Cargando…
Effect of almond hulls on the performance, egg quality, nutrient digestibility, and body composition of laying hens
The objective of this study was to evaluate 2 varieties of almond hulls (prime and California type hulls) as an alternative feed ingredient on the performance, egg quality, nutrient digestibility, and body composition using a total of 100 23-week-old Hy-Line W36 hens. Treatments consisted of a contr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34289427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101286 |
_version_ | 1783730478836088832 |
---|---|
author | Wang, J. Kong, F. Kim, W.K. |
author_facet | Wang, J. Kong, F. Kim, W.K. |
author_sort | Wang, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this study was to evaluate 2 varieties of almond hulls (prime and California type hulls) as an alternative feed ingredient on the performance, egg quality, nutrient digestibility, and body composition using a total of 100 23-week-old Hy-Line W36 hens. Treatments consisted of a control diet based on corn and soybean meal; T2 and T3 were formulated to contain 7.5 and 15% of prime hulls; and T4 and T5 contained 7.5 and 15% of California type hulls. Inclusion of prime hulls and California type hulls had no effects on feed intake, egg laying rate, and feed conversion ratio, but California type hulls at 7.5% decreased (P < 0.001) body weight gain compared to the control. Prime hulls at 7.5% and California type hulls at both levels improved (P ≤ 0.022) AMEn and N digestibility. Both prime hulls and California type hulls had no effects on egg size, specific gravity, Haugh unit, and percentages of yolk, albumen and shell, but yolk color appeared greener and less yellow (P ≤ 0.009) by prime hulls and less yellow (P = 0.001) by California type hulls. For body composition, prime hulls and California type hulls at both levels lowered (P ≤ 0.017) body fat, and California type hulls at 7.5% decreased (P = 0.001) lean weight. In summary, inclusion of prime hulls and California type hulls up to 15% had no negative effect on egg production and egg quality while reduced the body fat percentage and mass. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8319578 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83195782021-08-02 Effect of almond hulls on the performance, egg quality, nutrient digestibility, and body composition of laying hens Wang, J. Kong, F. Kim, W.K. Poult Sci METABOLISM AND NUTRITION The objective of this study was to evaluate 2 varieties of almond hulls (prime and California type hulls) as an alternative feed ingredient on the performance, egg quality, nutrient digestibility, and body composition using a total of 100 23-week-old Hy-Line W36 hens. Treatments consisted of a control diet based on corn and soybean meal; T2 and T3 were formulated to contain 7.5 and 15% of prime hulls; and T4 and T5 contained 7.5 and 15% of California type hulls. Inclusion of prime hulls and California type hulls had no effects on feed intake, egg laying rate, and feed conversion ratio, but California type hulls at 7.5% decreased (P < 0.001) body weight gain compared to the control. Prime hulls at 7.5% and California type hulls at both levels improved (P ≤ 0.022) AMEn and N digestibility. Both prime hulls and California type hulls had no effects on egg size, specific gravity, Haugh unit, and percentages of yolk, albumen and shell, but yolk color appeared greener and less yellow (P ≤ 0.009) by prime hulls and less yellow (P = 0.001) by California type hulls. For body composition, prime hulls and California type hulls at both levels lowered (P ≤ 0.017) body fat, and California type hulls at 7.5% decreased (P = 0.001) lean weight. In summary, inclusion of prime hulls and California type hulls up to 15% had no negative effect on egg production and egg quality while reduced the body fat percentage and mass. Elsevier 2021-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8319578/ /pubmed/34289427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101286 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | METABOLISM AND NUTRITION Wang, J. Kong, F. Kim, W.K. Effect of almond hulls on the performance, egg quality, nutrient digestibility, and body composition of laying hens |
title | Effect of almond hulls on the performance, egg quality, nutrient digestibility, and body composition of laying hens |
title_full | Effect of almond hulls on the performance, egg quality, nutrient digestibility, and body composition of laying hens |
title_fullStr | Effect of almond hulls on the performance, egg quality, nutrient digestibility, and body composition of laying hens |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of almond hulls on the performance, egg quality, nutrient digestibility, and body composition of laying hens |
title_short | Effect of almond hulls on the performance, egg quality, nutrient digestibility, and body composition of laying hens |
title_sort | effect of almond hulls on the performance, egg quality, nutrient digestibility, and body composition of laying hens |
topic | METABOLISM AND NUTRITION |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34289427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101286 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangj effectofalmondhullsontheperformanceeggqualitynutrientdigestibilityandbodycompositionoflayinghens AT kongf effectofalmondhullsontheperformanceeggqualitynutrientdigestibilityandbodycompositionoflayinghens AT kimwk effectofalmondhullsontheperformanceeggqualitynutrientdigestibilityandbodycompositionoflayinghens |