Cargando…
Confirmation by Early Oncologic Outcomes After Surgery of the Accuracy of Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer Classification Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging and Targeted Biopsy
Over the past decade, prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis drastically evolved from systematic biopsies (SBs) to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and targeted biopsy (TB), which have emerged as powerful imaging tools for diagnosis, staging, and preoperative planning. MRI and TB should n...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2020.07.003 |
_version_ | 1783730133547352064 |
---|---|
author | Manceau, Cécile Beauval, Jean-Baptiste Lesourd, Marine Almeras, Christophe Gautier, Jean-Romain Soulié, Michel Loison, Guillaume Salin, Ambroise Tollon, Christophe Malavaud, Bernard Roumiguié, Mathieu Ploussard, Guillaume |
author_facet | Manceau, Cécile Beauval, Jean-Baptiste Lesourd, Marine Almeras, Christophe Gautier, Jean-Romain Soulié, Michel Loison, Guillaume Salin, Ambroise Tollon, Christophe Malavaud, Bernard Roumiguié, Mathieu Ploussard, Guillaume |
author_sort | Manceau, Cécile |
collection | PubMed |
description | Over the past decade, prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis drastically evolved from systematic biopsies (SBs) to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and targeted biopsy (TB), which have emerged as powerful imaging tools for diagnosis, staging, and preoperative planning. MRI and TB should now be widely adopted for assessing prognosis and be incorporated into predictive models. To date, the standard intermediate risk classification (IRC) defined unfavourable and favourable disease with clinical information and overall biopsy data. Roumiguie et al have proposed a new model based on mpMRI staging and grade group on TB and validated it using radical prostatectomy (RP) pathology (Urol Oncol 2020;38:386–92). The aim of our study was to validate the accuracy of this new IRC with early oncologic outcomes and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RP. From a prospective database of RP patients with positive prebiopsy mpMRI (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score ≥3) followed by SB in combination with TB, 454 patients with intermediate-risk PCa were included. Median follow-up was 31.5 mo. The new IRC outperformed the standard IRC in predicting BCR (p = 0.007). The area under the curve was 0.613 for the new MRI- and TB-based IRC versus 0.575 for the standard IRC. This new IRC could optimise the prediction of recurrence risk before treatment decision-making. PATIENT SUMMARY: Outcomes after surgery confirm the accuracy of the new classification of intermediate-risk prostate cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) staging and targeted biopsy data. We found that this new classification outperformed the standard classification in predicting biochemical recurrence of cancer for men with positive MRI findings undergoing targeted biopsies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8317854 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83178542021-07-29 Confirmation by Early Oncologic Outcomes After Surgery of the Accuracy of Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer Classification Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging and Targeted Biopsy Manceau, Cécile Beauval, Jean-Baptiste Lesourd, Marine Almeras, Christophe Gautier, Jean-Romain Soulié, Michel Loison, Guillaume Salin, Ambroise Tollon, Christophe Malavaud, Bernard Roumiguié, Mathieu Ploussard, Guillaume Eur Urol Open Sci Brief Correspondence Over the past decade, prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis drastically evolved from systematic biopsies (SBs) to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and targeted biopsy (TB), which have emerged as powerful imaging tools for diagnosis, staging, and preoperative planning. MRI and TB should now be widely adopted for assessing prognosis and be incorporated into predictive models. To date, the standard intermediate risk classification (IRC) defined unfavourable and favourable disease with clinical information and overall biopsy data. Roumiguie et al have proposed a new model based on mpMRI staging and grade group on TB and validated it using radical prostatectomy (RP) pathology (Urol Oncol 2020;38:386–92). The aim of our study was to validate the accuracy of this new IRC with early oncologic outcomes and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RP. From a prospective database of RP patients with positive prebiopsy mpMRI (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score ≥3) followed by SB in combination with TB, 454 patients with intermediate-risk PCa were included. Median follow-up was 31.5 mo. The new IRC outperformed the standard IRC in predicting BCR (p = 0.007). The area under the curve was 0.613 for the new MRI- and TB-based IRC versus 0.575 for the standard IRC. This new IRC could optimise the prediction of recurrence risk before treatment decision-making. PATIENT SUMMARY: Outcomes after surgery confirm the accuracy of the new classification of intermediate-risk prostate cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) staging and targeted biopsy data. We found that this new classification outperformed the standard classification in predicting biochemical recurrence of cancer for men with positive MRI findings undergoing targeted biopsies. Elsevier 2020-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8317854/ /pubmed/34337461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2020.07.003 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Brief Correspondence Manceau, Cécile Beauval, Jean-Baptiste Lesourd, Marine Almeras, Christophe Gautier, Jean-Romain Soulié, Michel Loison, Guillaume Salin, Ambroise Tollon, Christophe Malavaud, Bernard Roumiguié, Mathieu Ploussard, Guillaume Confirmation by Early Oncologic Outcomes After Surgery of the Accuracy of Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer Classification Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging and Targeted Biopsy |
title | Confirmation by Early Oncologic Outcomes After Surgery of the Accuracy of Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer Classification Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging and Targeted Biopsy |
title_full | Confirmation by Early Oncologic Outcomes After Surgery of the Accuracy of Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer Classification Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging and Targeted Biopsy |
title_fullStr | Confirmation by Early Oncologic Outcomes After Surgery of the Accuracy of Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer Classification Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging and Targeted Biopsy |
title_full_unstemmed | Confirmation by Early Oncologic Outcomes After Surgery of the Accuracy of Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer Classification Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging and Targeted Biopsy |
title_short | Confirmation by Early Oncologic Outcomes After Surgery of the Accuracy of Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer Classification Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging and Targeted Biopsy |
title_sort | confirmation by early oncologic outcomes after surgery of the accuracy of intermediate-risk prostate cancer classification based on magnetic resonance imaging staging and targeted biopsy |
topic | Brief Correspondence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317854/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2020.07.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manceaucecile confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy AT beauvaljeanbaptiste confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy AT lesourdmarine confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy AT almeraschristophe confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy AT gautierjeanromain confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy AT souliemichel confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy AT loisonguillaume confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy AT salinambroise confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy AT tollonchristophe confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy AT malavaudbernard confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy AT roumiguiemathieu confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy AT ploussardguillaume confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy |