Cargando…

Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 Mutation as a Prognostic Indicator in Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutations have been implicated in urothelial tumorigenesis. FGFR3 inhibitors are being explored in clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to study the association between FGFR3 mutations and survival in urothelial carcinoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khalid, Sidra, Basulaiman, Bassam Mohammed, Emack, Jeffrey, Booth, Christopher M., Duran, Ignacio, Robinson, Andrew G., Berman, David, Smoragiewicz, Martin, Amir, Eitan, Vera-Badillo, Francisco E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2020.08.008
_version_ 1783730144141115392
author Khalid, Sidra
Basulaiman, Bassam Mohammed
Emack, Jeffrey
Booth, Christopher M.
Duran, Ignacio
Robinson, Andrew G.
Berman, David
Smoragiewicz, Martin
Amir, Eitan
Vera-Badillo, Francisco E.
author_facet Khalid, Sidra
Basulaiman, Bassam Mohammed
Emack, Jeffrey
Booth, Christopher M.
Duran, Ignacio
Robinson, Andrew G.
Berman, David
Smoragiewicz, Martin
Amir, Eitan
Vera-Badillo, Francisco E.
author_sort Khalid, Sidra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutations have been implicated in urothelial tumorigenesis. FGFR3 inhibitors are being explored in clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to study the association between FGFR3 mutations and survival in urothelial carcinoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed, Cochrane, Ovid, and Web of Science from January 1985 to October 2018. The search terms were as follows: targeted therapies, FGFR and its subtypes, urothelial, bladder, and cancer. We included case-control or cohort studies of FGFR3 mutations in urothelial carcinoma. We included studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for outcomes comparing FGFR3 mutations with FGFR3 wild type. Two reviewers performed article selection. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We assessed heterogeneity among study-specific HRs using I(2) statistic. We used a random effect model to obtain HR and 95% CI for event-free survival (EFS), composed of recurrence-free and progression-free survival. Statistical tests were two sided. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Eleven studies (seven retrospective and four prospective) comprising 2162 patients were included. Analysis was performed for two groups. The first group included 1651 patients with non–muscle-invasive (NMI) urothelial carcinomas (886 [53.6%] had FGFR3 mutations). Compared with FGFR3 wild type, FGFR3 mutation did not influence EFS (HR = 0.99, CI = 0.77–1.28, p =  0.96). There was no significant heterogeneity (I(2) = 25%). The second group included 511 patients with NMI and muscle-invasive (MI) urothelial carcinomas (151 [30%] had FGFR3 mutations). FGFR3 mutation was not prognostic (HR = 1.54, CI = 0.41–5.81, p =  0.52). There was heterogeneity (I(2) = 91%). CONCLUSIONS: There is no association between FGFR3 mutation and EFS in NMI urothelial carcinoma, and in NMI and MI urothelial carcinoma groups. PATIENT SUMMARY: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutation is not associated with a worse survival outcome in urothelial carcinoma. This is important as FGFR inhibitors are emerging as a new treatment option.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8317902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83179022021-07-29 Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 Mutation as a Prognostic Indicator in Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Khalid, Sidra Basulaiman, Bassam Mohammed Emack, Jeffrey Booth, Christopher M. Duran, Ignacio Robinson, Andrew G. Berman, David Smoragiewicz, Martin Amir, Eitan Vera-Badillo, Francisco E. Eur Urol Open Sci Urothelial Cancer BACKGROUND: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutations have been implicated in urothelial tumorigenesis. FGFR3 inhibitors are being explored in clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to study the association between FGFR3 mutations and survival in urothelial carcinoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed, Cochrane, Ovid, and Web of Science from January 1985 to October 2018. The search terms were as follows: targeted therapies, FGFR and its subtypes, urothelial, bladder, and cancer. We included case-control or cohort studies of FGFR3 mutations in urothelial carcinoma. We included studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for outcomes comparing FGFR3 mutations with FGFR3 wild type. Two reviewers performed article selection. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We assessed heterogeneity among study-specific HRs using I(2) statistic. We used a random effect model to obtain HR and 95% CI for event-free survival (EFS), composed of recurrence-free and progression-free survival. Statistical tests were two sided. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Eleven studies (seven retrospective and four prospective) comprising 2162 patients were included. Analysis was performed for two groups. The first group included 1651 patients with non–muscle-invasive (NMI) urothelial carcinomas (886 [53.6%] had FGFR3 mutations). Compared with FGFR3 wild type, FGFR3 mutation did not influence EFS (HR = 0.99, CI = 0.77–1.28, p =  0.96). There was no significant heterogeneity (I(2) = 25%). The second group included 511 patients with NMI and muscle-invasive (MI) urothelial carcinomas (151 [30%] had FGFR3 mutations). FGFR3 mutation was not prognostic (HR = 1.54, CI = 0.41–5.81, p =  0.52). There was heterogeneity (I(2) = 91%). CONCLUSIONS: There is no association between FGFR3 mutation and EFS in NMI urothelial carcinoma, and in NMI and MI urothelial carcinoma groups. PATIENT SUMMARY: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutation is not associated with a worse survival outcome in urothelial carcinoma. This is important as FGFR inhibitors are emerging as a new treatment option. Elsevier 2020-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8317902/ /pubmed/34337469 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2020.08.008 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Urothelial Cancer
Khalid, Sidra
Basulaiman, Bassam Mohammed
Emack, Jeffrey
Booth, Christopher M.
Duran, Ignacio
Robinson, Andrew G.
Berman, David
Smoragiewicz, Martin
Amir, Eitan
Vera-Badillo, Francisco E.
Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 Mutation as a Prognostic Indicator in Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 Mutation as a Prognostic Indicator in Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 Mutation as a Prognostic Indicator in Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 Mutation as a Prognostic Indicator in Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 Mutation as a Prognostic Indicator in Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 Mutation as a Prognostic Indicator in Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 mutation as a prognostic indicator in patients with urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Urothelial Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34337469
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2020.08.008
work_keys_str_mv AT khalidsidra fibroblastgrowthfactorreceptor3mutationasaprognosticindicatorinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT basulaimanbassammohammed fibroblastgrowthfactorreceptor3mutationasaprognosticindicatorinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT emackjeffrey fibroblastgrowthfactorreceptor3mutationasaprognosticindicatorinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT boothchristopherm fibroblastgrowthfactorreceptor3mutationasaprognosticindicatorinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT duranignacio fibroblastgrowthfactorreceptor3mutationasaprognosticindicatorinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT robinsonandrewg fibroblastgrowthfactorreceptor3mutationasaprognosticindicatorinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bermandavid fibroblastgrowthfactorreceptor3mutationasaprognosticindicatorinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT smoragiewiczmartin fibroblastgrowthfactorreceptor3mutationasaprognosticindicatorinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT amireitan fibroblastgrowthfactorreceptor3mutationasaprognosticindicatorinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT verabadillofranciscoe fibroblastgrowthfactorreceptor3mutationasaprognosticindicatorinpatientswithurothelialcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis