Cargando…
Prognosis and outcome determinants after heart failure diagnosis in patients who underwent aortic valvular intervention
AIMS: To study clinical phenotype, prognosis for all‐cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality and predictive factors in patients with incident heart failure (HF) after aortic valvular intervention (AVI) for aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective, observational study we inclu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8318512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34057321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13451 |
_version_ | 1783730261784002560 |
---|---|
author | Kontogeorgos, Silvana Thunström, Erik Pivodic, Aldina Dahlström, Ulf Fu, Michael |
author_facet | Kontogeorgos, Silvana Thunström, Erik Pivodic, Aldina Dahlström, Ulf Fu, Michael |
author_sort | Kontogeorgos, Silvana |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To study clinical phenotype, prognosis for all‐cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality and predictive factors in patients with incident heart failure (HF) after aortic valvular intervention (AVI) for aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective, observational study we included patients from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF) recorded 2003–2016, with AS diagnosis and AVI before HF diagnosis. The AS diagnosis was established according to International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD‐10) codes, thus without information concerning clinical or echocardiographical data on the aortic valve disease. The patients were divided into two subgroups: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% (AS‐HFpEF) and <50% (AS‐HFrEF). We individually matched three controls with HF from the SwedeHF without AS (control group) for each patient. Baseline characteristics, co‐morbidities, survival status and outcomes were obtained by linking the SwedeHF with two other Swedish registries. We used Kaplan–Meier curves to present time to all‐cause mortality, cumulative incidence function for time to CV mortality and Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate the relative difference between AS‐HFrEF and AS‐HFpEF and AS‐HF and controls. The crude all‐cause mortality was 49.0%, CV mortality 27.9% in AS‐HF patients, respectively 44.7% and 26.6% in matched controls. The adjusted risk for all‐cause mortality and CV mortality was similar in HF, regardless of LVEF vs. controls. No significant difference in factors predicting higher all‐cause mortality was observed in AS‐HFrEF vs. AS‐HFpEF, except for diabetes (only in AS‐HFrEF), with statistically significant interaction predicting death between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide SwedeHF study, we characterized incident HF population after AVI. We found no significant differences in all‐cause and CV mortality compared with general HF population. They had virtually the same predictors for mortality, regardless of LVEF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8318512 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83185122021-07-31 Prognosis and outcome determinants after heart failure diagnosis in patients who underwent aortic valvular intervention Kontogeorgos, Silvana Thunström, Erik Pivodic, Aldina Dahlström, Ulf Fu, Michael ESC Heart Fail Original Research Articles AIMS: To study clinical phenotype, prognosis for all‐cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality and predictive factors in patients with incident heart failure (HF) after aortic valvular intervention (AVI) for aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective, observational study we included patients from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF) recorded 2003–2016, with AS diagnosis and AVI before HF diagnosis. The AS diagnosis was established according to International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD‐10) codes, thus without information concerning clinical or echocardiographical data on the aortic valve disease. The patients were divided into two subgroups: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% (AS‐HFpEF) and <50% (AS‐HFrEF). We individually matched three controls with HF from the SwedeHF without AS (control group) for each patient. Baseline characteristics, co‐morbidities, survival status and outcomes were obtained by linking the SwedeHF with two other Swedish registries. We used Kaplan–Meier curves to present time to all‐cause mortality, cumulative incidence function for time to CV mortality and Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate the relative difference between AS‐HFrEF and AS‐HFpEF and AS‐HF and controls. The crude all‐cause mortality was 49.0%, CV mortality 27.9% in AS‐HF patients, respectively 44.7% and 26.6% in matched controls. The adjusted risk for all‐cause mortality and CV mortality was similar in HF, regardless of LVEF vs. controls. No significant difference in factors predicting higher all‐cause mortality was observed in AS‐HFrEF vs. AS‐HFpEF, except for diabetes (only in AS‐HFrEF), with statistically significant interaction predicting death between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide SwedeHF study, we characterized incident HF population after AVI. We found no significant differences in all‐cause and CV mortality compared with general HF population. They had virtually the same predictors for mortality, regardless of LVEF. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8318512/ /pubmed/34057321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13451 Text en © 2021 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Kontogeorgos, Silvana Thunström, Erik Pivodic, Aldina Dahlström, Ulf Fu, Michael Prognosis and outcome determinants after heart failure diagnosis in patients who underwent aortic valvular intervention |
title | Prognosis and outcome determinants after heart failure diagnosis in patients who underwent aortic valvular intervention |
title_full | Prognosis and outcome determinants after heart failure diagnosis in patients who underwent aortic valvular intervention |
title_fullStr | Prognosis and outcome determinants after heart failure diagnosis in patients who underwent aortic valvular intervention |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognosis and outcome determinants after heart failure diagnosis in patients who underwent aortic valvular intervention |
title_short | Prognosis and outcome determinants after heart failure diagnosis in patients who underwent aortic valvular intervention |
title_sort | prognosis and outcome determinants after heart failure diagnosis in patients who underwent aortic valvular intervention |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8318512/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34057321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13451 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kontogeorgossilvana prognosisandoutcomedeterminantsafterheartfailurediagnosisinpatientswhounderwentaorticvalvularintervention AT thunstromerik prognosisandoutcomedeterminantsafterheartfailurediagnosisinpatientswhounderwentaorticvalvularintervention AT pivodicaldina prognosisandoutcomedeterminantsafterheartfailurediagnosisinpatientswhounderwentaorticvalvularintervention AT dahlstromulf prognosisandoutcomedeterminantsafterheartfailurediagnosisinpatientswhounderwentaorticvalvularintervention AT fumichael prognosisandoutcomedeterminantsafterheartfailurediagnosisinpatientswhounderwentaorticvalvularintervention |