Cargando…

Examining the frequency and concomitant dose of geometric verification imaging for patients undergoing proton beam therapy for ocular tumours; an audit of current clinical practice

OBJECTIVES: This paper uses clinical audit to determine the extent and dosimetric impact of additional imaging for patients undergoing ocular proton beam therapy who have no clips visible in the collimated beam. METHODS: An audit was conducted on 399 patients treated at The National Centre for Eye P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shrewsbury-Gee, Kate, Kelly, Daniel, Kirby, Mike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34381951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20210015
_version_ 1783730584892211200
author Shrewsbury-Gee, Kate
Kelly, Daniel
Kirby, Mike
author_facet Shrewsbury-Gee, Kate
Kelly, Daniel
Kirby, Mike
author_sort Shrewsbury-Gee, Kate
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This paper uses clinical audit to determine the extent and dosimetric impact of additional imaging for patients undergoing ocular proton beam therapy who have no clips visible in the collimated beam. METHODS: An audit was conducted on 399 patients treated at The National Centre for Eye Proton Therapy between 3 July 2017 and 14 June 2019. The mean total number of image pairs over the course of treatment for patients with and without clips visible in the collimated beam were compared. RESULTS: Among 364 evaluable patients, 333 had clips visible in the collimated beam and 31 did not. There was a statistically significant increase of five image pairs required for patients with no clips visible compared with those with clips visible (mean 14.6 vs 9.6 image pairs, respectively; p = 2.74 × 10(–6)). This equated to an additional 1.5 mGy absorbed dose, representing an increase in secondary cancer induction risk from 0.0004 to 0.0007%. CONCLUSIONS: The small increase in concomitant dose and set-up time for patients with no clips visible in the collimated beam is not clinically significant. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This novel work highlights clinical audit from real on-treatment geometric verification data and frequencies, rather than protocols, for ocular proton beam therapy; something not present in the literature. The simple and straightforward methodology is easily and equally applicable to clinical audits (especially those under Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations) for photon techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8320114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83201142021-08-10 Examining the frequency and concomitant dose of geometric verification imaging for patients undergoing proton beam therapy for ocular tumours; an audit of current clinical practice Shrewsbury-Gee, Kate Kelly, Daniel Kirby, Mike BJR Open Original Research OBJECTIVES: This paper uses clinical audit to determine the extent and dosimetric impact of additional imaging for patients undergoing ocular proton beam therapy who have no clips visible in the collimated beam. METHODS: An audit was conducted on 399 patients treated at The National Centre for Eye Proton Therapy between 3 July 2017 and 14 June 2019. The mean total number of image pairs over the course of treatment for patients with and without clips visible in the collimated beam were compared. RESULTS: Among 364 evaluable patients, 333 had clips visible in the collimated beam and 31 did not. There was a statistically significant increase of five image pairs required for patients with no clips visible compared with those with clips visible (mean 14.6 vs 9.6 image pairs, respectively; p = 2.74 × 10(–6)). This equated to an additional 1.5 mGy absorbed dose, representing an increase in secondary cancer induction risk from 0.0004 to 0.0007%. CONCLUSIONS: The small increase in concomitant dose and set-up time for patients with no clips visible in the collimated beam is not clinically significant. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This novel work highlights clinical audit from real on-treatment geometric verification data and frequencies, rather than protocols, for ocular proton beam therapy; something not present in the literature. The simple and straightforward methodology is easily and equally applicable to clinical audits (especially those under Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations) for photon techniques. The British Institute of Radiology. 2021-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8320114/ /pubmed/34381951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20210015 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Shrewsbury-Gee, Kate
Kelly, Daniel
Kirby, Mike
Examining the frequency and concomitant dose of geometric verification imaging for patients undergoing proton beam therapy for ocular tumours; an audit of current clinical practice
title Examining the frequency and concomitant dose of geometric verification imaging for patients undergoing proton beam therapy for ocular tumours; an audit of current clinical practice
title_full Examining the frequency and concomitant dose of geometric verification imaging for patients undergoing proton beam therapy for ocular tumours; an audit of current clinical practice
title_fullStr Examining the frequency and concomitant dose of geometric verification imaging for patients undergoing proton beam therapy for ocular tumours; an audit of current clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Examining the frequency and concomitant dose of geometric verification imaging for patients undergoing proton beam therapy for ocular tumours; an audit of current clinical practice
title_short Examining the frequency and concomitant dose of geometric verification imaging for patients undergoing proton beam therapy for ocular tumours; an audit of current clinical practice
title_sort examining the frequency and concomitant dose of geometric verification imaging for patients undergoing proton beam therapy for ocular tumours; an audit of current clinical practice
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34381951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20210015
work_keys_str_mv AT shrewsburygeekate examiningthefrequencyandconcomitantdoseofgeometricverificationimagingforpatientsundergoingprotonbeamtherapyforoculartumoursanauditofcurrentclinicalpractice
AT kellydaniel examiningthefrequencyandconcomitantdoseofgeometricverificationimagingforpatientsundergoingprotonbeamtherapyforoculartumoursanauditofcurrentclinicalpractice
AT kirbymike examiningthefrequencyandconcomitantdoseofgeometricverificationimagingforpatientsundergoingprotonbeamtherapyforoculartumoursanauditofcurrentclinicalpractice