Cargando…
Contemporaneous Comparison of Outcomes Among Patients Implanted With a Leadless vs Transvenous Single-Chamber Ventricular Pacemaker
IMPORTANCE: The safety and efficacy of leadless VVI pacemakers have been demonstrated in multiple clinical trials, but the comparative performance of the device in a large, real-world population has not been examined. OBJECTIVE: To compare patient characteristics and complications among patients imp...
Autores principales: | Piccini, Jonathan P., El-Chami, Mikhael, Wherry, Kael, Crossley, George H., Kowal, Robert C., Stromberg, Kurt, Longacre, Colleen, Hinnenthal, Jennifer, Bockstedt, Lindsay |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34319383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2021.2621 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up
por: El-Chami, Mikhael F, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Two-year outcomes of leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemaker in high-risk subgroups
por: Boveda, Serge, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Using Medicare Claims to Identify Acute Clinical Events Following Implantation of Leadless Pacemakers
por: Wherry, Kael, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Leadless pacemakers: a contemporary review
por: Bhatia, Neal, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Leadless pacemaker implant with concomitant atrioventricular node ablation: Experience with the Micra transcatheter pacemaker
por: El‐Chami, Mikhael F., et al.
Publicado: (2021)