Cargando…

Efficacy of a strategy-based intervention on text-level reading comprehension in persons with aphasia: a study protocol for a repeated measures study

INTRODUCTION: At least 68% of persons with aphasia (PWA) experience reading difficulties. Even though strategy-based interventions are a promising treatment approach for text level reading comprehension deficits in PWA, empirical evidence for their efficacy remains rare. The primary objective of thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thumbeck, Sarah-Maria, Schmid, Philipp, Chesneau, Sophie, Domahs, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34321303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048126
_version_ 1783730559634112512
author Thumbeck, Sarah-Maria
Schmid, Philipp
Chesneau, Sophie
Domahs, Frank
author_facet Thumbeck, Sarah-Maria
Schmid, Philipp
Chesneau, Sophie
Domahs, Frank
author_sort Thumbeck, Sarah-Maria
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: At least 68% of persons with aphasia (PWA) experience reading difficulties. Even though strategy-based interventions are a promising treatment approach for text level reading comprehension deficits in PWA, empirical evidence for their efficacy remains rare. The primary objective of this study is the analysis of the efficacy of a strategy-based intervention on text-level reading comprehension and on reading activities in PWA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a repeated measures trial, 24 PWA will first participate in a waiting period and then in a strategy-based intervention (14 face-to-face-sessions, 60 min each). We will apply two combinations of strategies to treat either the microstructure or the macrostructure, respectively. Participants will be randomly allocated to two parallel groups that will receive these combinations in interchanged sequences. Assessments will be implemented before and after each period as well as 3 and 6 months after the intervention. The primary outcome measure is text-level reading comprehension measured with a German version of the Test de Compréhension de Textes (TCT-D) and represented by the score TCT-D Total. A non-blinded and a blinded rater will evaluate the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures will address specific reading functions, reading activities and cognitive functions. The sample size was determined with an a priori power analysis. For statistical analysis, we will use contrast analyses within repeated measures analysis of variance models. We expect significant improvements in primary and secondary outcome measures during the intervention as compared with changes during the waiting period. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the ethics committee of Deutscher Bundesverband für akademische Sprachtherapie und Logopädie (20–10074-KA-MunmErw+Ko). Results and relevant data will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, at conferences and on the Open Science Framework. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00021411 (see Supplementary Table 1).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8319981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83199812021-08-02 Efficacy of a strategy-based intervention on text-level reading comprehension in persons with aphasia: a study protocol for a repeated measures study Thumbeck, Sarah-Maria Schmid, Philipp Chesneau, Sophie Domahs, Frank BMJ Open Neurology INTRODUCTION: At least 68% of persons with aphasia (PWA) experience reading difficulties. Even though strategy-based interventions are a promising treatment approach for text level reading comprehension deficits in PWA, empirical evidence for their efficacy remains rare. The primary objective of this study is the analysis of the efficacy of a strategy-based intervention on text-level reading comprehension and on reading activities in PWA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In a repeated measures trial, 24 PWA will first participate in a waiting period and then in a strategy-based intervention (14 face-to-face-sessions, 60 min each). We will apply two combinations of strategies to treat either the microstructure or the macrostructure, respectively. Participants will be randomly allocated to two parallel groups that will receive these combinations in interchanged sequences. Assessments will be implemented before and after each period as well as 3 and 6 months after the intervention. The primary outcome measure is text-level reading comprehension measured with a German version of the Test de Compréhension de Textes (TCT-D) and represented by the score TCT-D Total. A non-blinded and a blinded rater will evaluate the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures will address specific reading functions, reading activities and cognitive functions. The sample size was determined with an a priori power analysis. For statistical analysis, we will use contrast analyses within repeated measures analysis of variance models. We expect significant improvements in primary and secondary outcome measures during the intervention as compared with changes during the waiting period. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the ethics committee of Deutscher Bundesverband für akademische Sprachtherapie und Logopädie (20–10074-KA-MunmErw+Ko). Results and relevant data will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, at conferences and on the Open Science Framework. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00021411 (see Supplementary Table 1). BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8319981/ /pubmed/34321303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048126 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Neurology
Thumbeck, Sarah-Maria
Schmid, Philipp
Chesneau, Sophie
Domahs, Frank
Efficacy of a strategy-based intervention on text-level reading comprehension in persons with aphasia: a study protocol for a repeated measures study
title Efficacy of a strategy-based intervention on text-level reading comprehension in persons with aphasia: a study protocol for a repeated measures study
title_full Efficacy of a strategy-based intervention on text-level reading comprehension in persons with aphasia: a study protocol for a repeated measures study
title_fullStr Efficacy of a strategy-based intervention on text-level reading comprehension in persons with aphasia: a study protocol for a repeated measures study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of a strategy-based intervention on text-level reading comprehension in persons with aphasia: a study protocol for a repeated measures study
title_short Efficacy of a strategy-based intervention on text-level reading comprehension in persons with aphasia: a study protocol for a repeated measures study
title_sort efficacy of a strategy-based intervention on text-level reading comprehension in persons with aphasia: a study protocol for a repeated measures study
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34321303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048126
work_keys_str_mv AT thumbecksarahmaria efficacyofastrategybasedinterventionontextlevelreadingcomprehensioninpersonswithaphasiaastudyprotocolforarepeatedmeasuresstudy
AT schmidphilipp efficacyofastrategybasedinterventionontextlevelreadingcomprehensioninpersonswithaphasiaastudyprotocolforarepeatedmeasuresstudy
AT chesneausophie efficacyofastrategybasedinterventionontextlevelreadingcomprehensioninpersonswithaphasiaastudyprotocolforarepeatedmeasuresstudy
AT domahsfrank efficacyofastrategybasedinterventionontextlevelreadingcomprehensioninpersonswithaphasiaastudyprotocolforarepeatedmeasuresstudy