Cargando…
Use of complexity theory in health and social care: a scoping review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Despite the use of a wide variety of improvement tools and approaches, healthcare organisations continue to struggle in several key areas. Complexity-informed approaches have the potential to offer health and social care a new paradigm for understanding, designing, implementing and eva...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34321301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047633 |
_version_ | 1783730558932615168 |
---|---|
author | Carroll, Aine Stokes, Diarmuid Darley, Andrew |
author_facet | Carroll, Aine Stokes, Diarmuid Darley, Andrew |
author_sort | Carroll, Aine |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Despite the use of a wide variety of improvement tools and approaches, healthcare organisations continue to struggle in several key areas. Complexity-informed approaches have the potential to offer health and social care a new paradigm for understanding, designing, implementing and evaluating solutions, yet so far has failed to gain the traction anticipated some years ago. There is a growing need for high quality syntheses of the existing knowledge base in this area and given the diversity of theory and approaches, a scoping review is the best approach to curate this knowledge. METHODS: A scoping review of relevant literature from January 2000 to present, using the refined Arksey and O’Malley six-stage framework will be conducted. This protocol will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews. A three-step search strategy will be used. An initial search of databases will be undertaken to identify key search terms followed by an analysis of retrieved papers title and abstract text words, and of index terms used to describe the articles. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms will then be undertaken across all included databases. Third, the reference lists of identified reports and articles will be searched. Authors of primary articles will be contacted and a search for grey material performed. Finally, a complete search strategy of one major database will be included. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this is a scoping review, ethical approval is not required. The results of the scoping review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences and will guide a large research project investigating teamwork. All data will be stored in accordance with best General Data Protection Regulation practice. REGISTRATION: This scoping review protocol has been registered with Open Science Framework. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8319978 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83199782021-08-02 Use of complexity theory in health and social care: a scoping review protocol Carroll, Aine Stokes, Diarmuid Darley, Andrew BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Despite the use of a wide variety of improvement tools and approaches, healthcare organisations continue to struggle in several key areas. Complexity-informed approaches have the potential to offer health and social care a new paradigm for understanding, designing, implementing and evaluating solutions, yet so far has failed to gain the traction anticipated some years ago. There is a growing need for high quality syntheses of the existing knowledge base in this area and given the diversity of theory and approaches, a scoping review is the best approach to curate this knowledge. METHODS: A scoping review of relevant literature from January 2000 to present, using the refined Arksey and O’Malley six-stage framework will be conducted. This protocol will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews. A three-step search strategy will be used. An initial search of databases will be undertaken to identify key search terms followed by an analysis of retrieved papers title and abstract text words, and of index terms used to describe the articles. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms will then be undertaken across all included databases. Third, the reference lists of identified reports and articles will be searched. Authors of primary articles will be contacted and a search for grey material performed. Finally, a complete search strategy of one major database will be included. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this is a scoping review, ethical approval is not required. The results of the scoping review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences and will guide a large research project investigating teamwork. All data will be stored in accordance with best General Data Protection Regulation practice. REGISTRATION: This scoping review protocol has been registered with Open Science Framework. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8319978/ /pubmed/34321301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047633 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Carroll, Aine Stokes, Diarmuid Darley, Andrew Use of complexity theory in health and social care: a scoping review protocol |
title | Use of complexity theory in health and social care: a scoping review protocol |
title_full | Use of complexity theory in health and social care: a scoping review protocol |
title_fullStr | Use of complexity theory in health and social care: a scoping review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of complexity theory in health and social care: a scoping review protocol |
title_short | Use of complexity theory in health and social care: a scoping review protocol |
title_sort | use of complexity theory in health and social care: a scoping review protocol |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34321301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047633 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carrollaine useofcomplexitytheoryinhealthandsocialcareascopingreviewprotocol AT stokesdiarmuid useofcomplexitytheoryinhealthandsocialcareascopingreviewprotocol AT darleyandrew useofcomplexitytheoryinhealthandsocialcareascopingreviewprotocol |