Cargando…

Knee-Cartilage Segmentation and Thickness Measurement from 2D Ultrasound

Ultrasound (US) could become a standard of care imaging modality for the quantitative assessment of femoral cartilage thickness for the early diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis. However, low contrast, high levels of speckle noise, and various imaging artefacts hinder the analysis of collected data. Ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Desai, Prajna, Hacihaliloglu, Ilker
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34460481
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging5040043
_version_ 1783730733759594496
author Desai, Prajna
Hacihaliloglu, Ilker
author_facet Desai, Prajna
Hacihaliloglu, Ilker
author_sort Desai, Prajna
collection PubMed
description Ultrasound (US) could become a standard of care imaging modality for the quantitative assessment of femoral cartilage thickness for the early diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis. However, low contrast, high levels of speckle noise, and various imaging artefacts hinder the analysis of collected data. Accurate, robust, and fully automatic US image-enhancement and cartilage-segmentation methods are needed in order to improve the widespread deployment of this imaging modality for knee-osteoarthritis diagnosis and monitoring. In this work, we propose a method based on local-phase-based image processing for automatic knee-cartilage image enhancement, segmentation, and thickness measurement. A local-phase feature-guided dynamic-programming approach is used for the fully automatic localization of knee-bone surfaces. The localized bone surfaces are used as seed points for automating the seed-guided segmentation of the cartilage. We evaluated the Random Walker (RW), watershed, and graph-cut-based segmentation methods from 200 scans obtained from ten healthy volunteers. Validation against manual expert segmentation achieved a mean dice similarity coefficient of 0.90, 0.86, and 0.84 for the RW, watershed, and graph-cut segmentation methods, respectively. Automatically segmented cartilage regions achieved 0.18 mm localization accuracy compared to manual expert thickness measurement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8320944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83209442021-08-26 Knee-Cartilage Segmentation and Thickness Measurement from 2D Ultrasound Desai, Prajna Hacihaliloglu, Ilker J Imaging Article Ultrasound (US) could become a standard of care imaging modality for the quantitative assessment of femoral cartilage thickness for the early diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis. However, low contrast, high levels of speckle noise, and various imaging artefacts hinder the analysis of collected data. Accurate, robust, and fully automatic US image-enhancement and cartilage-segmentation methods are needed in order to improve the widespread deployment of this imaging modality for knee-osteoarthritis diagnosis and monitoring. In this work, we propose a method based on local-phase-based image processing for automatic knee-cartilage image enhancement, segmentation, and thickness measurement. A local-phase feature-guided dynamic-programming approach is used for the fully automatic localization of knee-bone surfaces. The localized bone surfaces are used as seed points for automating the seed-guided segmentation of the cartilage. We evaluated the Random Walker (RW), watershed, and graph-cut-based segmentation methods from 200 scans obtained from ten healthy volunteers. Validation against manual expert segmentation achieved a mean dice similarity coefficient of 0.90, 0.86, and 0.84 for the RW, watershed, and graph-cut segmentation methods, respectively. Automatically segmented cartilage regions achieved 0.18 mm localization accuracy compared to manual expert thickness measurement. MDPI 2019-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8320944/ /pubmed/34460481 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging5040043 Text en © 2019 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Desai, Prajna
Hacihaliloglu, Ilker
Knee-Cartilage Segmentation and Thickness Measurement from 2D Ultrasound
title Knee-Cartilage Segmentation and Thickness Measurement from 2D Ultrasound
title_full Knee-Cartilage Segmentation and Thickness Measurement from 2D Ultrasound
title_fullStr Knee-Cartilage Segmentation and Thickness Measurement from 2D Ultrasound
title_full_unstemmed Knee-Cartilage Segmentation and Thickness Measurement from 2D Ultrasound
title_short Knee-Cartilage Segmentation and Thickness Measurement from 2D Ultrasound
title_sort knee-cartilage segmentation and thickness measurement from 2d ultrasound
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34460481
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging5040043
work_keys_str_mv AT desaiprajna kneecartilagesegmentationandthicknessmeasurementfrom2dultrasound
AT hacihalilogluilker kneecartilagesegmentationandthicknessmeasurementfrom2dultrasound