Cargando…

Interventions designed to increase the uptake of lung cancer screening and implications for priority populations: a scoping review protocol

BACKGROUND: When designing any health intervention, it is important to respond to the unequal determinants of health by prioritising the allocation of resources and tailoring interventions based on the disproportionate burden of illness. This approach, called the targeting of priority populations, c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sayani, Ambreen, Ali, Muhanad Ahmed, Corrado, Ann Marie, Ziegler, Carolyn, Sadler, Alex, Williams, Christina, Lofters, Aisha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34321305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050056
_version_ 1783730614915039232
author Sayani, Ambreen
Ali, Muhanad Ahmed
Corrado, Ann Marie
Ziegler, Carolyn
Sadler, Alex
Williams, Christina
Lofters, Aisha
author_facet Sayani, Ambreen
Ali, Muhanad Ahmed
Corrado, Ann Marie
Ziegler, Carolyn
Sadler, Alex
Williams, Christina
Lofters, Aisha
author_sort Sayani, Ambreen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: When designing any health intervention, it is important to respond to the unequal determinants of health by prioritising the allocation of resources and tailoring interventions based on the disproportionate burden of illness. This approach, called the targeting of priority populations, can prevent a widening of health inequities, particularly those inequities which can be further widened by differences in the uptake of an intervention. The objective of this scoping review is to describe intervention(s) designed to increase the uptake of lung cancer screening, including the health impact on priority populations and to describe knowledge and implementation gaps to inform the design of equitable lung cancer screening. METHODS: We will conduct a scoping review following the methodological framework developed by Arksey and O’Malley. We will conduct comprehensive searches for lung cancer screening promotion interventions in Ovid Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health (CINAHL) and Scopus. We will include published English language peer-reviewed and grey literature published between January 2000 and 2020 that describe an intervention designed to increase the uptake of low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries. Articles not in English or not describing LDCT will be excluded. Three authors will review retrieved literature in three steps: title, abstract and then full text. Three additional authors will review discrepancies. Authors will extract data from full-text papers into a chart adapted from the Template for Intervention Description and Republication checklist, the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials and a Health Equity Impact Assessment tool. Findings will be presented using a narrative synthesis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The knowledge synthesised will be used to inform the equitable design of lung cancer screening and disseminated through conferences, publications and shared with relevant partners. The study does not require research ethics approval as literature is available online.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8320256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83202562021-08-02 Interventions designed to increase the uptake of lung cancer screening and implications for priority populations: a scoping review protocol Sayani, Ambreen Ali, Muhanad Ahmed Corrado, Ann Marie Ziegler, Carolyn Sadler, Alex Williams, Christina Lofters, Aisha BMJ Open Oncology BACKGROUND: When designing any health intervention, it is important to respond to the unequal determinants of health by prioritising the allocation of resources and tailoring interventions based on the disproportionate burden of illness. This approach, called the targeting of priority populations, can prevent a widening of health inequities, particularly those inequities which can be further widened by differences in the uptake of an intervention. The objective of this scoping review is to describe intervention(s) designed to increase the uptake of lung cancer screening, including the health impact on priority populations and to describe knowledge and implementation gaps to inform the design of equitable lung cancer screening. METHODS: We will conduct a scoping review following the methodological framework developed by Arksey and O’Malley. We will conduct comprehensive searches for lung cancer screening promotion interventions in Ovid Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health (CINAHL) and Scopus. We will include published English language peer-reviewed and grey literature published between January 2000 and 2020 that describe an intervention designed to increase the uptake of low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries. Articles not in English or not describing LDCT will be excluded. Three authors will review retrieved literature in three steps: title, abstract and then full text. Three additional authors will review discrepancies. Authors will extract data from full-text papers into a chart adapted from the Template for Intervention Description and Republication checklist, the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials and a Health Equity Impact Assessment tool. Findings will be presented using a narrative synthesis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The knowledge synthesised will be used to inform the equitable design of lung cancer screening and disseminated through conferences, publications and shared with relevant partners. The study does not require research ethics approval as literature is available online. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8320256/ /pubmed/34321305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050056 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Oncology
Sayani, Ambreen
Ali, Muhanad Ahmed
Corrado, Ann Marie
Ziegler, Carolyn
Sadler, Alex
Williams, Christina
Lofters, Aisha
Interventions designed to increase the uptake of lung cancer screening and implications for priority populations: a scoping review protocol
title Interventions designed to increase the uptake of lung cancer screening and implications for priority populations: a scoping review protocol
title_full Interventions designed to increase the uptake of lung cancer screening and implications for priority populations: a scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Interventions designed to increase the uptake of lung cancer screening and implications for priority populations: a scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Interventions designed to increase the uptake of lung cancer screening and implications for priority populations: a scoping review protocol
title_short Interventions designed to increase the uptake of lung cancer screening and implications for priority populations: a scoping review protocol
title_sort interventions designed to increase the uptake of lung cancer screening and implications for priority populations: a scoping review protocol
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34321305
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050056
work_keys_str_mv AT sayaniambreen interventionsdesignedtoincreasetheuptakeoflungcancerscreeningandimplicationsforprioritypopulationsascopingreviewprotocol
AT alimuhanadahmed interventionsdesignedtoincreasetheuptakeoflungcancerscreeningandimplicationsforprioritypopulationsascopingreviewprotocol
AT corradoannmarie interventionsdesignedtoincreasetheuptakeoflungcancerscreeningandimplicationsforprioritypopulationsascopingreviewprotocol
AT zieglercarolyn interventionsdesignedtoincreasetheuptakeoflungcancerscreeningandimplicationsforprioritypopulationsascopingreviewprotocol
AT sadleralex interventionsdesignedtoincreasetheuptakeoflungcancerscreeningandimplicationsforprioritypopulationsascopingreviewprotocol
AT williamschristina interventionsdesignedtoincreasetheuptakeoflungcancerscreeningandimplicationsforprioritypopulationsascopingreviewprotocol
AT loftersaisha interventionsdesignedtoincreasetheuptakeoflungcancerscreeningandimplicationsforprioritypopulationsascopingreviewprotocol