Cargando…

Prognosis and outcome determinants after heart failure diagnosis in patients who underwent aortic valvular intervention

AIMS: To study clinical phenotype, prognosis for all‐cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality and predictive factors in patients with incident heart failure (HF) after aortic valvular intervention (AVI) for aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective, observational study we inclu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kontogeorgos, Silvana, Thunström, Erik, Pivodic, Aldina, Dahlström, Ulf, Fu, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8318512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34057321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13451
_version_ 1783730261784002560
author Kontogeorgos, Silvana
Thunström, Erik
Pivodic, Aldina
Dahlström, Ulf
Fu, Michael
author_facet Kontogeorgos, Silvana
Thunström, Erik
Pivodic, Aldina
Dahlström, Ulf
Fu, Michael
author_sort Kontogeorgos, Silvana
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To study clinical phenotype, prognosis for all‐cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality and predictive factors in patients with incident heart failure (HF) after aortic valvular intervention (AVI) for aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective, observational study we included patients from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF) recorded 2003–2016, with AS diagnosis and AVI before HF diagnosis. The AS diagnosis was established according to International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD‐10) codes, thus without information concerning clinical or echocardiographical data on the aortic valve disease. The patients were divided into two subgroups: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% (AS‐HFpEF) and <50% (AS‐HFrEF). We individually matched three controls with HF from the SwedeHF without AS (control group) for each patient. Baseline characteristics, co‐morbidities, survival status and outcomes were obtained by linking the SwedeHF with two other Swedish registries. We used Kaplan–Meier curves to present time to all‐cause mortality, cumulative incidence function for time to CV mortality and Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate the relative difference between AS‐HFrEF and AS‐HFpEF and AS‐HF and controls. The crude all‐cause mortality was 49.0%, CV mortality 27.9% in AS‐HF patients, respectively 44.7% and 26.6% in matched controls. The adjusted risk for all‐cause mortality and CV mortality was similar in HF, regardless of LVEF vs. controls. No significant difference in factors predicting higher all‐cause mortality was observed in AS‐HFrEF vs. AS‐HFpEF, except for diabetes (only in AS‐HFrEF), with statistically significant interaction predicting death between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide SwedeHF study, we characterized incident HF population after AVI. We found no significant differences in all‐cause and CV mortality compared with general HF population. They had virtually the same predictors for mortality, regardless of LVEF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8318512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83185122021-07-31 Prognosis and outcome determinants after heart failure diagnosis in patients who underwent aortic valvular intervention Kontogeorgos, Silvana Thunström, Erik Pivodic, Aldina Dahlström, Ulf Fu, Michael ESC Heart Fail Original Research Articles AIMS: To study clinical phenotype, prognosis for all‐cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality and predictive factors in patients with incident heart failure (HF) after aortic valvular intervention (AVI) for aortic stenosis (AS). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective, observational study we included patients from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF) recorded 2003–2016, with AS diagnosis and AVI before HF diagnosis. The AS diagnosis was established according to International Classification of Diseases 10th revision (ICD‐10) codes, thus without information concerning clinical or echocardiographical data on the aortic valve disease. The patients were divided into two subgroups: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% (AS‐HFpEF) and <50% (AS‐HFrEF). We individually matched three controls with HF from the SwedeHF without AS (control group) for each patient. Baseline characteristics, co‐morbidities, survival status and outcomes were obtained by linking the SwedeHF with two other Swedish registries. We used Kaplan–Meier curves to present time to all‐cause mortality, cumulative incidence function for time to CV mortality and Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate the relative difference between AS‐HFrEF and AS‐HFpEF and AS‐HF and controls. The crude all‐cause mortality was 49.0%, CV mortality 27.9% in AS‐HF patients, respectively 44.7% and 26.6% in matched controls. The adjusted risk for all‐cause mortality and CV mortality was similar in HF, regardless of LVEF vs. controls. No significant difference in factors predicting higher all‐cause mortality was observed in AS‐HFrEF vs. AS‐HFpEF, except for diabetes (only in AS‐HFrEF), with statistically significant interaction predicting death between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide SwedeHF study, we characterized incident HF population after AVI. We found no significant differences in all‐cause and CV mortality compared with general HF population. They had virtually the same predictors for mortality, regardless of LVEF. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8318512/ /pubmed/34057321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13451 Text en © 2021 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Kontogeorgos, Silvana
Thunström, Erik
Pivodic, Aldina
Dahlström, Ulf
Fu, Michael
Prognosis and outcome determinants after heart failure diagnosis in patients who underwent aortic valvular intervention
title Prognosis and outcome determinants after heart failure diagnosis in patients who underwent aortic valvular intervention
title_full Prognosis and outcome determinants after heart failure diagnosis in patients who underwent aortic valvular intervention
title_fullStr Prognosis and outcome determinants after heart failure diagnosis in patients who underwent aortic valvular intervention
title_full_unstemmed Prognosis and outcome determinants after heart failure diagnosis in patients who underwent aortic valvular intervention
title_short Prognosis and outcome determinants after heart failure diagnosis in patients who underwent aortic valvular intervention
title_sort prognosis and outcome determinants after heart failure diagnosis in patients who underwent aortic valvular intervention
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8318512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34057321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13451
work_keys_str_mv AT kontogeorgossilvana prognosisandoutcomedeterminantsafterheartfailurediagnosisinpatientswhounderwentaorticvalvularintervention
AT thunstromerik prognosisandoutcomedeterminantsafterheartfailurediagnosisinpatientswhounderwentaorticvalvularintervention
AT pivodicaldina prognosisandoutcomedeterminantsafterheartfailurediagnosisinpatientswhounderwentaorticvalvularintervention
AT dahlstromulf prognosisandoutcomedeterminantsafterheartfailurediagnosisinpatientswhounderwentaorticvalvularintervention
AT fumichael prognosisandoutcomedeterminantsafterheartfailurediagnosisinpatientswhounderwentaorticvalvularintervention