Cargando…
Knee-Cartilage Segmentation and Thickness Measurement from 2D Ultrasound
Ultrasound (US) could become a standard of care imaging modality for the quantitative assessment of femoral cartilage thickness for the early diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis. However, low contrast, high levels of speckle noise, and various imaging artefacts hinder the analysis of collected data. Ac...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34460481 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging5040043 |
_version_ | 1783730733759594496 |
---|---|
author | Desai, Prajna Hacihaliloglu, Ilker |
author_facet | Desai, Prajna Hacihaliloglu, Ilker |
author_sort | Desai, Prajna |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ultrasound (US) could become a standard of care imaging modality for the quantitative assessment of femoral cartilage thickness for the early diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis. However, low contrast, high levels of speckle noise, and various imaging artefacts hinder the analysis of collected data. Accurate, robust, and fully automatic US image-enhancement and cartilage-segmentation methods are needed in order to improve the widespread deployment of this imaging modality for knee-osteoarthritis diagnosis and monitoring. In this work, we propose a method based on local-phase-based image processing for automatic knee-cartilage image enhancement, segmentation, and thickness measurement. A local-phase feature-guided dynamic-programming approach is used for the fully automatic localization of knee-bone surfaces. The localized bone surfaces are used as seed points for automating the seed-guided segmentation of the cartilage. We evaluated the Random Walker (RW), watershed, and graph-cut-based segmentation methods from 200 scans obtained from ten healthy volunteers. Validation against manual expert segmentation achieved a mean dice similarity coefficient of 0.90, 0.86, and 0.84 for the RW, watershed, and graph-cut segmentation methods, respectively. Automatically segmented cartilage regions achieved 0.18 mm localization accuracy compared to manual expert thickness measurement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8320944 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-83209442021-08-26 Knee-Cartilage Segmentation and Thickness Measurement from 2D Ultrasound Desai, Prajna Hacihaliloglu, Ilker J Imaging Article Ultrasound (US) could become a standard of care imaging modality for the quantitative assessment of femoral cartilage thickness for the early diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis. However, low contrast, high levels of speckle noise, and various imaging artefacts hinder the analysis of collected data. Accurate, robust, and fully automatic US image-enhancement and cartilage-segmentation methods are needed in order to improve the widespread deployment of this imaging modality for knee-osteoarthritis diagnosis and monitoring. In this work, we propose a method based on local-phase-based image processing for automatic knee-cartilage image enhancement, segmentation, and thickness measurement. A local-phase feature-guided dynamic-programming approach is used for the fully automatic localization of knee-bone surfaces. The localized bone surfaces are used as seed points for automating the seed-guided segmentation of the cartilage. We evaluated the Random Walker (RW), watershed, and graph-cut-based segmentation methods from 200 scans obtained from ten healthy volunteers. Validation against manual expert segmentation achieved a mean dice similarity coefficient of 0.90, 0.86, and 0.84 for the RW, watershed, and graph-cut segmentation methods, respectively. Automatically segmented cartilage regions achieved 0.18 mm localization accuracy compared to manual expert thickness measurement. MDPI 2019-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8320944/ /pubmed/34460481 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging5040043 Text en © 2019 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Article Desai, Prajna Hacihaliloglu, Ilker Knee-Cartilage Segmentation and Thickness Measurement from 2D Ultrasound |
title | Knee-Cartilage Segmentation and Thickness Measurement from 2D Ultrasound |
title_full | Knee-Cartilage Segmentation and Thickness Measurement from 2D Ultrasound |
title_fullStr | Knee-Cartilage Segmentation and Thickness Measurement from 2D Ultrasound |
title_full_unstemmed | Knee-Cartilage Segmentation and Thickness Measurement from 2D Ultrasound |
title_short | Knee-Cartilage Segmentation and Thickness Measurement from 2D Ultrasound |
title_sort | knee-cartilage segmentation and thickness measurement from 2d ultrasound |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34460481 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging5040043 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT desaiprajna kneecartilagesegmentationandthicknessmeasurementfrom2dultrasound AT hacihalilogluilker kneecartilagesegmentationandthicknessmeasurementfrom2dultrasound |