Cargando…

Evaluating preferences for colorectal cancer screening in individuals under age 50 using the Analytic Hierarchy Process

BACKGROUND: In 2021, the United States Preventive Services Task Force updated their recommendation, stating that individuals ages 45-49 should initiate screening for colorectal cancer. Since several screening strategies are recommended, making a shared decision involves including an individual’s pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hyams, Travis, Golden, Bruce, Sammarco, John, Sultan, Shahnaz, King-Marshall, Evelyn, Wang, Min Qi, Curbow, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34325701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06705-9
_version_ 1783730572998213632
author Hyams, Travis
Golden, Bruce
Sammarco, John
Sultan, Shahnaz
King-Marshall, Evelyn
Wang, Min Qi
Curbow, Barbara
author_facet Hyams, Travis
Golden, Bruce
Sammarco, John
Sultan, Shahnaz
King-Marshall, Evelyn
Wang, Min Qi
Curbow, Barbara
author_sort Hyams, Travis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2021, the United States Preventive Services Task Force updated their recommendation, stating that individuals ages 45-49 should initiate screening for colorectal cancer. Since several screening strategies are recommended, making a shared decision involves including an individual’s preferences. Few studies have included individuals under age 50. In this study, we use a multicriteria decision analysis technique called the Analytic Hierarchy Process to explore preferences for screening strategies and evaluate whether preferences vary by age. METHODS: Participants evaluated a hierarchy with 3 decision alternatives (colonoscopy, fecal immunochemical test, and computed tomography colonography), 3 criteria (test effectiveness, the screening plan, and features of the test) and 7 sub-criteria. We used the linear fit method to calculate consistency ratios and the eigenvector method for group preferences. We conducted sensitivity analysis to assess whether results are robust to change and tested differences in preferences by participant variables using chi-square and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Of the 579 individuals surveyed, 556 (96%) provided complete responses to the AHP portion of the survey. Of these, 247 participants gave responses consistent enough (CR < 0.18) to be included in the final analysis. Participants that were either white or have lower health literacy were more likely to be excluded due to inconsistency. Colonoscopy was the preferred strategy in those < 50 and fecal immunochemical test was preferred by those over age 50 (p = 0.002). These results were consistent when we restricted analysis to individuals ages 45-55 (p = 0.011). Participants rated test effectiveness as the most important criteria for making their decision (weight = 0.555). Sensitivity analysis showed our results were robust to shifts in criteria and sub-criteria weights. CONCLUSIONS: We reveal potential differences in preferences for screening strategies by age that could influence the adoption of screening programs to include individuals under age 50. Researchers and practitioners should consider at-home interventions using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to assist with the formulation of preferences that are key to shared decision-making. The costs associated with different preferences for screening strategies should be explored further if limited resources must be allocated to screen individuals ages 45-49. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06705-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8320058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83200582021-07-30 Evaluating preferences for colorectal cancer screening in individuals under age 50 using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Hyams, Travis Golden, Bruce Sammarco, John Sultan, Shahnaz King-Marshall, Evelyn Wang, Min Qi Curbow, Barbara BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In 2021, the United States Preventive Services Task Force updated their recommendation, stating that individuals ages 45-49 should initiate screening for colorectal cancer. Since several screening strategies are recommended, making a shared decision involves including an individual’s preferences. Few studies have included individuals under age 50. In this study, we use a multicriteria decision analysis technique called the Analytic Hierarchy Process to explore preferences for screening strategies and evaluate whether preferences vary by age. METHODS: Participants evaluated a hierarchy with 3 decision alternatives (colonoscopy, fecal immunochemical test, and computed tomography colonography), 3 criteria (test effectiveness, the screening plan, and features of the test) and 7 sub-criteria. We used the linear fit method to calculate consistency ratios and the eigenvector method for group preferences. We conducted sensitivity analysis to assess whether results are robust to change and tested differences in preferences by participant variables using chi-square and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Of the 579 individuals surveyed, 556 (96%) provided complete responses to the AHP portion of the survey. Of these, 247 participants gave responses consistent enough (CR < 0.18) to be included in the final analysis. Participants that were either white or have lower health literacy were more likely to be excluded due to inconsistency. Colonoscopy was the preferred strategy in those < 50 and fecal immunochemical test was preferred by those over age 50 (p = 0.002). These results were consistent when we restricted analysis to individuals ages 45-55 (p = 0.011). Participants rated test effectiveness as the most important criteria for making their decision (weight = 0.555). Sensitivity analysis showed our results were robust to shifts in criteria and sub-criteria weights. CONCLUSIONS: We reveal potential differences in preferences for screening strategies by age that could influence the adoption of screening programs to include individuals under age 50. Researchers and practitioners should consider at-home interventions using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to assist with the formulation of preferences that are key to shared decision-making. The costs associated with different preferences for screening strategies should be explored further if limited resources must be allocated to screen individuals ages 45-49. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06705-9. BioMed Central 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8320058/ /pubmed/34325701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06705-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis license allows readers to copy, distribute and transmit the Article as long as it is attributed back to the author. Readers are permitted to alter, transform or build upon the Article, and to use the Article for commercial purposes. Please read the full license for further details at - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . This license enables owners of copyright- or database-protected content to waive the rights they hold in their works and thereby dedicate them to the public domain, to the extent permitted by law, so that others may freely build upon, enhance and reuse the works for any purposes without restriction under copyright or database law. Please read the full license for further details at -https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/cc0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Hyams, Travis
Golden, Bruce
Sammarco, John
Sultan, Shahnaz
King-Marshall, Evelyn
Wang, Min Qi
Curbow, Barbara
Evaluating preferences for colorectal cancer screening in individuals under age 50 using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
title Evaluating preferences for colorectal cancer screening in individuals under age 50 using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
title_full Evaluating preferences for colorectal cancer screening in individuals under age 50 using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
title_fullStr Evaluating preferences for colorectal cancer screening in individuals under age 50 using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating preferences for colorectal cancer screening in individuals under age 50 using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
title_short Evaluating preferences for colorectal cancer screening in individuals under age 50 using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
title_sort evaluating preferences for colorectal cancer screening in individuals under age 50 using the analytic hierarchy process
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34325701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06705-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hyamstravis evaluatingpreferencesforcolorectalcancerscreeninginindividualsunderage50usingtheanalytichierarchyprocess
AT goldenbruce evaluatingpreferencesforcolorectalcancerscreeninginindividualsunderage50usingtheanalytichierarchyprocess
AT sammarcojohn evaluatingpreferencesforcolorectalcancerscreeninginindividualsunderage50usingtheanalytichierarchyprocess
AT sultanshahnaz evaluatingpreferencesforcolorectalcancerscreeninginindividualsunderage50usingtheanalytichierarchyprocess
AT kingmarshallevelyn evaluatingpreferencesforcolorectalcancerscreeninginindividualsunderage50usingtheanalytichierarchyprocess
AT wangminqi evaluatingpreferencesforcolorectalcancerscreeninginindividualsunderage50usingtheanalytichierarchyprocess
AT curbowbarbara evaluatingpreferencesforcolorectalcancerscreeninginindividualsunderage50usingtheanalytichierarchyprocess