Cargando…

Multi-Focus Image Fusion and Depth Map Estimation Based on Iterative Region Splitting Techniques

In this paper, a multi-focus image stack captured by varying positions of the imaging plane is processed to synthesize an all-in-focus (AIF) image and estimate its corresponding depth map. Compared with traditional methods (e.g., pixel- and block-based techniques), our focus-based measures are calcu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lie, Wen-Nung, Ho, Chia-Che
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34460667
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging5090073
_version_ 1783730737070997504
author Lie, Wen-Nung
Ho, Chia-Che
author_facet Lie, Wen-Nung
Ho, Chia-Che
author_sort Lie, Wen-Nung
collection PubMed
description In this paper, a multi-focus image stack captured by varying positions of the imaging plane is processed to synthesize an all-in-focus (AIF) image and estimate its corresponding depth map. Compared with traditional methods (e.g., pixel- and block-based techniques), our focus-based measures are calculated based on irregularly shaped regions that have been refined or split in an iterative manner, to adapt to different image contents. An initial all-focus image is first computed, which is then segmented to get a region map. Spatial-focal property for each region is then analyzed to determine whether a region should be iteratively split into sub-regions. After iterative splitting, the final region map is used to perform regionally best focusing, based on the Winner-take-all (WTA) strategy, i.e., choosing the best focused pixels from image stack. The depth image can be easily converted from the resulting label image, where the label for each pixel represents the image index from which the pixel with the best focus is chosen. Regions whose focus profiles are not confident in getting a winner of the best focus will resort to spatial propagation from neighboring confident regions. Our experiments show that the adaptive region-splitting algorithm outperforms other state-of-the-art methods or commercial software in synthesis quality (in terms of a well-known Q metric), depth maps (in terms of subjective quality), and processing speed (with a gain of 17.81~40.43%).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8320958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-83209582021-08-26 Multi-Focus Image Fusion and Depth Map Estimation Based on Iterative Region Splitting Techniques Lie, Wen-Nung Ho, Chia-Che J Imaging Article In this paper, a multi-focus image stack captured by varying positions of the imaging plane is processed to synthesize an all-in-focus (AIF) image and estimate its corresponding depth map. Compared with traditional methods (e.g., pixel- and block-based techniques), our focus-based measures are calculated based on irregularly shaped regions that have been refined or split in an iterative manner, to adapt to different image contents. An initial all-focus image is first computed, which is then segmented to get a region map. Spatial-focal property for each region is then analyzed to determine whether a region should be iteratively split into sub-regions. After iterative splitting, the final region map is used to perform regionally best focusing, based on the Winner-take-all (WTA) strategy, i.e., choosing the best focused pixels from image stack. The depth image can be easily converted from the resulting label image, where the label for each pixel represents the image index from which the pixel with the best focus is chosen. Regions whose focus profiles are not confident in getting a winner of the best focus will resort to spatial propagation from neighboring confident regions. Our experiments show that the adaptive region-splitting algorithm outperforms other state-of-the-art methods or commercial software in synthesis quality (in terms of a well-known Q metric), depth maps (in terms of subjective quality), and processing speed (with a gain of 17.81~40.43%). MDPI 2019-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8320958/ /pubmed/34460667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging5090073 Text en © 2019 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Article
Lie, Wen-Nung
Ho, Chia-Che
Multi-Focus Image Fusion and Depth Map Estimation Based on Iterative Region Splitting Techniques
title Multi-Focus Image Fusion and Depth Map Estimation Based on Iterative Region Splitting Techniques
title_full Multi-Focus Image Fusion and Depth Map Estimation Based on Iterative Region Splitting Techniques
title_fullStr Multi-Focus Image Fusion and Depth Map Estimation Based on Iterative Region Splitting Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Multi-Focus Image Fusion and Depth Map Estimation Based on Iterative Region Splitting Techniques
title_short Multi-Focus Image Fusion and Depth Map Estimation Based on Iterative Region Splitting Techniques
title_sort multi-focus image fusion and depth map estimation based on iterative region splitting techniques
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8320958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34460667
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jimaging5090073
work_keys_str_mv AT liewennung multifocusimagefusionanddepthmapestimationbasedoniterativeregionsplittingtechniques
AT hochiache multifocusimagefusionanddepthmapestimationbasedoniterativeregionsplittingtechniques