Cargando…
Lower response to BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with myelofibrosis compared to polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia
In a population of 42 Philadelphia negative myeloproliferative neoplasm patients, all on systemic active treatment, the likelihood of responding to anti-SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine at 2 weeks after the second dose was significantly lower in the ten patients with myelofibrosis compared to the 32 with...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34325728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13045-021-01130-1 |
_version_ | 1783730545083023360 |
---|---|
author | Pimpinelli, Fulvia Marchesi, Francesco Piaggio, Giulia Giannarelli, Diana Papa, Elena Falcucci, Paolo Spadea, Antonio Pontone, Martina Di Martino, Simona Laquintana, Valentina La Malfa, Antonia Di Domenico, Enea Gino Di Bella, Ornella Falzone, Gianluca Ensoli, Fabrizio Vujovic, Branka Morrone, Aldo Ciliberto, Gennaro Mengarelli, Andrea |
author_facet | Pimpinelli, Fulvia Marchesi, Francesco Piaggio, Giulia Giannarelli, Diana Papa, Elena Falcucci, Paolo Spadea, Antonio Pontone, Martina Di Martino, Simona Laquintana, Valentina La Malfa, Antonia Di Domenico, Enea Gino Di Bella, Ornella Falzone, Gianluca Ensoli, Fabrizio Vujovic, Branka Morrone, Aldo Ciliberto, Gennaro Mengarelli, Andrea |
author_sort | Pimpinelli, Fulvia |
collection | PubMed |
description | In a population of 42 Philadelphia negative myeloproliferative neoplasm patients, all on systemic active treatment, the likelihood of responding to anti-SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine at 2 weeks after the second dose was significantly lower in the ten patients with myelofibrosis compared to the 32 with essential thrombocythemia (n = 17) and polycythemia vera (n = 15) grouped together, both in terms of neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers and seroprotection rates (32.47 AU/mL vs 217.97 AU/mL, p = 0.003 and 60% vs 93.8%, p = 0.021, respectively). Ruxolitinib, which was the ongoing treatment in five patients with myelofibrosis and three with polycythemia vera, may be implicated in reducing vaccine immunogenicity (p = 0.076), though large prospective study is needed to address this issue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8319901 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83199012021-07-29 Lower response to BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with myelofibrosis compared to polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia Pimpinelli, Fulvia Marchesi, Francesco Piaggio, Giulia Giannarelli, Diana Papa, Elena Falcucci, Paolo Spadea, Antonio Pontone, Martina Di Martino, Simona Laquintana, Valentina La Malfa, Antonia Di Domenico, Enea Gino Di Bella, Ornella Falzone, Gianluca Ensoli, Fabrizio Vujovic, Branka Morrone, Aldo Ciliberto, Gennaro Mengarelli, Andrea J Hematol Oncol Letter to the Editor In a population of 42 Philadelphia negative myeloproliferative neoplasm patients, all on systemic active treatment, the likelihood of responding to anti-SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine at 2 weeks after the second dose was significantly lower in the ten patients with myelofibrosis compared to the 32 with essential thrombocythemia (n = 17) and polycythemia vera (n = 15) grouped together, both in terms of neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers and seroprotection rates (32.47 AU/mL vs 217.97 AU/mL, p = 0.003 and 60% vs 93.8%, p = 0.021, respectively). Ruxolitinib, which was the ongoing treatment in five patients with myelofibrosis and three with polycythemia vera, may be implicated in reducing vaccine immunogenicity (p = 0.076), though large prospective study is needed to address this issue. BioMed Central 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8319901/ /pubmed/34325728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13045-021-01130-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Letter to the Editor Pimpinelli, Fulvia Marchesi, Francesco Piaggio, Giulia Giannarelli, Diana Papa, Elena Falcucci, Paolo Spadea, Antonio Pontone, Martina Di Martino, Simona Laquintana, Valentina La Malfa, Antonia Di Domenico, Enea Gino Di Bella, Ornella Falzone, Gianluca Ensoli, Fabrizio Vujovic, Branka Morrone, Aldo Ciliberto, Gennaro Mengarelli, Andrea Lower response to BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with myelofibrosis compared to polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia |
title | Lower response to BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with myelofibrosis compared to polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia |
title_full | Lower response to BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with myelofibrosis compared to polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia |
title_fullStr | Lower response to BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with myelofibrosis compared to polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia |
title_full_unstemmed | Lower response to BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with myelofibrosis compared to polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia |
title_short | Lower response to BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with myelofibrosis compared to polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia |
title_sort | lower response to bnt162b2 vaccine in patients with myelofibrosis compared to polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia |
topic | Letter to the Editor |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34325728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13045-021-01130-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pimpinellifulvia lowerresponsetobnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyelofibrosiscomparedtopolycythemiaveraandessentialthrombocythemia AT marchesifrancesco lowerresponsetobnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyelofibrosiscomparedtopolycythemiaveraandessentialthrombocythemia AT piaggiogiulia lowerresponsetobnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyelofibrosiscomparedtopolycythemiaveraandessentialthrombocythemia AT giannarellidiana lowerresponsetobnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyelofibrosiscomparedtopolycythemiaveraandessentialthrombocythemia AT papaelena lowerresponsetobnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyelofibrosiscomparedtopolycythemiaveraandessentialthrombocythemia AT falcuccipaolo lowerresponsetobnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyelofibrosiscomparedtopolycythemiaveraandessentialthrombocythemia AT spadeaantonio lowerresponsetobnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyelofibrosiscomparedtopolycythemiaveraandessentialthrombocythemia AT pontonemartina lowerresponsetobnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyelofibrosiscomparedtopolycythemiaveraandessentialthrombocythemia AT dimartinosimona lowerresponsetobnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyelofibrosiscomparedtopolycythemiaveraandessentialthrombocythemia AT laquintanavalentina lowerresponsetobnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyelofibrosiscomparedtopolycythemiaveraandessentialthrombocythemia AT lamalfaantonia lowerresponsetobnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyelofibrosiscomparedtopolycythemiaveraandessentialthrombocythemia AT didomenicoeneagino lowerresponsetobnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyelofibrosiscomparedtopolycythemiaveraandessentialthrombocythemia AT dibellaornella lowerresponsetobnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyelofibrosiscomparedtopolycythemiaveraandessentialthrombocythemia AT falzonegianluca lowerresponsetobnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyelofibrosiscomparedtopolycythemiaveraandessentialthrombocythemia AT ensolifabrizio lowerresponsetobnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyelofibrosiscomparedtopolycythemiaveraandessentialthrombocythemia AT vujovicbranka lowerresponsetobnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyelofibrosiscomparedtopolycythemiaveraandessentialthrombocythemia AT morronealdo lowerresponsetobnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyelofibrosiscomparedtopolycythemiaveraandessentialthrombocythemia AT cilibertogennaro lowerresponsetobnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyelofibrosiscomparedtopolycythemiaveraandessentialthrombocythemia AT mengarelliandrea lowerresponsetobnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyelofibrosiscomparedtopolycythemiaveraandessentialthrombocythemia |