Cargando…

Bone remodeling around implants placed after socket preservation: a 10-year retrospective radiological study

BACKGROUND: To evaluate and compare the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of post-extraction sockets after ridge preservation either with porcine xenograft or collagen alone. Patients underwent single-tooth extraction in the posterior mandible. Fresh extraction sockets were filled with pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberto, Crespi, Paolo, Toti, Giovanni, Crespi, Ugo, Covani, Bruno, Brevi, Giovanni-Battista, Menchini-Fabris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00354-7
_version_ 1783730412921552896
author Roberto, Crespi
Paolo, Toti
Giovanni, Crespi
Ugo, Covani
Bruno, Brevi
Giovanni-Battista, Menchini-Fabris
author_facet Roberto, Crespi
Paolo, Toti
Giovanni, Crespi
Ugo, Covani
Bruno, Brevi
Giovanni-Battista, Menchini-Fabris
author_sort Roberto, Crespi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate and compare the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of post-extraction sockets after ridge preservation either with porcine xenograft or collagen alone. Patients underwent single-tooth extraction in the posterior mandible. Fresh extraction sockets were filled with pre-hydrated cortico-cancellous porcine bone or collagen sponge. Two or 3 months later, a ridge expansion technique with immediate implant positioning placement was performed. Primary (alveolar width changes) and secondary outcomes (adverse events and long-term maintenance of buccal plate covering the implant) were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-four women and 20 men were selected: 30 implants (group A) placed into healed post-extraction sockets grafted with porcine bone and 24 (group B) into sockets filled with a collagen sponge. There was a significant loss in width in both groups from the first and second surgery (ranging between 2.7 mm and 4.5 mm). The ridge splitting with bone expansion resulted in significant long-term increases in width for both procedures and implant sites. Non-significant differences in alveolar width were registered between the groups at 10-year follow-up even if the analysis of the implant buccal bone coverage suggested that group A had significantly worst results. CONCLUSIONS: Porcine bone group had significantly better short-term outcomes with lower long-term maintenance of the buccal plate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8319280
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83192802021-08-02 Bone remodeling around implants placed after socket preservation: a 10-year retrospective radiological study Roberto, Crespi Paolo, Toti Giovanni, Crespi Ugo, Covani Bruno, Brevi Giovanni-Battista, Menchini-Fabris Int J Implant Dent Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate and compare the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of post-extraction sockets after ridge preservation either with porcine xenograft or collagen alone. Patients underwent single-tooth extraction in the posterior mandible. Fresh extraction sockets were filled with pre-hydrated cortico-cancellous porcine bone or collagen sponge. Two or 3 months later, a ridge expansion technique with immediate implant positioning placement was performed. Primary (alveolar width changes) and secondary outcomes (adverse events and long-term maintenance of buccal plate covering the implant) were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-four women and 20 men were selected: 30 implants (group A) placed into healed post-extraction sockets grafted with porcine bone and 24 (group B) into sockets filled with a collagen sponge. There was a significant loss in width in both groups from the first and second surgery (ranging between 2.7 mm and 4.5 mm). The ridge splitting with bone expansion resulted in significant long-term increases in width for both procedures and implant sites. Non-significant differences in alveolar width were registered between the groups at 10-year follow-up even if the analysis of the implant buccal bone coverage suggested that group A had significantly worst results. CONCLUSIONS: Porcine bone group had significantly better short-term outcomes with lower long-term maintenance of the buccal plate. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8319280/ /pubmed/34322836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00354-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Roberto, Crespi
Paolo, Toti
Giovanni, Crespi
Ugo, Covani
Bruno, Brevi
Giovanni-Battista, Menchini-Fabris
Bone remodeling around implants placed after socket preservation: a 10-year retrospective radiological study
title Bone remodeling around implants placed after socket preservation: a 10-year retrospective radiological study
title_full Bone remodeling around implants placed after socket preservation: a 10-year retrospective radiological study
title_fullStr Bone remodeling around implants placed after socket preservation: a 10-year retrospective radiological study
title_full_unstemmed Bone remodeling around implants placed after socket preservation: a 10-year retrospective radiological study
title_short Bone remodeling around implants placed after socket preservation: a 10-year retrospective radiological study
title_sort bone remodeling around implants placed after socket preservation: a 10-year retrospective radiological study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00354-7
work_keys_str_mv AT robertocrespi boneremodelingaroundimplantsplacedaftersocketpreservationa10yearretrospectiveradiologicalstudy
AT paolototi boneremodelingaroundimplantsplacedaftersocketpreservationa10yearretrospectiveradiologicalstudy
AT giovannicrespi boneremodelingaroundimplantsplacedaftersocketpreservationa10yearretrospectiveradiologicalstudy
AT ugocovani boneremodelingaroundimplantsplacedaftersocketpreservationa10yearretrospectiveradiologicalstudy
AT brunobrevi boneremodelingaroundimplantsplacedaftersocketpreservationa10yearretrospectiveradiologicalstudy
AT giovannibattistamenchinifabris boneremodelingaroundimplantsplacedaftersocketpreservationa10yearretrospectiveradiologicalstudy