Cargando…

Medication error trends in Middle Eastern countries: A systematic review on healthcare services

Medication errors (MEs) are a critical worldwide concern and can cause genuine clinical ramifications for patients. Studies concerning such errors have not been undertaken as much in the Middle Eastern region. The aim of this study was to systematically review and identify studies done in the Middle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aidah, Saba, Gillani, Syed Wasif, Alderazi, Afifa, Abdulazeez, Fawaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8318177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34395664
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1549_20
_version_ 1783730195777191936
author Aidah, Saba
Gillani, Syed Wasif
Alderazi, Afifa
Abdulazeez, Fawaz
author_facet Aidah, Saba
Gillani, Syed Wasif
Alderazi, Afifa
Abdulazeez, Fawaz
author_sort Aidah, Saba
collection PubMed
description Medication errors (MEs) are a critical worldwide concern and can cause genuine clinical ramifications for patients. Studies concerning such errors have not been undertaken as much in the Middle Eastern region. The aim of this study was to systematically review and identify studies done in the Middle Eastern nations to recognize the principle contributory factors included and to estimate the prevalence in the region. A review of the retrospective, prospective, cohort, and case–control studies based on MEs in the Middle Eastern nations was directed in January 2020 utilizing the accompanying databases: Embase, Medline, PubMed, Ebsco, Cochrane, Scopus, and Prospero. The search methodology incorporated all ages and in English only dating back to 2010. The search methodology included articles about MEs in the Middle East with errors in people of all ages, articles in English, and articles dating back to 2010. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses appraisal instrument was used to assess the quality of the included articles. Individual data extraction, pooled analysis, and the accompanying databases were used for data analysis of the MEs in eligible studies. Fifteen of the 18 articles reviewed from four Middle Eastern countries had low risk of bias, while three out of 18 had medium risk of bias. A total of 58,221 reported people were studied, with a total of 34,730.9 reported MEs. The pooled analysis showed that numbers of errors were mainly prescribing errors (n = 22,715.25), general prescription errors (n = 8097.16), and commission errors (n = 158.2). Iran had the highest rate amid the reported administration errors, at 25.07% (599.11/2388.9). Measuring a patient's clinical laboratory values was another less common type of prescription ME. Lebanon reported to have the highest monitoring errors, with a rate of 13.13% (277.91/2117). A negative trend was shown in the amount of MEs in the vast majority of the nations under the examination. The under-reporting or uncertain information recommended that significan changes are needed in the healthcare sector. There is solid need of literature on healthcare services in the region to completely understand and address the MEs and issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8318177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83181772021-08-12 Medication error trends in Middle Eastern countries: A systematic review on healthcare services Aidah, Saba Gillani, Syed Wasif Alderazi, Afifa Abdulazeez, Fawaz J Educ Health Promot Review Article Medication errors (MEs) are a critical worldwide concern and can cause genuine clinical ramifications for patients. Studies concerning such errors have not been undertaken as much in the Middle Eastern region. The aim of this study was to systematically review and identify studies done in the Middle Eastern nations to recognize the principle contributory factors included and to estimate the prevalence in the region. A review of the retrospective, prospective, cohort, and case–control studies based on MEs in the Middle Eastern nations was directed in January 2020 utilizing the accompanying databases: Embase, Medline, PubMed, Ebsco, Cochrane, Scopus, and Prospero. The search methodology incorporated all ages and in English only dating back to 2010. The search methodology included articles about MEs in the Middle East with errors in people of all ages, articles in English, and articles dating back to 2010. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses appraisal instrument was used to assess the quality of the included articles. Individual data extraction, pooled analysis, and the accompanying databases were used for data analysis of the MEs in eligible studies. Fifteen of the 18 articles reviewed from four Middle Eastern countries had low risk of bias, while three out of 18 had medium risk of bias. A total of 58,221 reported people were studied, with a total of 34,730.9 reported MEs. The pooled analysis showed that numbers of errors were mainly prescribing errors (n = 22,715.25), general prescription errors (n = 8097.16), and commission errors (n = 158.2). Iran had the highest rate amid the reported administration errors, at 25.07% (599.11/2388.9). Measuring a patient's clinical laboratory values was another less common type of prescription ME. Lebanon reported to have the highest monitoring errors, with a rate of 13.13% (277.91/2117). A negative trend was shown in the amount of MEs in the vast majority of the nations under the examination. The under-reporting or uncertain information recommended that significan changes are needed in the healthcare sector. There is solid need of literature on healthcare services in the region to completely understand and address the MEs and issues. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8318177/ /pubmed/34395664 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1549_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Education and Health Promotion https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Aidah, Saba
Gillani, Syed Wasif
Alderazi, Afifa
Abdulazeez, Fawaz
Medication error trends in Middle Eastern countries: A systematic review on healthcare services
title Medication error trends in Middle Eastern countries: A systematic review on healthcare services
title_full Medication error trends in Middle Eastern countries: A systematic review on healthcare services
title_fullStr Medication error trends in Middle Eastern countries: A systematic review on healthcare services
title_full_unstemmed Medication error trends in Middle Eastern countries: A systematic review on healthcare services
title_short Medication error trends in Middle Eastern countries: A systematic review on healthcare services
title_sort medication error trends in middle eastern countries: a systematic review on healthcare services
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8318177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34395664
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1549_20
work_keys_str_mv AT aidahsaba medicationerrortrendsinmiddleeasterncountriesasystematicreviewonhealthcareservices
AT gillanisyedwasif medicationerrortrendsinmiddleeasterncountriesasystematicreviewonhealthcareservices
AT alderaziafifa medicationerrortrendsinmiddleeasterncountriesasystematicreviewonhealthcareservices
AT abdulazeezfawaz medicationerrortrendsinmiddleeasterncountriesasystematicreviewonhealthcareservices