Cargando…
Multi-Modal Segmentation of 3D Brain Scans Using Neural Networks
Anatomical segmentation of brain scans is highly relevant for diagnostics and neuroradiology research. Conventionally, segmentation is performed on T(1)-weighted MRI scans, due to the strong soft-tissue contrast. In this work, we report on a comparative study of automated, learning-based brain segme...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8318570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335436 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.653375 |
_version_ | 1783730269503619072 |
---|---|
author | Zopes, Jonathan Platscher, Moritz Paganucci, Silvio Federau, Christian |
author_facet | Zopes, Jonathan Platscher, Moritz Paganucci, Silvio Federau, Christian |
author_sort | Zopes, Jonathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Anatomical segmentation of brain scans is highly relevant for diagnostics and neuroradiology research. Conventionally, segmentation is performed on T(1)-weighted MRI scans, due to the strong soft-tissue contrast. In this work, we report on a comparative study of automated, learning-based brain segmentation on various other contrasts of MRI and also computed tomography (CT) scans and investigate the anatomical soft-tissue information contained in these imaging modalities. A large database of in total 853 MRI/CT brain scans enables us to train convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for segmentation. We benchmark the CNN performance on four different imaging modalities and 27 anatomical substructures. For each modality we train a separate CNN based on a common architecture. We find average Dice scores of 86.7 ± 4.1% (T(1)-weighted MRI), 81.9 ± 6.7% (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI), 80.8 ± 6.6% (diffusion-weighted MRI) and 80.7 ± 8.2% (CT), respectively. The performance is assessed relative to labels obtained using the widely-adopted FreeSurfer software package. The segmentation pipeline uses dropout sampling to identify corrupted input scans or low-quality segmentations. Full segmentation of 3D volumes with more than 2 million voxels requires <1s of processing time on a graphical processing unit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8318570 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83185702021-07-29 Multi-Modal Segmentation of 3D Brain Scans Using Neural Networks Zopes, Jonathan Platscher, Moritz Paganucci, Silvio Federau, Christian Front Neurol Neurology Anatomical segmentation of brain scans is highly relevant for diagnostics and neuroradiology research. Conventionally, segmentation is performed on T(1)-weighted MRI scans, due to the strong soft-tissue contrast. In this work, we report on a comparative study of automated, learning-based brain segmentation on various other contrasts of MRI and also computed tomography (CT) scans and investigate the anatomical soft-tissue information contained in these imaging modalities. A large database of in total 853 MRI/CT brain scans enables us to train convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for segmentation. We benchmark the CNN performance on four different imaging modalities and 27 anatomical substructures. For each modality we train a separate CNN based on a common architecture. We find average Dice scores of 86.7 ± 4.1% (T(1)-weighted MRI), 81.9 ± 6.7% (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI), 80.8 ± 6.6% (diffusion-weighted MRI) and 80.7 ± 8.2% (CT), respectively. The performance is assessed relative to labels obtained using the widely-adopted FreeSurfer software package. The segmentation pipeline uses dropout sampling to identify corrupted input scans or low-quality segmentations. Full segmentation of 3D volumes with more than 2 million voxels requires <1s of processing time on a graphical processing unit. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8318570/ /pubmed/34335436 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.653375 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zopes, Platscher, Paganucci and Federau. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Zopes, Jonathan Platscher, Moritz Paganucci, Silvio Federau, Christian Multi-Modal Segmentation of 3D Brain Scans Using Neural Networks |
title | Multi-Modal Segmentation of 3D Brain Scans Using Neural Networks |
title_full | Multi-Modal Segmentation of 3D Brain Scans Using Neural Networks |
title_fullStr | Multi-Modal Segmentation of 3D Brain Scans Using Neural Networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Multi-Modal Segmentation of 3D Brain Scans Using Neural Networks |
title_short | Multi-Modal Segmentation of 3D Brain Scans Using Neural Networks |
title_sort | multi-modal segmentation of 3d brain scans using neural networks |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8318570/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335436 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.653375 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zopesjonathan multimodalsegmentationof3dbrainscansusingneuralnetworks AT platschermoritz multimodalsegmentationof3dbrainscansusingneuralnetworks AT paganuccisilvio multimodalsegmentationof3dbrainscansusingneuralnetworks AT federauchristian multimodalsegmentationof3dbrainscansusingneuralnetworks |