Cargando…

A Literature Review to Assess Blood Loss in Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery Versus in Open Liver Resection

Aim and objectives The aim of the study was to assess the amount of blood loss in minimally invasive hepatectomy and open liver resection for both benign and neoplastic conditions. Introduction Minimally invasive surgery has progressively developed to a stage where once-novel and highly specialized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elmahi, Eiad, Salama, Yahya, Cadden, Fergal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34336498
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16008
_version_ 1783730491943288832
author Elmahi, Eiad
Salama, Yahya
Cadden, Fergal
author_facet Elmahi, Eiad
Salama, Yahya
Cadden, Fergal
author_sort Elmahi, Eiad
collection PubMed
description Aim and objectives The aim of the study was to assess the amount of blood loss in minimally invasive hepatectomy and open liver resection for both benign and neoplastic conditions. Introduction Minimally invasive surgery has progressively developed to a stage where once-novel and highly specialized surgical techniques are now common practice. Colorectal surgery is the key example that has shown minimally invasive surgery as highly beneficial. Successes in the colorectal laparoscopic approach have now been integrated into the speciality of hepatopancreaticobiiary (HPB) surgery. In this review, we will compare the amount of blood loss in minimally invasive liver resection with the more traditional approach of open liver resection. Methods A literature review was conducted which included the length of patient mobilization as a postoperative complication following laparoscopic and open liver resections. Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane were accessed to review previously published studies. Twelve studies were selected, and all of them were in English, ranged from the year 2000 to 2020. Results Eleven out of the 12 included studies indicated that minimally invasive liver resection is associated with reduced blood loss. Conclusion In comparing both minimally invasive liver resection and classic open surgery, minimally invasive liver resection was shown to have reduced blood loss; this was seen in both malignant and benign tumours. Therefore, laparoscopic liver resection could be favoured over the classical open approach to avoid excessive blood loss intra-operatively
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8319637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83196372021-07-31 A Literature Review to Assess Blood Loss in Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery Versus in Open Liver Resection Elmahi, Eiad Salama, Yahya Cadden, Fergal Cureus General Surgery Aim and objectives The aim of the study was to assess the amount of blood loss in minimally invasive hepatectomy and open liver resection for both benign and neoplastic conditions. Introduction Minimally invasive surgery has progressively developed to a stage where once-novel and highly specialized surgical techniques are now common practice. Colorectal surgery is the key example that has shown minimally invasive surgery as highly beneficial. Successes in the colorectal laparoscopic approach have now been integrated into the speciality of hepatopancreaticobiiary (HPB) surgery. In this review, we will compare the amount of blood loss in minimally invasive liver resection with the more traditional approach of open liver resection. Methods A literature review was conducted which included the length of patient mobilization as a postoperative complication following laparoscopic and open liver resections. Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane were accessed to review previously published studies. Twelve studies were selected, and all of them were in English, ranged from the year 2000 to 2020. Results Eleven out of the 12 included studies indicated that minimally invasive liver resection is associated with reduced blood loss. Conclusion In comparing both minimally invasive liver resection and classic open surgery, minimally invasive liver resection was shown to have reduced blood loss; this was seen in both malignant and benign tumours. Therefore, laparoscopic liver resection could be favoured over the classical open approach to avoid excessive blood loss intra-operatively Cureus 2021-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8319637/ /pubmed/34336498 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16008 Text en Copyright © 2021, Elmahi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle General Surgery
Elmahi, Eiad
Salama, Yahya
Cadden, Fergal
A Literature Review to Assess Blood Loss in Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery Versus in Open Liver Resection
title A Literature Review to Assess Blood Loss in Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery Versus in Open Liver Resection
title_full A Literature Review to Assess Blood Loss in Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery Versus in Open Liver Resection
title_fullStr A Literature Review to Assess Blood Loss in Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery Versus in Open Liver Resection
title_full_unstemmed A Literature Review to Assess Blood Loss in Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery Versus in Open Liver Resection
title_short A Literature Review to Assess Blood Loss in Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery Versus in Open Liver Resection
title_sort literature review to assess blood loss in minimally invasive liver surgery versus in open liver resection
topic General Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34336498
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16008
work_keys_str_mv AT elmahieiad aliteraturereviewtoassessbloodlossinminimallyinvasiveliversurgeryversusinopenliverresection
AT salamayahya aliteraturereviewtoassessbloodlossinminimallyinvasiveliversurgeryversusinopenliverresection
AT caddenfergal aliteraturereviewtoassessbloodlossinminimallyinvasiveliversurgeryversusinopenliverresection
AT elmahieiad literaturereviewtoassessbloodlossinminimallyinvasiveliversurgeryversusinopenliverresection
AT salamayahya literaturereviewtoassessbloodlossinminimallyinvasiveliversurgeryversusinopenliverresection
AT caddenfergal literaturereviewtoassessbloodlossinminimallyinvasiveliversurgeryversusinopenliverresection