Cargando…

A dosimetric study to improve the quality of nodal radiotherapy in breast cancer

OBJECTIVES: Field-based planning for regional nodal breast radiotherapy (RT) used to be standard practice. This study evaluated a field-based posterior axillary boost (PAB) and two forward-planned intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) techniques, aiming to replace the first. METHODS: Supraclavicular and axi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Welgemoed, Camarie, Coughlan, Simon, McNaught, Patti, Gujral, Dorothy, Riddle, Pippa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34381941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20210013
_version_ 1783730589110632448
author Welgemoed, Camarie
Coughlan, Simon
McNaught, Patti
Gujral, Dorothy
Riddle, Pippa
author_facet Welgemoed, Camarie
Coughlan, Simon
McNaught, Patti
Gujral, Dorothy
Riddle, Pippa
author_sort Welgemoed, Camarie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Field-based planning for regional nodal breast radiotherapy (RT) used to be standard practice. This study evaluated a field-based posterior axillary boost (PAB) and two forward-planned intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) techniques, aiming to replace the first. METHODS: Supraclavicular and axillary nodes, humeral head, brachial plexus, thyroid, and oesophagus were retrospectively delineated on 12 CT scans. Three plans, prescribed to 40.05 Gy, were produced for each patient. Breast plans consisted of field-in-field IMRT tangential fields in all three techniques. Nodal plans consisted of a field-based PAB (anterior and posterior boost beam), and 2 forward-planned techniques: simple IMRT 1 (anterior and posterior beam with limited segments), and a more advanced IMRT 2 technique (anterior and fully modulated posterior beam). RESULTS: The nodal V(90%) was similar between IMRT 1: mean 99.5% (SD 1.0) and IMRT 2: 99.4% (SD 0.5). Both demonstrated significantly improved results (p = 0.0001 and 0.005, respectively) compared to the field-based PAB technique. IMRT 2 lung V(12Gy) and humeral head V(10Gy) were significantly lower (p = 0.002, 0.0001, respectively) than the field-based PAB technique. IMRT 1 exhibited significantly lower brachial plexus D(max) and humeral head V(5), (10), and (15Gy) doses (p = 0.007, 0.013, 0.007 and 0.007, respectively) compared to the field-based PAB technique. The oesophagus and thyroid dose difference between methods was insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Both IMRT techniques achieved the dose coverage requirements and reduced normal tissue exposure, decreasing the risk of radiation side effects. Despite the increased cost of IMRT, compared to non-IMRT techniques (1), both IMRT techniques are suitable for supraclavicular and axillary nodal RT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Forward-planned IMRT already resulted in significant dose reduction to organs at risk and improved planning target volume coverage.(1) This new, simplified forward-planned IMRT one technique has not been published in this context and is easy to implement in routine clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8320135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83201352021-08-10 A dosimetric study to improve the quality of nodal radiotherapy in breast cancer Welgemoed, Camarie Coughlan, Simon McNaught, Patti Gujral, Dorothy Riddle, Pippa BJR Open Original Research OBJECTIVES: Field-based planning for regional nodal breast radiotherapy (RT) used to be standard practice. This study evaluated a field-based posterior axillary boost (PAB) and two forward-planned intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) techniques, aiming to replace the first. METHODS: Supraclavicular and axillary nodes, humeral head, brachial plexus, thyroid, and oesophagus were retrospectively delineated on 12 CT scans. Three plans, prescribed to 40.05 Gy, were produced for each patient. Breast plans consisted of field-in-field IMRT tangential fields in all three techniques. Nodal plans consisted of a field-based PAB (anterior and posterior boost beam), and 2 forward-planned techniques: simple IMRT 1 (anterior and posterior beam with limited segments), and a more advanced IMRT 2 technique (anterior and fully modulated posterior beam). RESULTS: The nodal V(90%) was similar between IMRT 1: mean 99.5% (SD 1.0) and IMRT 2: 99.4% (SD 0.5). Both demonstrated significantly improved results (p = 0.0001 and 0.005, respectively) compared to the field-based PAB technique. IMRT 2 lung V(12Gy) and humeral head V(10Gy) were significantly lower (p = 0.002, 0.0001, respectively) than the field-based PAB technique. IMRT 1 exhibited significantly lower brachial plexus D(max) and humeral head V(5), (10), and (15Gy) doses (p = 0.007, 0.013, 0.007 and 0.007, respectively) compared to the field-based PAB technique. The oesophagus and thyroid dose difference between methods was insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Both IMRT techniques achieved the dose coverage requirements and reduced normal tissue exposure, decreasing the risk of radiation side effects. Despite the increased cost of IMRT, compared to non-IMRT techniques (1), both IMRT techniques are suitable for supraclavicular and axillary nodal RT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Forward-planned IMRT already resulted in significant dose reduction to organs at risk and improved planning target volume coverage.(1) This new, simplified forward-planned IMRT one technique has not been published in this context and is easy to implement in routine clinical practice. The British Institute of Radiology. 2021-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8320135/ /pubmed/34381941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20210013 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Welgemoed, Camarie
Coughlan, Simon
McNaught, Patti
Gujral, Dorothy
Riddle, Pippa
A dosimetric study to improve the quality of nodal radiotherapy in breast cancer
title A dosimetric study to improve the quality of nodal radiotherapy in breast cancer
title_full A dosimetric study to improve the quality of nodal radiotherapy in breast cancer
title_fullStr A dosimetric study to improve the quality of nodal radiotherapy in breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed A dosimetric study to improve the quality of nodal radiotherapy in breast cancer
title_short A dosimetric study to improve the quality of nodal radiotherapy in breast cancer
title_sort dosimetric study to improve the quality of nodal radiotherapy in breast cancer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34381941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20210013
work_keys_str_mv AT welgemoedcamarie adosimetricstudytoimprovethequalityofnodalradiotherapyinbreastcancer
AT coughlansimon adosimetricstudytoimprovethequalityofnodalradiotherapyinbreastcancer
AT mcnaughtpatti adosimetricstudytoimprovethequalityofnodalradiotherapyinbreastcancer
AT gujraldorothy adosimetricstudytoimprovethequalityofnodalradiotherapyinbreastcancer
AT riddlepippa adosimetricstudytoimprovethequalityofnodalradiotherapyinbreastcancer
AT welgemoedcamarie dosimetricstudytoimprovethequalityofnodalradiotherapyinbreastcancer
AT coughlansimon dosimetricstudytoimprovethequalityofnodalradiotherapyinbreastcancer
AT mcnaughtpatti dosimetricstudytoimprovethequalityofnodalradiotherapyinbreastcancer
AT gujraldorothy dosimetricstudytoimprovethequalityofnodalradiotherapyinbreastcancer
AT riddlepippa dosimetricstudytoimprovethequalityofnodalradiotherapyinbreastcancer