Cargando…

Clinical phenogroups are more effective than left ventricular ejection fraction categories in stratifying heart failure outcomes

AIMS: Heart failure (HF) guidelines place patients into 3 discrete groups according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): reduced (<40%), mid‐range (40–49%), and preserved LVEF (≥50%). We assessed whether clinical phenogroups offer better prognostication than LVEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gevaert, Andreas B., Tibebu, Semra, Mamas, Mamas A., Ravindra, Neal G., Lee, Shun Fu, Ahmad, Tariq, Ko, Dennis T., Januzzi, James L., Van Spall, Harriette G.C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8318507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33934542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13344
_version_ 1783730260568702976
author Gevaert, Andreas B.
Tibebu, Semra
Mamas, Mamas A.
Ravindra, Neal G.
Lee, Shun Fu
Ahmad, Tariq
Ko, Dennis T.
Januzzi, James L.
Van Spall, Harriette G.C.
author_facet Gevaert, Andreas B.
Tibebu, Semra
Mamas, Mamas A.
Ravindra, Neal G.
Lee, Shun Fu
Ahmad, Tariq
Ko, Dennis T.
Januzzi, James L.
Van Spall, Harriette G.C.
author_sort Gevaert, Andreas B.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Heart failure (HF) guidelines place patients into 3 discrete groups according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): reduced (<40%), mid‐range (40–49%), and preserved LVEF (≥50%). We assessed whether clinical phenogroups offer better prognostication than LVEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a sub‐study of the Patient‐Centered Care Transitions in HF trial. We analysed baseline characteristics of hospitalized patients in whom LVEF was recorded. We used unsupervised machine learning to identify clinical phenogroups and, thereafter, determined associations between phenogroups and outcomes. Primary outcome was the composite of all‐cause death or rehospitalization at 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcome was the composite cardiovascular death or HF rehospitalization at 6 and 12 months. Cluster analysis of 1693 patients revealed six discrete phenogroups, each characterized by a predominant comorbidity: coronary heart disease, valvular heart disease, atrial fibrillation (AF), sleep apnoea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or few comorbidities. Phenogroups were LVEF independent, with each phenogroup encompassing a wide range of LVEFs. For the primary composite outcome at 6 months, the hazard ratios (HRs) for phenogroups ranged from 1.25 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00–1.58 for AF] to 2.04 (95% CI 1.62–2.57 for COPD) (log‐rank P < 0.001); and at 12 months, the HRs for phenogroups ranged from 1.15 (95% CI 0.94–1.41 for AF) to 1.87 (95% 1.52–3.20 for COPD) (P < 0.002). LVEF‐based classifications did not separate patients into different risk categories for the primary outcomes at 6 months (P = 0.69) and 12 months (P = 0.30). Phenogroups also stratified risk of the secondary composite outcome at 6 and 12 months more effectively than LVEF. CONCLUSION: Among patients hospitalized for HF, clinical phenotypes generated by unsupervised machine learning provided greater prognostic information for a composite of clinical endpoints at 6 and 12 months compared with LVEF‐based categories. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02112227
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8318507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83185072021-07-31 Clinical phenogroups are more effective than left ventricular ejection fraction categories in stratifying heart failure outcomes Gevaert, Andreas B. Tibebu, Semra Mamas, Mamas A. Ravindra, Neal G. Lee, Shun Fu Ahmad, Tariq Ko, Dennis T. Januzzi, James L. Van Spall, Harriette G.C. ESC Heart Fail Original Research Articles AIMS: Heart failure (HF) guidelines place patients into 3 discrete groups according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): reduced (<40%), mid‐range (40–49%), and preserved LVEF (≥50%). We assessed whether clinical phenogroups offer better prognostication than LVEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a sub‐study of the Patient‐Centered Care Transitions in HF trial. We analysed baseline characteristics of hospitalized patients in whom LVEF was recorded. We used unsupervised machine learning to identify clinical phenogroups and, thereafter, determined associations between phenogroups and outcomes. Primary outcome was the composite of all‐cause death or rehospitalization at 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcome was the composite cardiovascular death or HF rehospitalization at 6 and 12 months. Cluster analysis of 1693 patients revealed six discrete phenogroups, each characterized by a predominant comorbidity: coronary heart disease, valvular heart disease, atrial fibrillation (AF), sleep apnoea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or few comorbidities. Phenogroups were LVEF independent, with each phenogroup encompassing a wide range of LVEFs. For the primary composite outcome at 6 months, the hazard ratios (HRs) for phenogroups ranged from 1.25 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00–1.58 for AF] to 2.04 (95% CI 1.62–2.57 for COPD) (log‐rank P < 0.001); and at 12 months, the HRs for phenogroups ranged from 1.15 (95% CI 0.94–1.41 for AF) to 1.87 (95% 1.52–3.20 for COPD) (P < 0.002). LVEF‐based classifications did not separate patients into different risk categories for the primary outcomes at 6 months (P = 0.69) and 12 months (P = 0.30). Phenogroups also stratified risk of the secondary composite outcome at 6 and 12 months more effectively than LVEF. CONCLUSION: Among patients hospitalized for HF, clinical phenotypes generated by unsupervised machine learning provided greater prognostic information for a composite of clinical endpoints at 6 and 12 months compared with LVEF‐based categories. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02112227 John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8318507/ /pubmed/33934542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13344 Text en © 2021 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Gevaert, Andreas B.
Tibebu, Semra
Mamas, Mamas A.
Ravindra, Neal G.
Lee, Shun Fu
Ahmad, Tariq
Ko, Dennis T.
Januzzi, James L.
Van Spall, Harriette G.C.
Clinical phenogroups are more effective than left ventricular ejection fraction categories in stratifying heart failure outcomes
title Clinical phenogroups are more effective than left ventricular ejection fraction categories in stratifying heart failure outcomes
title_full Clinical phenogroups are more effective than left ventricular ejection fraction categories in stratifying heart failure outcomes
title_fullStr Clinical phenogroups are more effective than left ventricular ejection fraction categories in stratifying heart failure outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Clinical phenogroups are more effective than left ventricular ejection fraction categories in stratifying heart failure outcomes
title_short Clinical phenogroups are more effective than left ventricular ejection fraction categories in stratifying heart failure outcomes
title_sort clinical phenogroups are more effective than left ventricular ejection fraction categories in stratifying heart failure outcomes
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8318507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33934542
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13344
work_keys_str_mv AT gevaertandreasb clinicalphenogroupsaremoreeffectivethanleftventricularejectionfractioncategoriesinstratifyingheartfailureoutcomes
AT tibebusemra clinicalphenogroupsaremoreeffectivethanleftventricularejectionfractioncategoriesinstratifyingheartfailureoutcomes
AT mamasmamasa clinicalphenogroupsaremoreeffectivethanleftventricularejectionfractioncategoriesinstratifyingheartfailureoutcomes
AT ravindranealg clinicalphenogroupsaremoreeffectivethanleftventricularejectionfractioncategoriesinstratifyingheartfailureoutcomes
AT leeshunfu clinicalphenogroupsaremoreeffectivethanleftventricularejectionfractioncategoriesinstratifyingheartfailureoutcomes
AT ahmadtariq clinicalphenogroupsaremoreeffectivethanleftventricularejectionfractioncategoriesinstratifyingheartfailureoutcomes
AT kodennist clinicalphenogroupsaremoreeffectivethanleftventricularejectionfractioncategoriesinstratifyingheartfailureoutcomes
AT januzzijamesl clinicalphenogroupsaremoreeffectivethanleftventricularejectionfractioncategoriesinstratifyingheartfailureoutcomes
AT vanspallharriettegc clinicalphenogroupsaremoreeffectivethanleftventricularejectionfractioncategoriesinstratifyingheartfailureoutcomes