Cargando…
Caregiver reactions to neuroimaging evidence of covert consciousness in patients with severe brain injury: a qualitative interview study
BACKGROUND: Severe brain injury is a leading cause of death and disability. Diagnosis and prognostication are difficult, and errors occur often. Novel neuroimaging methods can improve diagnostic and prognostic accuracy, especially in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (PDoC). Yet it...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34320966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00674-8 |
_version_ | 1783730574372896768 |
---|---|
author | Peterson, Andrew Webster, Fiona Gonzalez-Lara, Laura Elizabeth Munce, Sarah Owen, Adrian M. Weijer, Charles |
author_facet | Peterson, Andrew Webster, Fiona Gonzalez-Lara, Laura Elizabeth Munce, Sarah Owen, Adrian M. Weijer, Charles |
author_sort | Peterson, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Severe brain injury is a leading cause of death and disability. Diagnosis and prognostication are difficult, and errors occur often. Novel neuroimaging methods can improve diagnostic and prognostic accuracy, especially in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (PDoC). Yet it is currently unknown how family caregivers understand this information, raising ethical concerns that disclosure of neuroimaging results could result in therapeutic misconception or false hope. METHODS: To examine these ethical concerns, we conducted semi-structured interviews with caregivers of patients with PDoC who were enrolled in a concurrent neuroimaging research program designed to detect covert consciousness following severe brain injury. Caregivers held surrogate decision-making status for a patient. Interviews were conducted at two time points for each caregiver. The first interview occurred before the disclosure of neuroimaging results. The second occurred after disclosure. Descriptive analysis was applied to the data of four interview topics: (1) expectations for neuroimaging; (2) reactions to evidence of preserved cognition; (3) reactions to null results; and (4) understanding of the results and study. RESULTS: Twelve caregivers participated in the study; two caregivers shared surrogate decision-making status for one patient with PDoC. Twenty-one interviews were completed; one caregiver declined to participate in the post-disclosure interview. Three patients with PDoC associated with the study displayed evidence of covert consciousness. Overall, caregivers understood the neuroimaging research and results. Caregivers who received results of covert consciousness were generally pleased. However, there was some variation in expectations and reactions to these data and null results. CONCLUSION: This study, for the first time, reveals caregiver expectations for and reactions to neuroimaging evidence of covert consciousness in patients with PDoC. Caregivers understood the neuroimaging research and results, casting doubt on speculative ethical concerns regarding therapeutic misconception and false hope. However, disclosure of neuroimaging result could be improved. Pre-disclosure consultations might assist professionals in shaping caregiver expectations. Standardization of disclosure might also improve comprehension of the results. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-021-00674-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8320067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83200672021-07-30 Caregiver reactions to neuroimaging evidence of covert consciousness in patients with severe brain injury: a qualitative interview study Peterson, Andrew Webster, Fiona Gonzalez-Lara, Laura Elizabeth Munce, Sarah Owen, Adrian M. Weijer, Charles BMC Med Ethics Research BACKGROUND: Severe brain injury is a leading cause of death and disability. Diagnosis and prognostication are difficult, and errors occur often. Novel neuroimaging methods can improve diagnostic and prognostic accuracy, especially in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (PDoC). Yet it is currently unknown how family caregivers understand this information, raising ethical concerns that disclosure of neuroimaging results could result in therapeutic misconception or false hope. METHODS: To examine these ethical concerns, we conducted semi-structured interviews with caregivers of patients with PDoC who were enrolled in a concurrent neuroimaging research program designed to detect covert consciousness following severe brain injury. Caregivers held surrogate decision-making status for a patient. Interviews were conducted at two time points for each caregiver. The first interview occurred before the disclosure of neuroimaging results. The second occurred after disclosure. Descriptive analysis was applied to the data of four interview topics: (1) expectations for neuroimaging; (2) reactions to evidence of preserved cognition; (3) reactions to null results; and (4) understanding of the results and study. RESULTS: Twelve caregivers participated in the study; two caregivers shared surrogate decision-making status for one patient with PDoC. Twenty-one interviews were completed; one caregiver declined to participate in the post-disclosure interview. Three patients with PDoC associated with the study displayed evidence of covert consciousness. Overall, caregivers understood the neuroimaging research and results. Caregivers who received results of covert consciousness were generally pleased. However, there was some variation in expectations and reactions to these data and null results. CONCLUSION: This study, for the first time, reveals caregiver expectations for and reactions to neuroimaging evidence of covert consciousness in patients with PDoC. Caregivers understood the neuroimaging research and results, casting doubt on speculative ethical concerns regarding therapeutic misconception and false hope. However, disclosure of neuroimaging result could be improved. Pre-disclosure consultations might assist professionals in shaping caregiver expectations. Standardization of disclosure might also improve comprehension of the results. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-021-00674-8. BioMed Central 2021-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8320067/ /pubmed/34320966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00674-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Peterson, Andrew Webster, Fiona Gonzalez-Lara, Laura Elizabeth Munce, Sarah Owen, Adrian M. Weijer, Charles Caregiver reactions to neuroimaging evidence of covert consciousness in patients with severe brain injury: a qualitative interview study |
title | Caregiver reactions to neuroimaging evidence of covert consciousness in patients with severe brain injury: a qualitative interview study |
title_full | Caregiver reactions to neuroimaging evidence of covert consciousness in patients with severe brain injury: a qualitative interview study |
title_fullStr | Caregiver reactions to neuroimaging evidence of covert consciousness in patients with severe brain injury: a qualitative interview study |
title_full_unstemmed | Caregiver reactions to neuroimaging evidence of covert consciousness in patients with severe brain injury: a qualitative interview study |
title_short | Caregiver reactions to neuroimaging evidence of covert consciousness in patients with severe brain injury: a qualitative interview study |
title_sort | caregiver reactions to neuroimaging evidence of covert consciousness in patients with severe brain injury: a qualitative interview study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34320966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00674-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petersonandrew caregiverreactionstoneuroimagingevidenceofcovertconsciousnessinpatientswithseverebraininjuryaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT websterfiona caregiverreactionstoneuroimagingevidenceofcovertconsciousnessinpatientswithseverebraininjuryaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT gonzalezlaralauraelizabeth caregiverreactionstoneuroimagingevidenceofcovertconsciousnessinpatientswithseverebraininjuryaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT muncesarah caregiverreactionstoneuroimagingevidenceofcovertconsciousnessinpatientswithseverebraininjuryaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT owenadrianm caregiverreactionstoneuroimagingevidenceofcovertconsciousnessinpatientswithseverebraininjuryaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT weijercharles caregiverreactionstoneuroimagingevidenceofcovertconsciousnessinpatientswithseverebraininjuryaqualitativeinterviewstudy |