Cargando…
Focal Neurologic Deficit After Epidural Catheter Removal Leads to Meningioma Diagnosis
We present an unusual case of a 60-year-old female who developed subtle, new-onset left upper and lower extremity weakness on day five of perioperative thoracic epidural placement. The onset of a focal neurological deficit after epidural placement usually raises suspicion for the presence of an epid...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34336505 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16015 |
Sumario: | We present an unusual case of a 60-year-old female who developed subtle, new-onset left upper and lower extremity weakness on day five of perioperative thoracic epidural placement. The onset of a focal neurological deficit after epidural placement usually raises suspicion for the presence of an epidural hematoma, abscess, or traumatic cord lesion. However, in this patient, brain imaging revealed a large, previously undiagnosed intracranial mass. Classically, the risk of mass-related intracranial pressure shifts leading to neurological changes is associated with spinal techniques, including diagnostic lumbar puncture, combined spinal-epidural catheter analgesia, and unintended dural puncture during epidural placement. However, based on this case and our summary of case reports in the literature, we determined that symptom onset associated with an intracranial mass may also arise after apparently uncomplicated epidural placement. Symptom onset in our case series ranged from six hours to ten days and was highly variable depending on tumor location, with reported signs and symptoms including headache, vision changes, focal deficits, or alterations of consciousness. Further studies are required to establish definitive causation between the epidural technique and changes in cerebrospinal fluid pressures leading to symptom onset. Though rare, this is a time-sensitive diagnosis that must be considered for any patient with unexplained neurological findings after neuraxial anesthesia. |
---|