Cargando…

Multi-Modal Segmentation of 3D Brain Scans Using Neural Networks

Anatomical segmentation of brain scans is highly relevant for diagnostics and neuroradiology research. Conventionally, segmentation is performed on T(1)-weighted MRI scans, due to the strong soft-tissue contrast. In this work, we report on a comparative study of automated, learning-based brain segme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zopes, Jonathan, Platscher, Moritz, Paganucci, Silvio, Federau, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8318570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335436
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.653375
_version_ 1783730269503619072
author Zopes, Jonathan
Platscher, Moritz
Paganucci, Silvio
Federau, Christian
author_facet Zopes, Jonathan
Platscher, Moritz
Paganucci, Silvio
Federau, Christian
author_sort Zopes, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description Anatomical segmentation of brain scans is highly relevant for diagnostics and neuroradiology research. Conventionally, segmentation is performed on T(1)-weighted MRI scans, due to the strong soft-tissue contrast. In this work, we report on a comparative study of automated, learning-based brain segmentation on various other contrasts of MRI and also computed tomography (CT) scans and investigate the anatomical soft-tissue information contained in these imaging modalities. A large database of in total 853 MRI/CT brain scans enables us to train convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for segmentation. We benchmark the CNN performance on four different imaging modalities and 27 anatomical substructures. For each modality we train a separate CNN based on a common architecture. We find average Dice scores of 86.7 ± 4.1% (T(1)-weighted MRI), 81.9 ± 6.7% (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI), 80.8 ± 6.6% (diffusion-weighted MRI) and 80.7 ± 8.2% (CT), respectively. The performance is assessed relative to labels obtained using the widely-adopted FreeSurfer software package. The segmentation pipeline uses dropout sampling to identify corrupted input scans or low-quality segmentations. Full segmentation of 3D volumes with more than 2 million voxels requires <1s of processing time on a graphical processing unit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8318570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83185702021-07-29 Multi-Modal Segmentation of 3D Brain Scans Using Neural Networks Zopes, Jonathan Platscher, Moritz Paganucci, Silvio Federau, Christian Front Neurol Neurology Anatomical segmentation of brain scans is highly relevant for diagnostics and neuroradiology research. Conventionally, segmentation is performed on T(1)-weighted MRI scans, due to the strong soft-tissue contrast. In this work, we report on a comparative study of automated, learning-based brain segmentation on various other contrasts of MRI and also computed tomography (CT) scans and investigate the anatomical soft-tissue information contained in these imaging modalities. A large database of in total 853 MRI/CT brain scans enables us to train convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for segmentation. We benchmark the CNN performance on four different imaging modalities and 27 anatomical substructures. For each modality we train a separate CNN based on a common architecture. We find average Dice scores of 86.7 ± 4.1% (T(1)-weighted MRI), 81.9 ± 6.7% (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI), 80.8 ± 6.6% (diffusion-weighted MRI) and 80.7 ± 8.2% (CT), respectively. The performance is assessed relative to labels obtained using the widely-adopted FreeSurfer software package. The segmentation pipeline uses dropout sampling to identify corrupted input scans or low-quality segmentations. Full segmentation of 3D volumes with more than 2 million voxels requires <1s of processing time on a graphical processing unit. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8318570/ /pubmed/34335436 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.653375 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zopes, Platscher, Paganucci and Federau. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Zopes, Jonathan
Platscher, Moritz
Paganucci, Silvio
Federau, Christian
Multi-Modal Segmentation of 3D Brain Scans Using Neural Networks
title Multi-Modal Segmentation of 3D Brain Scans Using Neural Networks
title_full Multi-Modal Segmentation of 3D Brain Scans Using Neural Networks
title_fullStr Multi-Modal Segmentation of 3D Brain Scans Using Neural Networks
title_full_unstemmed Multi-Modal Segmentation of 3D Brain Scans Using Neural Networks
title_short Multi-Modal Segmentation of 3D Brain Scans Using Neural Networks
title_sort multi-modal segmentation of 3d brain scans using neural networks
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8318570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335436
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.653375
work_keys_str_mv AT zopesjonathan multimodalsegmentationof3dbrainscansusingneuralnetworks
AT platschermoritz multimodalsegmentationof3dbrainscansusingneuralnetworks
AT paganuccisilvio multimodalsegmentationof3dbrainscansusingneuralnetworks
AT federauchristian multimodalsegmentationof3dbrainscansusingneuralnetworks