Cargando…

Leveraging a Landscape-Level Monitoring and Assessment Program for Developing Resilient Shorelines throughout the Laurentian Great Lakes

Traditionally, ecosystem monitoring, conservation, and restoration have been conducted in a piecemeal manner at the local scale without regional landscape context. However, scientifically driven conservation and restoration decisions benefit greatly when they are based on regionally determined bench...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uzarski, Donald G., Wilcox, Douglas A., Brady, Valerie J., Cooper, Matthew J., Albert, Dennis A., Ciborowski, Jan J. H., Danz, Nicholas P., Garwood, Anne, Gathman, Joseph P., Gehring, Thomas M., Grabas, Greg P., Howe, Robert W., Johnson, Lucinda B., Lamberti, Gary A., Moerke, Ashley H., Niemi, Gerald J., Redder, Todd, Ruetz, Carl R., Steinman, Alan D., Tozer, Douglas C., O’Donnell, T. Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8318185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34326565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13157-019-01139-w
_version_ 1783730197424504832
author Uzarski, Donald G.
Wilcox, Douglas A.
Brady, Valerie J.
Cooper, Matthew J.
Albert, Dennis A.
Ciborowski, Jan J. H.
Danz, Nicholas P.
Garwood, Anne
Gathman, Joseph P.
Gehring, Thomas M.
Grabas, Greg P.
Howe, Robert W.
Johnson, Lucinda B.
Lamberti, Gary A.
Moerke, Ashley H.
Niemi, Gerald J.
Redder, Todd
Ruetz, Carl R.
Steinman, Alan D.
Tozer, Douglas C.
O’Donnell, T. Kevin
author_facet Uzarski, Donald G.
Wilcox, Douglas A.
Brady, Valerie J.
Cooper, Matthew J.
Albert, Dennis A.
Ciborowski, Jan J. H.
Danz, Nicholas P.
Garwood, Anne
Gathman, Joseph P.
Gehring, Thomas M.
Grabas, Greg P.
Howe, Robert W.
Johnson, Lucinda B.
Lamberti, Gary A.
Moerke, Ashley H.
Niemi, Gerald J.
Redder, Todd
Ruetz, Carl R.
Steinman, Alan D.
Tozer, Douglas C.
O’Donnell, T. Kevin
author_sort Uzarski, Donald G.
collection PubMed
description Traditionally, ecosystem monitoring, conservation, and restoration have been conducted in a piecemeal manner at the local scale without regional landscape context. However, scientifically driven conservation and restoration decisions benefit greatly when they are based on regionally determined benchmarks and goals. Unfortunately, required data sets rarely exist for regionally important ecosystems. Because of early recognition of the extreme ecological importance of Laurentian Great Lakes coastal wetlands, and the extensive degradation that had already occurred, significant investments in coastal wetland research, protection, and restoration have been made in recent decades and continue today. Continued and refined assessment of wetland condition and trends, and the evaluation of restoration practices are all essential to ensuring the success of these investments. To provide wetland managers and decision makers throughout the Laurentian Great Lakes basin with the optimal tools and data needed to make scientifically-based decisions, our regional team of Great Lakes wetland scientists developed standardized methods and indicators used for assessing wetland condition. From a landscape perspective, at the Laurentian Great Lakes ecosystem scale, we established a stratified random-site-selection process to monitor birds, anurans, fish, macroinvertebrates, vegetation, and physicochemical conditions of coastal wetlands in the US and Canada. Monitoring of approximately 200 wetlands per year began in 2011 as the Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Monitoring Program. In this paper, we describe the development, delivery, and expected results of this ongoing international, multi-disciplinary, multi-stakeholder, landscape-scale monitoring program as a case example of successful application of landscape conservation design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8318185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83181852021-07-28 Leveraging a Landscape-Level Monitoring and Assessment Program for Developing Resilient Shorelines throughout the Laurentian Great Lakes Uzarski, Donald G. Wilcox, Douglas A. Brady, Valerie J. Cooper, Matthew J. Albert, Dennis A. Ciborowski, Jan J. H. Danz, Nicholas P. Garwood, Anne Gathman, Joseph P. Gehring, Thomas M. Grabas, Greg P. Howe, Robert W. Johnson, Lucinda B. Lamberti, Gary A. Moerke, Ashley H. Niemi, Gerald J. Redder, Todd Ruetz, Carl R. Steinman, Alan D. Tozer, Douglas C. O’Donnell, T. Kevin Wetlands (Wilmington) Article Traditionally, ecosystem monitoring, conservation, and restoration have been conducted in a piecemeal manner at the local scale without regional landscape context. However, scientifically driven conservation and restoration decisions benefit greatly when they are based on regionally determined benchmarks and goals. Unfortunately, required data sets rarely exist for regionally important ecosystems. Because of early recognition of the extreme ecological importance of Laurentian Great Lakes coastal wetlands, and the extensive degradation that had already occurred, significant investments in coastal wetland research, protection, and restoration have been made in recent decades and continue today. Continued and refined assessment of wetland condition and trends, and the evaluation of restoration practices are all essential to ensuring the success of these investments. To provide wetland managers and decision makers throughout the Laurentian Great Lakes basin with the optimal tools and data needed to make scientifically-based decisions, our regional team of Great Lakes wetland scientists developed standardized methods and indicators used for assessing wetland condition. From a landscape perspective, at the Laurentian Great Lakes ecosystem scale, we established a stratified random-site-selection process to monitor birds, anurans, fish, macroinvertebrates, vegetation, and physicochemical conditions of coastal wetlands in the US and Canada. Monitoring of approximately 200 wetlands per year began in 2011 as the Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Monitoring Program. In this paper, we describe the development, delivery, and expected results of this ongoing international, multi-disciplinary, multi-stakeholder, landscape-scale monitoring program as a case example of successful application of landscape conservation design. 2019-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8318185/ /pubmed/34326565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13157-019-01139-w Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Uzarski, Donald G.
Wilcox, Douglas A.
Brady, Valerie J.
Cooper, Matthew J.
Albert, Dennis A.
Ciborowski, Jan J. H.
Danz, Nicholas P.
Garwood, Anne
Gathman, Joseph P.
Gehring, Thomas M.
Grabas, Greg P.
Howe, Robert W.
Johnson, Lucinda B.
Lamberti, Gary A.
Moerke, Ashley H.
Niemi, Gerald J.
Redder, Todd
Ruetz, Carl R.
Steinman, Alan D.
Tozer, Douglas C.
O’Donnell, T. Kevin
Leveraging a Landscape-Level Monitoring and Assessment Program for Developing Resilient Shorelines throughout the Laurentian Great Lakes
title Leveraging a Landscape-Level Monitoring and Assessment Program for Developing Resilient Shorelines throughout the Laurentian Great Lakes
title_full Leveraging a Landscape-Level Monitoring and Assessment Program for Developing Resilient Shorelines throughout the Laurentian Great Lakes
title_fullStr Leveraging a Landscape-Level Monitoring and Assessment Program for Developing Resilient Shorelines throughout the Laurentian Great Lakes
title_full_unstemmed Leveraging a Landscape-Level Monitoring and Assessment Program for Developing Resilient Shorelines throughout the Laurentian Great Lakes
title_short Leveraging a Landscape-Level Monitoring and Assessment Program for Developing Resilient Shorelines throughout the Laurentian Great Lakes
title_sort leveraging a landscape-level monitoring and assessment program for developing resilient shorelines throughout the laurentian great lakes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8318185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34326565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13157-019-01139-w
work_keys_str_mv AT uzarskidonaldg leveragingalandscapelevelmonitoringandassessmentprogramfordevelopingresilientshorelinesthroughoutthelaurentiangreatlakes
AT wilcoxdouglasa leveragingalandscapelevelmonitoringandassessmentprogramfordevelopingresilientshorelinesthroughoutthelaurentiangreatlakes
AT bradyvaleriej leveragingalandscapelevelmonitoringandassessmentprogramfordevelopingresilientshorelinesthroughoutthelaurentiangreatlakes
AT coopermatthewj leveragingalandscapelevelmonitoringandassessmentprogramfordevelopingresilientshorelinesthroughoutthelaurentiangreatlakes
AT albertdennisa leveragingalandscapelevelmonitoringandassessmentprogramfordevelopingresilientshorelinesthroughoutthelaurentiangreatlakes
AT ciborowskijanjh leveragingalandscapelevelmonitoringandassessmentprogramfordevelopingresilientshorelinesthroughoutthelaurentiangreatlakes
AT danznicholasp leveragingalandscapelevelmonitoringandassessmentprogramfordevelopingresilientshorelinesthroughoutthelaurentiangreatlakes
AT garwoodanne leveragingalandscapelevelmonitoringandassessmentprogramfordevelopingresilientshorelinesthroughoutthelaurentiangreatlakes
AT gathmanjosephp leveragingalandscapelevelmonitoringandassessmentprogramfordevelopingresilientshorelinesthroughoutthelaurentiangreatlakes
AT gehringthomasm leveragingalandscapelevelmonitoringandassessmentprogramfordevelopingresilientshorelinesthroughoutthelaurentiangreatlakes
AT grabasgregp leveragingalandscapelevelmonitoringandassessmentprogramfordevelopingresilientshorelinesthroughoutthelaurentiangreatlakes
AT howerobertw leveragingalandscapelevelmonitoringandassessmentprogramfordevelopingresilientshorelinesthroughoutthelaurentiangreatlakes
AT johnsonlucindab leveragingalandscapelevelmonitoringandassessmentprogramfordevelopingresilientshorelinesthroughoutthelaurentiangreatlakes
AT lambertigarya leveragingalandscapelevelmonitoringandassessmentprogramfordevelopingresilientshorelinesthroughoutthelaurentiangreatlakes
AT moerkeashleyh leveragingalandscapelevelmonitoringandassessmentprogramfordevelopingresilientshorelinesthroughoutthelaurentiangreatlakes
AT niemigeraldj leveragingalandscapelevelmonitoringandassessmentprogramfordevelopingresilientshorelinesthroughoutthelaurentiangreatlakes
AT reddertodd leveragingalandscapelevelmonitoringandassessmentprogramfordevelopingresilientshorelinesthroughoutthelaurentiangreatlakes
AT ruetzcarlr leveragingalandscapelevelmonitoringandassessmentprogramfordevelopingresilientshorelinesthroughoutthelaurentiangreatlakes
AT steinmanaland leveragingalandscapelevelmonitoringandassessmentprogramfordevelopingresilientshorelinesthroughoutthelaurentiangreatlakes
AT tozerdouglasc leveragingalandscapelevelmonitoringandassessmentprogramfordevelopingresilientshorelinesthroughoutthelaurentiangreatlakes
AT odonnelltkevin leveragingalandscapelevelmonitoringandassessmentprogramfordevelopingresilientshorelinesthroughoutthelaurentiangreatlakes