Cargando…

Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence and Computer-Aided Diagnosis for the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) by allowing detection and resection of neoplastic polyps. Evidence shows that many small polyps are missed on a single colonoscopy. There has been a successful adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to tackle the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nazarian, Scarlet, Glover, Ben, Ashrafian, Hutan, Darzi, Ara, Teare, Julian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34259645
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27370
_version_ 1783730525334142976
author Nazarian, Scarlet
Glover, Ben
Ashrafian, Hutan
Darzi, Ara
Teare, Julian
author_facet Nazarian, Scarlet
Glover, Ben
Ashrafian, Hutan
Darzi, Ara
Teare, Julian
author_sort Nazarian, Scarlet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) by allowing detection and resection of neoplastic polyps. Evidence shows that many small polyps are missed on a single colonoscopy. There has been a successful adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to tackle the issues around missed polyps and as tools to increase the adenoma detection rate (ADR). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of AI-based technologies in assessing colorectal polyps. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was undertaken using the databases of Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed. Studies reporting the use of computer-aided diagnosis for polyp detection or characterization during colonoscopy were included. Independent proportions and their differences were calculated and pooled through DerSimonian and Laird random-effects modeling. RESULTS: A total of 48 studies were included. The meta-analysis showed a significant increase in pooled polyp detection rate in patients with the use of AI for polyp detection during colonoscopy compared with patients who had standard colonoscopy (odds ratio [OR] 1.75, 95% CI 1.56-1.96; P<.001). When comparing patients undergoing colonoscopy with the use of AI to those without, there was also a significant increase in ADR (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.32-1.77; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: With the aid of machine learning, there is potential to improve ADR and, consequently, reduce the incidence of CRC. The current generation of AI-based systems demonstrate impressive accuracy for the detection and characterization of colorectal polyps. However, this is an evolving field and before its adoption into a clinical setting, AI systems must prove worthy to patients and clinicians. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020169786; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020169786
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8319784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83197842021-08-11 Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence and Computer-Aided Diagnosis for the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Nazarian, Scarlet Glover, Ben Ashrafian, Hutan Darzi, Ara Teare, Julian J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) by allowing detection and resection of neoplastic polyps. Evidence shows that many small polyps are missed on a single colonoscopy. There has been a successful adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to tackle the issues around missed polyps and as tools to increase the adenoma detection rate (ADR). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of AI-based technologies in assessing colorectal polyps. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was undertaken using the databases of Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed. Studies reporting the use of computer-aided diagnosis for polyp detection or characterization during colonoscopy were included. Independent proportions and their differences were calculated and pooled through DerSimonian and Laird random-effects modeling. RESULTS: A total of 48 studies were included. The meta-analysis showed a significant increase in pooled polyp detection rate in patients with the use of AI for polyp detection during colonoscopy compared with patients who had standard colonoscopy (odds ratio [OR] 1.75, 95% CI 1.56-1.96; P<.001). When comparing patients undergoing colonoscopy with the use of AI to those without, there was also a significant increase in ADR (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.32-1.77; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: With the aid of machine learning, there is potential to improve ADR and, consequently, reduce the incidence of CRC. The current generation of AI-based systems demonstrate impressive accuracy for the detection and characterization of colorectal polyps. However, this is an evolving field and before its adoption into a clinical setting, AI systems must prove worthy to patients and clinicians. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020169786; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020169786 JMIR Publications 2021-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8319784/ /pubmed/34259645 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27370 Text en ©Scarlet Nazarian, Ben Glover, Hutan Ashrafian, Ara Darzi, Julian Teare. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 14.07.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Nazarian, Scarlet
Glover, Ben
Ashrafian, Hutan
Darzi, Ara
Teare, Julian
Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence and Computer-Aided Diagnosis for the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence and Computer-Aided Diagnosis for the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence and Computer-Aided Diagnosis for the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence and Computer-Aided Diagnosis for the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence and Computer-Aided Diagnosis for the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence and Computer-Aided Diagnosis for the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence and computer-aided diagnosis for the detection and characterization of colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34259645
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27370
work_keys_str_mv AT nazarianscarlet diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceandcomputeraideddiagnosisforthedetectionandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gloverben diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceandcomputeraideddiagnosisforthedetectionandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ashrafianhutan diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceandcomputeraideddiagnosisforthedetectionandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT darziara diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceandcomputeraideddiagnosisforthedetectionandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tearejulian diagnosticaccuracyofartificialintelligenceandcomputeraideddiagnosisforthedetectionandcharacterizationofcolorectalpolypssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis