Cargando…

Double masking protection vs. comfort—A quantitative assessment

COVID-19 has forced humankind to adopt face masks as an integral part of everyday life. This preventive measure is an effective source control technique to curb the spread of COVID-19 and other similar diseases. The virus responsible for causing COVID-19 has undergone several mutations in the recent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arumuru, Venugopal, Samantaray, Sidhartha Sankar, Pasa, Jangyadatta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AIP Publishing LLC 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0058571
_version_ 1783730654433771520
author Arumuru, Venugopal
Samantaray, Sidhartha Sankar
Pasa, Jangyadatta
author_facet Arumuru, Venugopal
Samantaray, Sidhartha Sankar
Pasa, Jangyadatta
author_sort Arumuru, Venugopal
collection PubMed
description COVID-19 has forced humankind to adopt face masks as an integral part of everyday life. This preventive measure is an effective source control technique to curb the spread of COVID-19 and other similar diseases. The virus responsible for causing COVID-19 has undergone several mutations in the recent past, including B.1.1.7, B.1.351, P.1, and N501Y, B.1.617, with a higher infectious rate. These viruses' variants are mainly responsible for the recent spike in COVID-19 cases and associated steep rise in mortality rate worldwide. Under these circumstances, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and health experts recommend double masking, which mainly includes a surgical mask and a cotton mask for the general public. This combination provides an additional layer of protection and masks fitment to minimize the leakage of droplets expelled during coughing, sneezing, talking, and breathing. This leakage may cause airborne transmission of the virus. In the present study, we report a systematic quantitative unsteady pressure measurement supplement with flow visualization to quantify the effectiveness of a single and double mask. We have also evaluated double masking consisting of a surgical mask and an N-95 mask used by medical professionals. A simple knot improves the surgical mask fitment significantly, and hence, the leakage of droplets is minimized. The leakage of the droplets was reduced to a large extent by using a double mask combination of a two-layer cotton mask over the surgical mask with a knot. The double mask combination of surgical + N-95 and two-layer cotton + N-95 masks showed the most promising results, and no leakage of the droplets is observed in the forward direction. A double mask combination of surgical and N-95 mask offers 8.6% and 5.6% lower mean and peak pressures compared to surgical, and cotton mask. The best results are observed with cotton and N-95 masks with 54.6% and 23% lower mean and peak pressures than surgical and cotton masks; hence, this combination will offer more comfort to the wearer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8320463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AIP Publishing LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83204632021-07-29 Double masking protection vs. comfort—A quantitative assessment Arumuru, Venugopal Samantaray, Sidhartha Sankar Pasa, Jangyadatta Phys Fluids (1994) Articles COVID-19 has forced humankind to adopt face masks as an integral part of everyday life. This preventive measure is an effective source control technique to curb the spread of COVID-19 and other similar diseases. The virus responsible for causing COVID-19 has undergone several mutations in the recent past, including B.1.1.7, B.1.351, P.1, and N501Y, B.1.617, with a higher infectious rate. These viruses' variants are mainly responsible for the recent spike in COVID-19 cases and associated steep rise in mortality rate worldwide. Under these circumstances, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and health experts recommend double masking, which mainly includes a surgical mask and a cotton mask for the general public. This combination provides an additional layer of protection and masks fitment to minimize the leakage of droplets expelled during coughing, sneezing, talking, and breathing. This leakage may cause airborne transmission of the virus. In the present study, we report a systematic quantitative unsteady pressure measurement supplement with flow visualization to quantify the effectiveness of a single and double mask. We have also evaluated double masking consisting of a surgical mask and an N-95 mask used by medical professionals. A simple knot improves the surgical mask fitment significantly, and hence, the leakage of droplets is minimized. The leakage of the droplets was reduced to a large extent by using a double mask combination of a two-layer cotton mask over the surgical mask with a knot. The double mask combination of surgical + N-95 and two-layer cotton + N-95 masks showed the most promising results, and no leakage of the droplets is observed in the forward direction. A double mask combination of surgical and N-95 mask offers 8.6% and 5.6% lower mean and peak pressures compared to surgical, and cotton mask. The best results are observed with cotton and N-95 masks with 54.6% and 23% lower mean and peak pressures than surgical and cotton masks; hence, this combination will offer more comfort to the wearer. AIP Publishing LLC 2021-07 2021-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8320463/ /pubmed/34335010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0058571 Text en © 2021 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Articles
Arumuru, Venugopal
Samantaray, Sidhartha Sankar
Pasa, Jangyadatta
Double masking protection vs. comfort—A quantitative assessment
title Double masking protection vs. comfort—A quantitative assessment
title_full Double masking protection vs. comfort—A quantitative assessment
title_fullStr Double masking protection vs. comfort—A quantitative assessment
title_full_unstemmed Double masking protection vs. comfort—A quantitative assessment
title_short Double masking protection vs. comfort—A quantitative assessment
title_sort double masking protection vs. comfort—a quantitative assessment
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0058571
work_keys_str_mv AT arumuruvenugopal doublemaskingprotectionvscomfortaquantitativeassessment
AT samantaraysidharthasankar doublemaskingprotectionvscomfortaquantitativeassessment
AT pasajangyadatta doublemaskingprotectionvscomfortaquantitativeassessment