Cargando…

Bone remodeling around implants placed after socket preservation: a 10-year retrospective radiological study

BACKGROUND: To evaluate and compare the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of post-extraction sockets after ridge preservation either with porcine xenograft or collagen alone. Patients underwent single-tooth extraction in the posterior mandible. Fresh extraction sockets were filled with pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberto, Crespi, Paolo, Toti, Giovanni, Crespi, Ugo, Covani, Bruno, Brevi, Giovanni-Battista, Menchini-Fabris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00354-7
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: To evaluate and compare the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of post-extraction sockets after ridge preservation either with porcine xenograft or collagen alone. Patients underwent single-tooth extraction in the posterior mandible. Fresh extraction sockets were filled with pre-hydrated cortico-cancellous porcine bone or collagen sponge. Two or 3 months later, a ridge expansion technique with immediate implant positioning placement was performed. Primary (alveolar width changes) and secondary outcomes (adverse events and long-term maintenance of buccal plate covering the implant) were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-four women and 20 men were selected: 30 implants (group A) placed into healed post-extraction sockets grafted with porcine bone and 24 (group B) into sockets filled with a collagen sponge. There was a significant loss in width in both groups from the first and second surgery (ranging between 2.7 mm and 4.5 mm). The ridge splitting with bone expansion resulted in significant long-term increases in width for both procedures and implant sites. Non-significant differences in alveolar width were registered between the groups at 10-year follow-up even if the analysis of the implant buccal bone coverage suggested that group A had significantly worst results. CONCLUSIONS: Porcine bone group had significantly better short-term outcomes with lower long-term maintenance of the buccal plate.