Cargando…

The Evoked Compound Action Potential as a Predictor for Perception in Chronic Pain Patients: Tools for Automatic Spinal Cord Stimulator Programming and Control

OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a drug free treatment for chronic pain. Recent technological advances have enabled sensing of the evoked compound action potential (ECAP), a biopotential that represents neural activity elicited from SCS. The amplitudes of many SCS paradigms – both sub- a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pilitsis, Julie G., Chakravarthy, Krishnan V., Will, Andrew J., Trutnau, Karen C., Hageman, Kristin N., Dinsmoor, David A., Litvak, Leonid M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335157
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.673998
_version_ 1783730720526565376
author Pilitsis, Julie G.
Chakravarthy, Krishnan V.
Will, Andrew J.
Trutnau, Karen C.
Hageman, Kristin N.
Dinsmoor, David A.
Litvak, Leonid M.
author_facet Pilitsis, Julie G.
Chakravarthy, Krishnan V.
Will, Andrew J.
Trutnau, Karen C.
Hageman, Kristin N.
Dinsmoor, David A.
Litvak, Leonid M.
author_sort Pilitsis, Julie G.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a drug free treatment for chronic pain. Recent technological advances have enabled sensing of the evoked compound action potential (ECAP), a biopotential that represents neural activity elicited from SCS. The amplitudes of many SCS paradigms – both sub- and supra-threshold – are programmed relative to the patient’s perception of SCS. The objective of this study, then, is to elucidate relationships between the ECAP and perception thresholds across posture and SCS pulse width. These relationships may be used for the automatic control and perceptually referenced programming of SCS systems. METHODS: ECAPs were acquired from 14 subjects across a range of postures and pulse widths with swept amplitude stimulation. Perception (PT) and discomfort (DT) thresholds were recorded. A stimulation artifact reduction scheme was employed, and growth curves were constructed from the sweeps. An estimate of the ECAP threshold (ET), was calculated from the growth curves using a novel approach. Relationships between ET, PT, and DT were assessed. RESULTS: ETs were estimated from 112 separate growth curves. For the postures and pulse widths assessed, the ET tightly correlated with both PT (r = 0.93; p < 0.0001) and DT (r = 0.93; p < 0.0001). The median accuracy of ET as a predictor for PT across both posture and pulse width was 0.5 dB. Intra-subject, ECAP amplitudes at DT varied up to threefold across posture. CONCLUSION: We provide evidence that the ET varies across both different positions and varying pulse widths and suggest that this variance may be the result of postural dependence of the recording electrode-tissue spacing. ET-informed SCS holds promise as a tool for SCS parameter configuration and may offer more accuracy over alternative approaches for neural and perceptual control in closed loop SCS systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8320888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83208882021-07-30 The Evoked Compound Action Potential as a Predictor for Perception in Chronic Pain Patients: Tools for Automatic Spinal Cord Stimulator Programming and Control Pilitsis, Julie G. Chakravarthy, Krishnan V. Will, Andrew J. Trutnau, Karen C. Hageman, Kristin N. Dinsmoor, David A. Litvak, Leonid M. Front Neurosci Neuroscience OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a drug free treatment for chronic pain. Recent technological advances have enabled sensing of the evoked compound action potential (ECAP), a biopotential that represents neural activity elicited from SCS. The amplitudes of many SCS paradigms – both sub- and supra-threshold – are programmed relative to the patient’s perception of SCS. The objective of this study, then, is to elucidate relationships between the ECAP and perception thresholds across posture and SCS pulse width. These relationships may be used for the automatic control and perceptually referenced programming of SCS systems. METHODS: ECAPs were acquired from 14 subjects across a range of postures and pulse widths with swept amplitude stimulation. Perception (PT) and discomfort (DT) thresholds were recorded. A stimulation artifact reduction scheme was employed, and growth curves were constructed from the sweeps. An estimate of the ECAP threshold (ET), was calculated from the growth curves using a novel approach. Relationships between ET, PT, and DT were assessed. RESULTS: ETs were estimated from 112 separate growth curves. For the postures and pulse widths assessed, the ET tightly correlated with both PT (r = 0.93; p < 0.0001) and DT (r = 0.93; p < 0.0001). The median accuracy of ET as a predictor for PT across both posture and pulse width was 0.5 dB. Intra-subject, ECAP amplitudes at DT varied up to threefold across posture. CONCLUSION: We provide evidence that the ET varies across both different positions and varying pulse widths and suggest that this variance may be the result of postural dependence of the recording electrode-tissue spacing. ET-informed SCS holds promise as a tool for SCS parameter configuration and may offer more accuracy over alternative approaches for neural and perceptual control in closed loop SCS systems. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8320888/ /pubmed/34335157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.673998 Text en Copyright © 2021 Pilitsis, Chakravarthy, Will, Trutnau, Hageman, Dinsmoor and Litvak. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Pilitsis, Julie G.
Chakravarthy, Krishnan V.
Will, Andrew J.
Trutnau, Karen C.
Hageman, Kristin N.
Dinsmoor, David A.
Litvak, Leonid M.
The Evoked Compound Action Potential as a Predictor for Perception in Chronic Pain Patients: Tools for Automatic Spinal Cord Stimulator Programming and Control
title The Evoked Compound Action Potential as a Predictor for Perception in Chronic Pain Patients: Tools for Automatic Spinal Cord Stimulator Programming and Control
title_full The Evoked Compound Action Potential as a Predictor for Perception in Chronic Pain Patients: Tools for Automatic Spinal Cord Stimulator Programming and Control
title_fullStr The Evoked Compound Action Potential as a Predictor for Perception in Chronic Pain Patients: Tools for Automatic Spinal Cord Stimulator Programming and Control
title_full_unstemmed The Evoked Compound Action Potential as a Predictor for Perception in Chronic Pain Patients: Tools for Automatic Spinal Cord Stimulator Programming and Control
title_short The Evoked Compound Action Potential as a Predictor for Perception in Chronic Pain Patients: Tools for Automatic Spinal Cord Stimulator Programming and Control
title_sort evoked compound action potential as a predictor for perception in chronic pain patients: tools for automatic spinal cord stimulator programming and control
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34335157
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.673998
work_keys_str_mv AT pilitsisjulieg theevokedcompoundactionpotentialasapredictorforperceptioninchronicpainpatientstoolsforautomaticspinalcordstimulatorprogrammingandcontrol
AT chakravarthykrishnanv theevokedcompoundactionpotentialasapredictorforperceptioninchronicpainpatientstoolsforautomaticspinalcordstimulatorprogrammingandcontrol
AT willandrewj theevokedcompoundactionpotentialasapredictorforperceptioninchronicpainpatientstoolsforautomaticspinalcordstimulatorprogrammingandcontrol
AT trutnaukarenc theevokedcompoundactionpotentialasapredictorforperceptioninchronicpainpatientstoolsforautomaticspinalcordstimulatorprogrammingandcontrol
AT hagemankristinn theevokedcompoundactionpotentialasapredictorforperceptioninchronicpainpatientstoolsforautomaticspinalcordstimulatorprogrammingandcontrol
AT dinsmoordavida theevokedcompoundactionpotentialasapredictorforperceptioninchronicpainpatientstoolsforautomaticspinalcordstimulatorprogrammingandcontrol
AT litvakleonidm theevokedcompoundactionpotentialasapredictorforperceptioninchronicpainpatientstoolsforautomaticspinalcordstimulatorprogrammingandcontrol
AT pilitsisjulieg evokedcompoundactionpotentialasapredictorforperceptioninchronicpainpatientstoolsforautomaticspinalcordstimulatorprogrammingandcontrol
AT chakravarthykrishnanv evokedcompoundactionpotentialasapredictorforperceptioninchronicpainpatientstoolsforautomaticspinalcordstimulatorprogrammingandcontrol
AT willandrewj evokedcompoundactionpotentialasapredictorforperceptioninchronicpainpatientstoolsforautomaticspinalcordstimulatorprogrammingandcontrol
AT trutnaukarenc evokedcompoundactionpotentialasapredictorforperceptioninchronicpainpatientstoolsforautomaticspinalcordstimulatorprogrammingandcontrol
AT hagemankristinn evokedcompoundactionpotentialasapredictorforperceptioninchronicpainpatientstoolsforautomaticspinalcordstimulatorprogrammingandcontrol
AT dinsmoordavida evokedcompoundactionpotentialasapredictorforperceptioninchronicpainpatientstoolsforautomaticspinalcordstimulatorprogrammingandcontrol
AT litvakleonidm evokedcompoundactionpotentialasapredictorforperceptioninchronicpainpatientstoolsforautomaticspinalcordstimulatorprogrammingandcontrol