Cargando…

Use of complexity theory in health and social care: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION: Despite the use of a wide variety of improvement tools and approaches, healthcare organisations continue to struggle in several key areas. Complexity-informed approaches have the potential to offer health and social care a new paradigm for understanding, designing, implementing and eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carroll, Aine, Stokes, Diarmuid, Darley, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34321301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047633
_version_ 1783730558932615168
author Carroll, Aine
Stokes, Diarmuid
Darley, Andrew
author_facet Carroll, Aine
Stokes, Diarmuid
Darley, Andrew
author_sort Carroll, Aine
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite the use of a wide variety of improvement tools and approaches, healthcare organisations continue to struggle in several key areas. Complexity-informed approaches have the potential to offer health and social care a new paradigm for understanding, designing, implementing and evaluating solutions, yet so far has failed to gain the traction anticipated some years ago. There is a growing need for high quality syntheses of the existing knowledge base in this area and given the diversity of theory and approaches, a scoping review is the best approach to curate this knowledge. METHODS: A scoping review of relevant literature from January 2000 to present, using the refined Arksey and O’Malley six-stage framework will be conducted. This protocol will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews. A three-step search strategy will be used. An initial search of databases will be undertaken to identify key search terms followed by an analysis of retrieved papers title and abstract text words, and of index terms used to describe the articles. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms will then be undertaken across all included databases. Third, the reference lists of identified reports and articles will be searched. Authors of primary articles will be contacted and a search for grey material performed. Finally, a complete search strategy of one major database will be included. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this is a scoping review, ethical approval is not required. The results of the scoping review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences and will guide a large research project investigating teamwork. All data will be stored in accordance with best General Data Protection Regulation practice. REGISTRATION: This scoping review protocol has been registered with Open Science Framework.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8319978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83199782021-08-02 Use of complexity theory in health and social care: a scoping review protocol Carroll, Aine Stokes, Diarmuid Darley, Andrew BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Despite the use of a wide variety of improvement tools and approaches, healthcare organisations continue to struggle in several key areas. Complexity-informed approaches have the potential to offer health and social care a new paradigm for understanding, designing, implementing and evaluating solutions, yet so far has failed to gain the traction anticipated some years ago. There is a growing need for high quality syntheses of the existing knowledge base in this area and given the diversity of theory and approaches, a scoping review is the best approach to curate this knowledge. METHODS: A scoping review of relevant literature from January 2000 to present, using the refined Arksey and O’Malley six-stage framework will be conducted. This protocol will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews. A three-step search strategy will be used. An initial search of databases will be undertaken to identify key search terms followed by an analysis of retrieved papers title and abstract text words, and of index terms used to describe the articles. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms will then be undertaken across all included databases. Third, the reference lists of identified reports and articles will be searched. Authors of primary articles will be contacted and a search for grey material performed. Finally, a complete search strategy of one major database will be included. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this is a scoping review, ethical approval is not required. The results of the scoping review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences and will guide a large research project investigating teamwork. All data will be stored in accordance with best General Data Protection Regulation practice. REGISTRATION: This scoping review protocol has been registered with Open Science Framework. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8319978/ /pubmed/34321301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047633 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Carroll, Aine
Stokes, Diarmuid
Darley, Andrew
Use of complexity theory in health and social care: a scoping review protocol
title Use of complexity theory in health and social care: a scoping review protocol
title_full Use of complexity theory in health and social care: a scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Use of complexity theory in health and social care: a scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Use of complexity theory in health and social care: a scoping review protocol
title_short Use of complexity theory in health and social care: a scoping review protocol
title_sort use of complexity theory in health and social care: a scoping review protocol
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34321301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047633
work_keys_str_mv AT carrollaine useofcomplexitytheoryinhealthandsocialcareascopingreviewprotocol
AT stokesdiarmuid useofcomplexitytheoryinhealthandsocialcareascopingreviewprotocol
AT darleyandrew useofcomplexitytheoryinhealthandsocialcareascopingreviewprotocol