Cargando…

Effects of Three Different Methods Defining Onset of Peripheral Artery Disease on the Assessments of Incidence and Important Predictors – Results from the German Epidemiological Trial on Ankle Brachial Index (getABI)

PURPOSE: The common definition of asymptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) by a single determination of the ankle brachial index (ABI) has some uncertainty due to measurement errors. This may impact estimates of PAD incidence and assessment of PAD risk factors. To investigate this issue, we used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lupilov, Alexander, Krause, Dietmar, Klaassen-Mielke, Renate, Trampisch, Hans J, Rudolf, Henrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335027
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S307675
_version_ 1783730151221100544
author Lupilov, Alexander
Krause, Dietmar
Klaassen-Mielke, Renate
Trampisch, Hans J
Rudolf, Henrik
author_facet Lupilov, Alexander
Krause, Dietmar
Klaassen-Mielke, Renate
Trampisch, Hans J
Rudolf, Henrik
author_sort Lupilov, Alexander
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The common definition of asymptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) by a single determination of the ankle brachial index (ABI) has some uncertainty due to measurement errors. This may impact estimates of PAD incidence and assessment of PAD risk factors. To investigate this issue, we used three methods to define asymptomatic PAD and made use of data from the German Epidemiological Trial on Ankle Brachial Index (getABI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 6,880 unselected subjects aged ≥65 years, enrolled by 344 trained general practitioners, had ABI assessments at baseline and four visits during follow-up. The first approach defined asymptomatic PAD onset as soon as a single ABI value was below 0.9 (single ABI). The second approach employed a regression method using all available ABI values (regression A), while for the third approach (regression B), an extended regression beyond the last valid ABI value for the observation time of the study was allowed. For each approach, we calculated PAD incidence rates and assessed the effect of important PAD predictors using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: The regression method A showed the lowest (25.0 events per 1,000 person years) and the single ABI method the highest incidence rate (41.2). The regression methods assigned greater impact to several risk factors of incident PAD. Using regression A, the hazard ratios (HR) of active smoking (2.36; 95% CI 1.92 to 2.90) and of diabetes (1.33; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.56), using regression B the HR of older age (1.72; 95% CI 1.50 to 1.97) were about twice as high as the corresponding HR of the single ABI approach. CONCLUSION: Use of the single ABI method leads to higher PAD incidence rates and to lower impact of important PAD predictors compared to regression methods. For an alert risk factor management, multiple ABI determination may be useful.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8317934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83179342021-07-30 Effects of Three Different Methods Defining Onset of Peripheral Artery Disease on the Assessments of Incidence and Important Predictors – Results from the German Epidemiological Trial on Ankle Brachial Index (getABI) Lupilov, Alexander Krause, Dietmar Klaassen-Mielke, Renate Trampisch, Hans J Rudolf, Henrik Vasc Health Risk Manag Original Research PURPOSE: The common definition of asymptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) by a single determination of the ankle brachial index (ABI) has some uncertainty due to measurement errors. This may impact estimates of PAD incidence and assessment of PAD risk factors. To investigate this issue, we used three methods to define asymptomatic PAD and made use of data from the German Epidemiological Trial on Ankle Brachial Index (getABI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 6,880 unselected subjects aged ≥65 years, enrolled by 344 trained general practitioners, had ABI assessments at baseline and four visits during follow-up. The first approach defined asymptomatic PAD onset as soon as a single ABI value was below 0.9 (single ABI). The second approach employed a regression method using all available ABI values (regression A), while for the third approach (regression B), an extended regression beyond the last valid ABI value for the observation time of the study was allowed. For each approach, we calculated PAD incidence rates and assessed the effect of important PAD predictors using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: The regression method A showed the lowest (25.0 events per 1,000 person years) and the single ABI method the highest incidence rate (41.2). The regression methods assigned greater impact to several risk factors of incident PAD. Using regression A, the hazard ratios (HR) of active smoking (2.36; 95% CI 1.92 to 2.90) and of diabetes (1.33; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.56), using regression B the HR of older age (1.72; 95% CI 1.50 to 1.97) were about twice as high as the corresponding HR of the single ABI approach. CONCLUSION: Use of the single ABI method leads to higher PAD incidence rates and to lower impact of important PAD predictors compared to regression methods. For an alert risk factor management, multiple ABI determination may be useful. Dove 2021-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8317934/ /pubmed/34335027 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S307675 Text en © 2021 Lupilov et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Lupilov, Alexander
Krause, Dietmar
Klaassen-Mielke, Renate
Trampisch, Hans J
Rudolf, Henrik
Effects of Three Different Methods Defining Onset of Peripheral Artery Disease on the Assessments of Incidence and Important Predictors – Results from the German Epidemiological Trial on Ankle Brachial Index (getABI)
title Effects of Three Different Methods Defining Onset of Peripheral Artery Disease on the Assessments of Incidence and Important Predictors – Results from the German Epidemiological Trial on Ankle Brachial Index (getABI)
title_full Effects of Three Different Methods Defining Onset of Peripheral Artery Disease on the Assessments of Incidence and Important Predictors – Results from the German Epidemiological Trial on Ankle Brachial Index (getABI)
title_fullStr Effects of Three Different Methods Defining Onset of Peripheral Artery Disease on the Assessments of Incidence and Important Predictors – Results from the German Epidemiological Trial on Ankle Brachial Index (getABI)
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Three Different Methods Defining Onset of Peripheral Artery Disease on the Assessments of Incidence and Important Predictors – Results from the German Epidemiological Trial on Ankle Brachial Index (getABI)
title_short Effects of Three Different Methods Defining Onset of Peripheral Artery Disease on the Assessments of Incidence and Important Predictors – Results from the German Epidemiological Trial on Ankle Brachial Index (getABI)
title_sort effects of three different methods defining onset of peripheral artery disease on the assessments of incidence and important predictors – results from the german epidemiological trial on ankle brachial index (getabi)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8317934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335027
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S307675
work_keys_str_mv AT lupilovalexander effectsofthreedifferentmethodsdefiningonsetofperipheralarterydiseaseontheassessmentsofincidenceandimportantpredictorsresultsfromthegermanepidemiologicaltrialonanklebrachialindexgetabi
AT krausedietmar effectsofthreedifferentmethodsdefiningonsetofperipheralarterydiseaseontheassessmentsofincidenceandimportantpredictorsresultsfromthegermanepidemiologicaltrialonanklebrachialindexgetabi
AT klaassenmielkerenate effectsofthreedifferentmethodsdefiningonsetofperipheralarterydiseaseontheassessmentsofincidenceandimportantpredictorsresultsfromthegermanepidemiologicaltrialonanklebrachialindexgetabi
AT trampischhansj effectsofthreedifferentmethodsdefiningonsetofperipheralarterydiseaseontheassessmentsofincidenceandimportantpredictorsresultsfromthegermanepidemiologicaltrialonanklebrachialindexgetabi
AT rudolfhenrik effectsofthreedifferentmethodsdefiningonsetofperipheralarterydiseaseontheassessmentsofincidenceandimportantpredictorsresultsfromthegermanepidemiologicaltrialonanklebrachialindexgetabi