Cargando…

Importance of confirming the underlying diagnosis in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): a single-centre retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Many patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) are discharged without a known aetiology for their clinical presentation. This study sought to assess the effect of this ‘indeterminate MINOCA’ diagnosis on the prevalence of recurrent cardiovascular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pustjens, T. F. S., Meerman, A., Vranken, N. P. A., Ruiters, A. W., Gho, B., Stein, M., Ilhan, M., Veenstra, L., Winkler, P., Lux, Á., Rasoul, S., van ‘t Hof, A. W. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34320950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02176-2
_version_ 1783730593601683456
author Pustjens, T. F. S.
Meerman, A.
Vranken, N. P. A.
Ruiters, A. W.
Gho, B.
Stein, M.
Ilhan, M.
Veenstra, L.
Winkler, P.
Lux, Á.
Rasoul, S.
van ‘t Hof, A. W. J.
author_facet Pustjens, T. F. S.
Meerman, A.
Vranken, N. P. A.
Ruiters, A. W.
Gho, B.
Stein, M.
Ilhan, M.
Veenstra, L.
Winkler, P.
Lux, Á.
Rasoul, S.
van ‘t Hof, A. W. J.
author_sort Pustjens, T. F. S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Many patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) are discharged without a known aetiology for their clinical presentation. This study sought to assess the effect of this ‘indeterminate MINOCA’ diagnosis on the prevalence of recurrent cardiovascular events and presentations to the Cardiac Emergency Department (CED). METHODS: We retrospectively analysed all patients meeting the diagnostic MINOCA criteria presenting at a large secondary hospital between January 2017 and April 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were divided into the (1) ‘indeterminate MINOCA’, or (2) ‘MINOCA with diagnosis’ group. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke and any revascularisation procedure. Secondary outcomes were all recurrent visits at the CED, and MACE including unplanned cardiac hospitalisation. RESULTS: In 62/198 (31.3%) MINOCA patients, a conclusive diagnosis was found (myocardial infarction, (peri)myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, or miscellaneous). MINOCA patients with a confirmed diagnosis were younger compared to those with an indeterminate diagnosis (56.7 vs. 62.3 years, p = 0.007), had higher maximum troponin-T [238 ng/L vs. 69 ng/L, p < 0.001] and creatine kinase (CK) levels [212U/L vs. 152U/L, p = 0.007], and presented more frequently with electrocardiographic signs of ischaemia (71.0% vs. 47.1%, p = 0.002). Indeterminate MINOCA patients more often showed recurrent CED presentations (36.8% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.048), however the occurrence of cardiovascular events was equal (8.8 vs. 8.1%, p = 0.86). Multivariable analysis showed that elevated levels of troponin-T and CK, ST-segment deviation on electrocardiography, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, regional wall motion abnormalities, and performance of additional examination methods were independent predictors for finding the underlying MINOCA cause. CONCLUSIONS: Only in one-third of MINOCA patients a conclusive diagnosis for the acute presentation was identified. Recurrent CED visits were more often observed in the indeterminate MINOCA group, while the occurrence of cardiovascular events was similar across groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8320155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83201552021-07-30 Importance of confirming the underlying diagnosis in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): a single-centre retrospective cohort study Pustjens, T. F. S. Meerman, A. Vranken, N. P. A. Ruiters, A. W. Gho, B. Stein, M. Ilhan, M. Veenstra, L. Winkler, P. Lux, Á. Rasoul, S. van ‘t Hof, A. W. J. BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research BACKGROUND: Many patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) are discharged without a known aetiology for their clinical presentation. This study sought to assess the effect of this ‘indeterminate MINOCA’ diagnosis on the prevalence of recurrent cardiovascular events and presentations to the Cardiac Emergency Department (CED). METHODS: We retrospectively analysed all patients meeting the diagnostic MINOCA criteria presenting at a large secondary hospital between January 2017 and April 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were divided into the (1) ‘indeterminate MINOCA’, or (2) ‘MINOCA with diagnosis’ group. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke and any revascularisation procedure. Secondary outcomes were all recurrent visits at the CED, and MACE including unplanned cardiac hospitalisation. RESULTS: In 62/198 (31.3%) MINOCA patients, a conclusive diagnosis was found (myocardial infarction, (peri)myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, or miscellaneous). MINOCA patients with a confirmed diagnosis were younger compared to those with an indeterminate diagnosis (56.7 vs. 62.3 years, p = 0.007), had higher maximum troponin-T [238 ng/L vs. 69 ng/L, p < 0.001] and creatine kinase (CK) levels [212U/L vs. 152U/L, p = 0.007], and presented more frequently with electrocardiographic signs of ischaemia (71.0% vs. 47.1%, p = 0.002). Indeterminate MINOCA patients more often showed recurrent CED presentations (36.8% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.048), however the occurrence of cardiovascular events was equal (8.8 vs. 8.1%, p = 0.86). Multivariable analysis showed that elevated levels of troponin-T and CK, ST-segment deviation on electrocardiography, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, regional wall motion abnormalities, and performance of additional examination methods were independent predictors for finding the underlying MINOCA cause. CONCLUSIONS: Only in one-third of MINOCA patients a conclusive diagnosis for the acute presentation was identified. Recurrent CED visits were more often observed in the indeterminate MINOCA group, while the occurrence of cardiovascular events was similar across groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered BioMed Central 2021-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8320155/ /pubmed/34320950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02176-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Pustjens, T. F. S.
Meerman, A.
Vranken, N. P. A.
Ruiters, A. W.
Gho, B.
Stein, M.
Ilhan, M.
Veenstra, L.
Winkler, P.
Lux, Á.
Rasoul, S.
van ‘t Hof, A. W. J.
Importance of confirming the underlying diagnosis in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): a single-centre retrospective cohort study
title Importance of confirming the underlying diagnosis in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): a single-centre retrospective cohort study
title_full Importance of confirming the underlying diagnosis in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): a single-centre retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Importance of confirming the underlying diagnosis in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): a single-centre retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Importance of confirming the underlying diagnosis in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): a single-centre retrospective cohort study
title_short Importance of confirming the underlying diagnosis in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): a single-centre retrospective cohort study
title_sort importance of confirming the underlying diagnosis in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (minoca): a single-centre retrospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34320950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-021-02176-2
work_keys_str_mv AT pustjenstfs importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT meermana importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT vrankennpa importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ruitersaw importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ghob importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT steinm importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ilhanm importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT veenstral importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT winklerp importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT luxa importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT rasouls importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy
AT vanthofawj importanceofconfirmingtheunderlyingdiagnosisinpatientswithmyocardialinfarctionandnonobstructivecoronaryarteriesminocaasinglecentreretrospectivecohortstudy