Cargando…

Confirmation by Early Oncologic Outcomes After Surgery of the Accuracy of Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer Classification Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging and Targeted Biopsy

Over the past decade, prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis drastically evolved from systematic biopsies (SBs) to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and targeted biopsy (TB), which have emerged as powerful imaging tools for diagnosis, staging, and preoperative planning. MRI and TB should n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manceau, Cécile, Beauval, Jean-Baptiste, Lesourd, Marine, Almeras, Christophe, Gautier, Jean-Romain, Soulié, Michel, Loison, Guillaume, Salin, Ambroise, Tollon, Christophe, Malavaud, Bernard, Roumiguié, Mathieu, Ploussard, Guillaume
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2020.07.003
_version_ 1783730133547352064
author Manceau, Cécile
Beauval, Jean-Baptiste
Lesourd, Marine
Almeras, Christophe
Gautier, Jean-Romain
Soulié, Michel
Loison, Guillaume
Salin, Ambroise
Tollon, Christophe
Malavaud, Bernard
Roumiguié, Mathieu
Ploussard, Guillaume
author_facet Manceau, Cécile
Beauval, Jean-Baptiste
Lesourd, Marine
Almeras, Christophe
Gautier, Jean-Romain
Soulié, Michel
Loison, Guillaume
Salin, Ambroise
Tollon, Christophe
Malavaud, Bernard
Roumiguié, Mathieu
Ploussard, Guillaume
author_sort Manceau, Cécile
collection PubMed
description Over the past decade, prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis drastically evolved from systematic biopsies (SBs) to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and targeted biopsy (TB), which have emerged as powerful imaging tools for diagnosis, staging, and preoperative planning. MRI and TB should now be widely adopted for assessing prognosis and be incorporated into predictive models. To date, the standard intermediate risk classification (IRC) defined unfavourable and favourable disease with clinical information and overall biopsy data. Roumiguie et al have proposed a new model based on mpMRI staging and grade group on TB and validated it using radical prostatectomy (RP) pathology (Urol Oncol 2020;38:386–92). The aim of our study was to validate the accuracy of this new IRC with early oncologic outcomes and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RP. From a prospective database of RP patients with positive prebiopsy mpMRI (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score ≥3) followed by SB in combination with TB, 454 patients with intermediate-risk PCa were included. Median follow-up was 31.5 mo. The new IRC outperformed the standard IRC in predicting BCR (p =  0.007). The area under the curve was 0.613 for the new MRI- and TB-based IRC versus 0.575 for the standard IRC. This new IRC could optimise the prediction of recurrence risk before treatment decision-making. PATIENT SUMMARY: Outcomes after surgery confirm the accuracy of the new classification of intermediate-risk prostate cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) staging and targeted biopsy data. We found that this new classification outperformed the standard classification in predicting biochemical recurrence of cancer for men with positive MRI findings undergoing targeted biopsies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8317854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83178542021-07-29 Confirmation by Early Oncologic Outcomes After Surgery of the Accuracy of Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer Classification Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging and Targeted Biopsy Manceau, Cécile Beauval, Jean-Baptiste Lesourd, Marine Almeras, Christophe Gautier, Jean-Romain Soulié, Michel Loison, Guillaume Salin, Ambroise Tollon, Christophe Malavaud, Bernard Roumiguié, Mathieu Ploussard, Guillaume Eur Urol Open Sci Brief Correspondence Over the past decade, prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis drastically evolved from systematic biopsies (SBs) to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and targeted biopsy (TB), which have emerged as powerful imaging tools for diagnosis, staging, and preoperative planning. MRI and TB should now be widely adopted for assessing prognosis and be incorporated into predictive models. To date, the standard intermediate risk classification (IRC) defined unfavourable and favourable disease with clinical information and overall biopsy data. Roumiguie et al have proposed a new model based on mpMRI staging and grade group on TB and validated it using radical prostatectomy (RP) pathology (Urol Oncol 2020;38:386–92). The aim of our study was to validate the accuracy of this new IRC with early oncologic outcomes and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RP. From a prospective database of RP patients with positive prebiopsy mpMRI (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score ≥3) followed by SB in combination with TB, 454 patients with intermediate-risk PCa were included. Median follow-up was 31.5 mo. The new IRC outperformed the standard IRC in predicting BCR (p =  0.007). The area under the curve was 0.613 for the new MRI- and TB-based IRC versus 0.575 for the standard IRC. This new IRC could optimise the prediction of recurrence risk before treatment decision-making. PATIENT SUMMARY: Outcomes after surgery confirm the accuracy of the new classification of intermediate-risk prostate cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) staging and targeted biopsy data. We found that this new classification outperformed the standard classification in predicting biochemical recurrence of cancer for men with positive MRI findings undergoing targeted biopsies. Elsevier 2020-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8317854/ /pubmed/34337461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2020.07.003 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Correspondence
Manceau, Cécile
Beauval, Jean-Baptiste
Lesourd, Marine
Almeras, Christophe
Gautier, Jean-Romain
Soulié, Michel
Loison, Guillaume
Salin, Ambroise
Tollon, Christophe
Malavaud, Bernard
Roumiguié, Mathieu
Ploussard, Guillaume
Confirmation by Early Oncologic Outcomes After Surgery of the Accuracy of Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer Classification Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging and Targeted Biopsy
title Confirmation by Early Oncologic Outcomes After Surgery of the Accuracy of Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer Classification Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging and Targeted Biopsy
title_full Confirmation by Early Oncologic Outcomes After Surgery of the Accuracy of Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer Classification Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging and Targeted Biopsy
title_fullStr Confirmation by Early Oncologic Outcomes After Surgery of the Accuracy of Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer Classification Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging and Targeted Biopsy
title_full_unstemmed Confirmation by Early Oncologic Outcomes After Surgery of the Accuracy of Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer Classification Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging and Targeted Biopsy
title_short Confirmation by Early Oncologic Outcomes After Surgery of the Accuracy of Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer Classification Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging and Targeted Biopsy
title_sort confirmation by early oncologic outcomes after surgery of the accuracy of intermediate-risk prostate cancer classification based on magnetic resonance imaging staging and targeted biopsy
topic Brief Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2020.07.003
work_keys_str_mv AT manceaucecile confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy
AT beauvaljeanbaptiste confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy
AT lesourdmarine confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy
AT almeraschristophe confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy
AT gautierjeanromain confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy
AT souliemichel confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy
AT loisonguillaume confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy
AT salinambroise confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy
AT tollonchristophe confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy
AT malavaudbernard confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy
AT roumiguiemathieu confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy
AT ploussardguillaume confirmationbyearlyoncologicoutcomesaftersurgeryoftheaccuracyofintermediateriskprostatecancerclassificationbasedonmagneticresonanceimagingstagingandtargetedbiopsy