Cargando…

Matrix 3D ultrasound-assisted thyroid nodule volume estimation and radiofrequency ablation: a phantom study

BACKGROUND: Two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound is well established for thyroid nodule assessment and treatment guidance. However, it is hampered by a limited field of view and observer variability that may lead to inaccurate nodule classification and treatment. To cope with these limitations, we invest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boers, T., Braak, S. J., Versluis, M., Manohar, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-021-00230-4
_version_ 1783730413153288192
author Boers, T.
Braak, S. J.
Versluis, M.
Manohar, S.
author_facet Boers, T.
Braak, S. J.
Versluis, M.
Manohar, S.
author_sort Boers, T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound is well established for thyroid nodule assessment and treatment guidance. However, it is hampered by a limited field of view and observer variability that may lead to inaccurate nodule classification and treatment. To cope with these limitations, we investigated the use of real-time three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound to improve the accuracy of volume estimation and needle placement during radiofrequency ablation. We assess a new 3D matrix transducer for nodule volume estimation and image-guided radiofrequency ablation. METHODS: Thirty thyroid nodule phantoms with thermochromic dye underwent volume estimation and ablation guided by a 2D linear and 3D mechanically-swept array and a 3D matrix transducer. RESULTS: The 3D matrix nodule volume estimations had a lower median difference with the ground truth (0.4 mL) compared to the standard 2D approach (2.2 mL, p < 0.001) and mechanically swept 3D transducer (2.0 mL, p = 0.016). The 3D matrix-guided ablation resulted in a similar nodule ablation coverage when compared to 2D-guidance (76.7% versus 80.8%, p = 0.542). The 3D mechanically swept transducer performed worse (60.1%, p = 0.015). However, 3D matrix and 2D guidance ablations lead to a larger ablated volume outside the nodule than 3D mechanically swept (5.1 mL, 4.2 mL (p = 0.274), 0.5 mL (p < 0.001), respectively). The 3D matrix and mechanically swept approaches were faster with 80 and 72.5 s/mL ablated than 2D with 105.5 s/mL ablated. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D matrix transducer estimates volumes more accurately and can facilitate accurate needle placement while reducing procedure time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8319281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83192812021-08-02 Matrix 3D ultrasound-assisted thyroid nodule volume estimation and radiofrequency ablation: a phantom study Boers, T. Braak, S. J. Versluis, M. Manohar, S. Eur Radiol Exp Original Article BACKGROUND: Two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound is well established for thyroid nodule assessment and treatment guidance. However, it is hampered by a limited field of view and observer variability that may lead to inaccurate nodule classification and treatment. To cope with these limitations, we investigated the use of real-time three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound to improve the accuracy of volume estimation and needle placement during radiofrequency ablation. We assess a new 3D matrix transducer for nodule volume estimation and image-guided radiofrequency ablation. METHODS: Thirty thyroid nodule phantoms with thermochromic dye underwent volume estimation and ablation guided by a 2D linear and 3D mechanically-swept array and a 3D matrix transducer. RESULTS: The 3D matrix nodule volume estimations had a lower median difference with the ground truth (0.4 mL) compared to the standard 2D approach (2.2 mL, p < 0.001) and mechanically swept 3D transducer (2.0 mL, p = 0.016). The 3D matrix-guided ablation resulted in a similar nodule ablation coverage when compared to 2D-guidance (76.7% versus 80.8%, p = 0.542). The 3D mechanically swept transducer performed worse (60.1%, p = 0.015). However, 3D matrix and 2D guidance ablations lead to a larger ablated volume outside the nodule than 3D mechanically swept (5.1 mL, 4.2 mL (p = 0.274), 0.5 mL (p < 0.001), respectively). The 3D matrix and mechanically swept approaches were faster with 80 and 72.5 s/mL ablated than 2D with 105.5 s/mL ablated. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D matrix transducer estimates volumes more accurately and can facilitate accurate needle placement while reducing procedure time. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8319281/ /pubmed/34322765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-021-00230-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Boers, T.
Braak, S. J.
Versluis, M.
Manohar, S.
Matrix 3D ultrasound-assisted thyroid nodule volume estimation and radiofrequency ablation: a phantom study
title Matrix 3D ultrasound-assisted thyroid nodule volume estimation and radiofrequency ablation: a phantom study
title_full Matrix 3D ultrasound-assisted thyroid nodule volume estimation and radiofrequency ablation: a phantom study
title_fullStr Matrix 3D ultrasound-assisted thyroid nodule volume estimation and radiofrequency ablation: a phantom study
title_full_unstemmed Matrix 3D ultrasound-assisted thyroid nodule volume estimation and radiofrequency ablation: a phantom study
title_short Matrix 3D ultrasound-assisted thyroid nodule volume estimation and radiofrequency ablation: a phantom study
title_sort matrix 3d ultrasound-assisted thyroid nodule volume estimation and radiofrequency ablation: a phantom study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34322765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-021-00230-4
work_keys_str_mv AT boerst matrix3dultrasoundassistedthyroidnodulevolumeestimationandradiofrequencyablationaphantomstudy
AT braaksj matrix3dultrasoundassistedthyroidnodulevolumeestimationandradiofrequencyablationaphantomstudy
AT versluism matrix3dultrasoundassistedthyroidnodulevolumeestimationandradiofrequencyablationaphantomstudy
AT manohars matrix3dultrasoundassistedthyroidnodulevolumeestimationandradiofrequencyablationaphantomstudy