | Carvalho, João André Mendes |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The impact of positive surgical margins (PSMs) after partial nephrectomy (PN) is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk factors for a PSM and its impact on overall survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective study of 388 patients were submitted to PN between November 2005 and December 2016 in a single centre. Two groups were created: PSM and negative surgical margin (NSM) after PN. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Relationships with outcome were assessed using univariable and multivariable tests and log-rank analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The PSM rate was 3.8% (N = 16). The mean age at the time of surgery (PSM group: 64.1 ± 11.3 vs NSM group: 61.8 ± 12.8 yr, p = 0.5) and the mean radiological tumour size (4.0 ± 1.5 vs 3.4 ± 1.8 cm, p = 0.2) were similar. Lesion location (p = 0.3), surgical approach (p = 0.4), warm ischaemia time (p = 0.9), and surgery time (p = 0.06) had no association with PSM. However, higher surgeon experience was associated with a lower PSM incidence (2.6% if ≥30 PNs vs 9.6% if <30 PNs; p = 0.02). Higher operative blood loss (p = 0.02), higher-risk tumours (p = 0.03), and larger pathological size (p = 0.05) were associated with an increase in PSM. In the PSM group, recurrence rate (18.7% vs 4.2%, p = 0.007) and secondary total nephrectomy rate (25% vs 4.4%, p < 0.001) were higher. However, overall survival was similar. Multivariate analysis revealed that high-risk tumour (p = 0.05) and low experience (p = 0.03) could predict a PSM. Limitations include retrospective design and reduced follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: PSMs were mainly associated with high-risk pathological tumour (p = 0.05) and low-volume surgeon experience. Recurrence rate and need for total nephrectomy were higher in that group, but no impact on survival was noticed. PATIENT SUMMARY: The impact of positive surgical margins (PSMs) after partial nephrectomy is a matter of debate. In this study, we found that PSMs were mainly associated with aggressive disease and low surgeon experience. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8317835 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83178352021-07-29 Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy Carvalho, João André Mendes Nunes, Pedro Tavares-da-Silva, Edgar Parada, Belmiro Jarimba, Roberto Moreira, Pedro Retroz, Edson Caetano, Rui Sousa, Vítor Cipriano, Augusta Figueiredo, Arnaldo Eur Urol Open Sci Kidney Cancer BACKGROUND: The impact of positive surgical margins (PSMs) after partial nephrectomy (PN) is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk factors for a PSM and its impact on overall survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective study of 388 patients were submitted to PN between November 2005 and December 2016 in a single centre. Two groups were created: PSM and negative surgical margin (NSM) after PN. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Relationships with outcome were assessed using univariable and multivariable tests and log-rank analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The PSM rate was 3.8% (N = 16). The mean age at the time of surgery (PSM group: 64.1 ± 11.3 vs NSM group: 61.8 ± 12.8 yr, p = 0.5) and the mean radiological tumour size (4.0 ± 1.5 vs 3.4 ± 1.8 cm, p = 0.2) were similar. Lesion location (p = 0.3), surgical approach (p = 0.4), warm ischaemia time (p = 0.9), and surgery time (p = 0.06) had no association with PSM. However, higher surgeon experience was associated with a lower PSM incidence (2.6% if ≥30 PNs vs 9.6% if <30 PNs; p = 0.02). Higher operative blood loss (p = 0.02), higher-risk tumours (p = 0.03), and larger pathological size (p = 0.05) were associated with an increase in PSM. In the PSM group, recurrence rate (18.7% vs 4.2%, p = 0.007) and secondary total nephrectomy rate (25% vs 4.4%, p < 0.001) were higher. However, overall survival was similar. Multivariate analysis revealed that high-risk tumour (p = 0.05) and low experience (p = 0.03) could predict a PSM. Limitations include retrospective design and reduced follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: PSMs were mainly associated with high-risk pathological tumour (p = 0.05) and low-volume surgeon experience. Recurrence rate and need for total nephrectomy were higher in that group, but no impact on survival was noticed. PATIENT SUMMARY: The impact of positive surgical margins (PSMs) after partial nephrectomy is a matter of debate. In this study, we found that PSMs were mainly associated with aggressive disease and low surgeon experience. Elsevier 2020-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8317835/ /pubmed/34337467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2020.08.006 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Kidney Cancer Carvalho, João André Mendes Nunes, Pedro Tavares-da-Silva, Edgar Parada, Belmiro Jarimba, Roberto Moreira, Pedro Retroz, Edson Caetano, Rui Sousa, Vítor Cipriano, Augusta Figueiredo, Arnaldo Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy |
title | Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy |
title_full | Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy |
title_fullStr | Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy |
title_short | Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy |
title_sort | impact of positive surgical margins after partial nephrectomy |
topic | Kidney Cancer |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317835/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2020.08.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carvalhojoaoandremendes impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterpartialnephrectomy AT nunespedro impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterpartialnephrectomy AT tavaresdasilvaedgar impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterpartialnephrectomy AT paradabelmiro impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterpartialnephrectomy AT jarimbaroberto impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterpartialnephrectomy AT moreirapedro impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterpartialnephrectomy AT retrozedson impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterpartialnephrectomy AT caetanorui impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterpartialnephrectomy AT sousavitor impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterpartialnephrectomy AT ciprianoaugusta impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterpartialnephrectomy AT figueiredoarnaldo impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterpartialnephrectomy |