Cargando…
Dental implant quality registries and databases: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: The importance of dental implant quality register has been well-documented. However, no systematic review conducted on dental implant quality register can be found in the literature. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to study the existed dental implant quality registries to explai...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8318161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34395651 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1302_20 |
_version_ | 1783730191971909632 |
---|---|
author | Naemi, Roya Barikani, Hamid Reza Shahmoradi, Leila |
author_facet | Naemi, Roya Barikani, Hamid Reza Shahmoradi, Leila |
author_sort | Naemi, Roya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The importance of dental implant quality register has been well-documented. However, no systematic review conducted on dental implant quality register can be found in the literature. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to study the existed dental implant quality registries to explain the goals, data elements, and reports of dental implant quality registries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic study was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases. For evaluating dental implant quality registers, all studies in the English language were examined with no time limitation. Case reports, conference abstracts, and letters to the editor were excluded. The analysis of the quality of the studies was done by the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology checklist. RESULTS: The primary search identified 5565 articles. After eliminating duplicate articles and articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria and reviewing 40 full texts, 11 studies were included in this study. In this review, seven countries as Sweden, the USA, Canada, Germany, Finland, Australia, and South Korea had dental implant quality registers. Furthermore, the goals of dental implant quality registers were classified into the categories of research, epidemiology, administrative, clinical, and surveillance. CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide dentists and other stakeholders useful information on the existed dental implant quality registers and databases worldwide. It also provides a framework of the goals, data elements, and reports of dental implant quality registry. The establishment of dental implant quality register will be beneficial for societies and also allows them to control the complications of dental implants in future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8318161 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83181612021-08-12 Dental implant quality registries and databases: A systematic review Naemi, Roya Barikani, Hamid Reza Shahmoradi, Leila J Educ Health Promot Original Article BACKGROUND: The importance of dental implant quality register has been well-documented. However, no systematic review conducted on dental implant quality register can be found in the literature. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to study the existed dental implant quality registries to explain the goals, data elements, and reports of dental implant quality registries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic study was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases. For evaluating dental implant quality registers, all studies in the English language were examined with no time limitation. Case reports, conference abstracts, and letters to the editor were excluded. The analysis of the quality of the studies was done by the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology checklist. RESULTS: The primary search identified 5565 articles. After eliminating duplicate articles and articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria and reviewing 40 full texts, 11 studies were included in this study. In this review, seven countries as Sweden, the USA, Canada, Germany, Finland, Australia, and South Korea had dental implant quality registers. Furthermore, the goals of dental implant quality registers were classified into the categories of research, epidemiology, administrative, clinical, and surveillance. CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide dentists and other stakeholders useful information on the existed dental implant quality registers and databases worldwide. It also provides a framework of the goals, data elements, and reports of dental implant quality registry. The establishment of dental implant quality register will be beneficial for societies and also allows them to control the complications of dental implants in future. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8318161/ /pubmed/34395651 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1302_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Education and Health Promotion https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Naemi, Roya Barikani, Hamid Reza Shahmoradi, Leila Dental implant quality registries and databases: A systematic review |
title | Dental implant quality registries and databases: A systematic review |
title_full | Dental implant quality registries and databases: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Dental implant quality registries and databases: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Dental implant quality registries and databases: A systematic review |
title_short | Dental implant quality registries and databases: A systematic review |
title_sort | dental implant quality registries and databases: a systematic review |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8318161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34395651 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1302_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT naemiroya dentalimplantqualityregistriesanddatabasesasystematicreview AT barikanihamidreza dentalimplantqualityregistriesanddatabasesasystematicreview AT shahmoradileila dentalimplantqualityregistriesanddatabasesasystematicreview |