Cargando…

Mind wandering at encoding, but not at retrieval, disrupts one-shot stimulus-control learning

The one-shot pairing of a stimulus with a specific cognitive control process, such as task switching, can bind the two together in memory. The episodic control-binding hypothesis posits that the formation of temporary stimulus-control bindings, which are held in event-files supported by episodic mem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whitehead, Peter S., Mahmoud, Younis, Seli, Paul, Egner, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8318327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322789
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02343-9
_version_ 1783730223884271616
author Whitehead, Peter S.
Mahmoud, Younis
Seli, Paul
Egner, Tobias
author_facet Whitehead, Peter S.
Mahmoud, Younis
Seli, Paul
Egner, Tobias
author_sort Whitehead, Peter S.
collection PubMed
description The one-shot pairing of a stimulus with a specific cognitive control process, such as task switching, can bind the two together in memory. The episodic control-binding hypothesis posits that the formation of temporary stimulus-control bindings, which are held in event-files supported by episodic memory, can guide the contextually appropriate application of cognitive control. Across two experiments, we sought to examine the role of task-focused attention in the encoding and implementation of stimulus-control bindings in episodic event-files. In Experiment 1, we obtained self-reports of mind wandering during encoding and implementation of stimulus-control bindings. Results indicated that, whereas mind wandering during the implementation of stimulus-control bindings does not decrease their efficacy, mind wandering during the encoding of these control-state associations interferes with their successful deployment at a later point. In Experiment 2, we complemented these results by using trial-by-trial pupillometry to measure attention, again demonstrating that attention levels at encoding predict the subsequent implementation of stimulus-control bindings better than attention levels at implementation. These results suggest that, although encoding stimulus-control bindings in episodic memory requires active attention and engagement, once encoded, these bindings are automatically deployed to guide behavior when the stimulus recurs. These findings expand our understanding of how cognitive control processes are integrated into episodic event files. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13414-021-02343-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8318327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83183272021-07-29 Mind wandering at encoding, but not at retrieval, disrupts one-shot stimulus-control learning Whitehead, Peter S. Mahmoud, Younis Seli, Paul Egner, Tobias Atten Percept Psychophys Article The one-shot pairing of a stimulus with a specific cognitive control process, such as task switching, can bind the two together in memory. The episodic control-binding hypothesis posits that the formation of temporary stimulus-control bindings, which are held in event-files supported by episodic memory, can guide the contextually appropriate application of cognitive control. Across two experiments, we sought to examine the role of task-focused attention in the encoding and implementation of stimulus-control bindings in episodic event-files. In Experiment 1, we obtained self-reports of mind wandering during encoding and implementation of stimulus-control bindings. Results indicated that, whereas mind wandering during the implementation of stimulus-control bindings does not decrease their efficacy, mind wandering during the encoding of these control-state associations interferes with their successful deployment at a later point. In Experiment 2, we complemented these results by using trial-by-trial pupillometry to measure attention, again demonstrating that attention levels at encoding predict the subsequent implementation of stimulus-control bindings better than attention levels at implementation. These results suggest that, although encoding stimulus-control bindings in episodic memory requires active attention and engagement, once encoded, these bindings are automatically deployed to guide behavior when the stimulus recurs. These findings expand our understanding of how cognitive control processes are integrated into episodic event files. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13414-021-02343-9. Springer US 2021-07-28 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8318327/ /pubmed/34322789 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02343-9 Text en © The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Whitehead, Peter S.
Mahmoud, Younis
Seli, Paul
Egner, Tobias
Mind wandering at encoding, but not at retrieval, disrupts one-shot stimulus-control learning
title Mind wandering at encoding, but not at retrieval, disrupts one-shot stimulus-control learning
title_full Mind wandering at encoding, but not at retrieval, disrupts one-shot stimulus-control learning
title_fullStr Mind wandering at encoding, but not at retrieval, disrupts one-shot stimulus-control learning
title_full_unstemmed Mind wandering at encoding, but not at retrieval, disrupts one-shot stimulus-control learning
title_short Mind wandering at encoding, but not at retrieval, disrupts one-shot stimulus-control learning
title_sort mind wandering at encoding, but not at retrieval, disrupts one-shot stimulus-control learning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8318327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322789
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-021-02343-9
work_keys_str_mv AT whiteheadpeters mindwanderingatencodingbutnotatretrievaldisruptsoneshotstimuluscontrollearning
AT mahmoudyounis mindwanderingatencodingbutnotatretrievaldisruptsoneshotstimuluscontrollearning
AT selipaul mindwanderingatencodingbutnotatretrievaldisruptsoneshotstimuluscontrollearning
AT egnertobias mindwanderingatencodingbutnotatretrievaldisruptsoneshotstimuluscontrollearning