Cargando…

Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy

BACKGROUND: The impact of positive surgical margins (PSMs) after partial nephrectomy (PN) is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk factors for a PSM and its impact on overall survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective study of 388 patients were submitted to PN betw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carvalho, João André Mendes, Nunes, Pedro, Tavares-da-Silva, Edgar, Parada, Belmiro, Jarimba, Roberto, Moreira, Pedro, Retroz, Edson, Caetano, Rui, Sousa, Vítor, Cipriano, Augusta, Figueiredo, Arnaldo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2020.08.006
_version_ 1783730129620434944
author Carvalho, João André Mendes
Nunes, Pedro
Tavares-da-Silva, Edgar
Parada, Belmiro
Jarimba, Roberto
Moreira, Pedro
Retroz, Edson
Caetano, Rui
Sousa, Vítor
Cipriano, Augusta
Figueiredo, Arnaldo
author_facet Carvalho, João André Mendes
Nunes, Pedro
Tavares-da-Silva, Edgar
Parada, Belmiro
Jarimba, Roberto
Moreira, Pedro
Retroz, Edson
Caetano, Rui
Sousa, Vítor
Cipriano, Augusta
Figueiredo, Arnaldo
author_sort Carvalho, João André Mendes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The impact of positive surgical margins (PSMs) after partial nephrectomy (PN) is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk factors for a PSM and its impact on overall survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective study of 388 patients were submitted to PN between November 2005 and December 2016 in a single centre. Two groups were created: PSM and negative surgical margin (NSM) after PN. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Relationships with outcome were assessed using univariable and multivariable tests and log-rank analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The PSM rate was 3.8% (N = 16). The mean age at the time of surgery (PSM group: 64.1 ± 11.3 vs NSM group: 61.8 ± 12.8 yr, p =  0.5) and the mean radiological tumour size (4.0 ± 1.5 vs 3.4 ± 1.8 cm, p =  0.2) were similar. Lesion location (p =  0.3), surgical approach (p =  0.4), warm ischaemia time (p =  0.9), and surgery time (p =  0.06) had no association with PSM. However, higher surgeon experience was associated with a lower PSM incidence (2.6% if ≥30 PNs vs 9.6% if <30 PNs; p =  0.02). Higher operative blood loss (p =  0.02), higher-risk tumours (p =  0.03), and larger pathological size (p =  0.05) were associated with an increase in PSM. In the PSM group, recurrence rate (18.7% vs 4.2%, p =  0.007) and secondary total nephrectomy rate (25% vs 4.4%, p <  0.001) were higher. However, overall survival was similar. Multivariate analysis revealed that high-risk tumour (p =  0.05) and low experience (p =  0.03) could predict a PSM. Limitations include retrospective design and reduced follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: PSMs were mainly associated with high-risk pathological tumour (p =  0.05) and low-volume surgeon experience. Recurrence rate and need for total nephrectomy were higher in that group, but no impact on survival was noticed. PATIENT SUMMARY: The impact of positive surgical margins (PSMs) after partial nephrectomy is a matter of debate. In this study, we found that PSMs were mainly associated with aggressive disease and low surgeon experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8317835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83178352021-07-29 Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy Carvalho, João André Mendes Nunes, Pedro Tavares-da-Silva, Edgar Parada, Belmiro Jarimba, Roberto Moreira, Pedro Retroz, Edson Caetano, Rui Sousa, Vítor Cipriano, Augusta Figueiredo, Arnaldo Eur Urol Open Sci Kidney Cancer BACKGROUND: The impact of positive surgical margins (PSMs) after partial nephrectomy (PN) is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk factors for a PSM and its impact on overall survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective study of 388 patients were submitted to PN between November 2005 and December 2016 in a single centre. Two groups were created: PSM and negative surgical margin (NSM) after PN. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Relationships with outcome were assessed using univariable and multivariable tests and log-rank analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The PSM rate was 3.8% (N = 16). The mean age at the time of surgery (PSM group: 64.1 ± 11.3 vs NSM group: 61.8 ± 12.8 yr, p =  0.5) and the mean radiological tumour size (4.0 ± 1.5 vs 3.4 ± 1.8 cm, p =  0.2) were similar. Lesion location (p =  0.3), surgical approach (p =  0.4), warm ischaemia time (p =  0.9), and surgery time (p =  0.06) had no association with PSM. However, higher surgeon experience was associated with a lower PSM incidence (2.6% if ≥30 PNs vs 9.6% if <30 PNs; p =  0.02). Higher operative blood loss (p =  0.02), higher-risk tumours (p =  0.03), and larger pathological size (p =  0.05) were associated with an increase in PSM. In the PSM group, recurrence rate (18.7% vs 4.2%, p =  0.007) and secondary total nephrectomy rate (25% vs 4.4%, p <  0.001) were higher. However, overall survival was similar. Multivariate analysis revealed that high-risk tumour (p =  0.05) and low experience (p =  0.03) could predict a PSM. Limitations include retrospective design and reduced follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: PSMs were mainly associated with high-risk pathological tumour (p =  0.05) and low-volume surgeon experience. Recurrence rate and need for total nephrectomy were higher in that group, but no impact on survival was noticed. PATIENT SUMMARY: The impact of positive surgical margins (PSMs) after partial nephrectomy is a matter of debate. In this study, we found that PSMs were mainly associated with aggressive disease and low surgeon experience. Elsevier 2020-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8317835/ /pubmed/34337467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2020.08.006 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Kidney Cancer
Carvalho, João André Mendes
Nunes, Pedro
Tavares-da-Silva, Edgar
Parada, Belmiro
Jarimba, Roberto
Moreira, Pedro
Retroz, Edson
Caetano, Rui
Sousa, Vítor
Cipriano, Augusta
Figueiredo, Arnaldo
Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy
title Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy
title_full Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy
title_fullStr Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy
title_short Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy
title_sort impact of positive surgical margins after partial nephrectomy
topic Kidney Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2020.08.006
work_keys_str_mv AT carvalhojoaoandremendes impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterpartialnephrectomy
AT nunespedro impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterpartialnephrectomy
AT tavaresdasilvaedgar impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterpartialnephrectomy
AT paradabelmiro impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterpartialnephrectomy
AT jarimbaroberto impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterpartialnephrectomy
AT moreirapedro impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterpartialnephrectomy
AT retrozedson impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterpartialnephrectomy
AT caetanorui impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterpartialnephrectomy
AT sousavitor impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterpartialnephrectomy
AT ciprianoaugusta impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterpartialnephrectomy
AT figueiredoarnaldo impactofpositivesurgicalmarginsafterpartialnephrectomy