Cargando…
Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety between dexmedetomidine and propofol among patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and propofol in patients who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy. METHODS: Relevant studies comparing dexmedetomidine and propofol among patients who underwent gastrointestinal endoscopy were retrieved from databases such as...
Autores principales: | Liu, Weihua, Yu, Wenli, Yu, Hongli, Sheng, Mingwei |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34308693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211032786 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Safety of gastrointestinal endoscopy with conscious sedation in obstructive sleep apnea
por: Andrade, Christian M, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Propofol vs traditional sedatives for sedation in endoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Delgado, Aureo Augusto de Almeida, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine Combined with Bupivacaine on Caudal Epidural Block in Children: A Meta-Analysis
por: Tu, Zhenzhen, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Propofol vs midazolam sedation for elective endoscopy in patients with cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
por: Guacho, John Alexander Lata, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Dexmedetomidine versus propofol on the sedation of pediatric patients during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning: a meta-analysis of current studies
por: Zhou, Qiang, et al.
Publicado: (2017)